--- title: "stealing-ur-feelings vs ClawBench" type: "comparison" canonical_url: "https://www.graphcanon.com/compare/noahlevenson-stealing-ur-feelings-vs-tiger-ai-lab-clawbench" tools: ["noahlevenson-stealing-ur-feelings", "tiger-ai-lab-clawbench"] --- # stealing-ur-feelings vs ClawBench *GraphCanon updated Jul 31, 2026* ## Verdict Pick stealing-ur-feelings if a deep learning-powered AR experience that analyzes facial expressions and emotions to highlight issues of privacy in emotional surveillance; pick ClawBench if clawBench offers an open-source benchmark framework for evaluating browser-based AI agents on real-world online tasks. [stealing-ur-feelings](https://github.com/noahlevenson/stealing-ur-feelings) reports 927 GitHub stars, 32 forks, and 13 open issues, last pushed Apr 26, 2023. [ClawBench](https://claw-bench.com) has 532 stars, 30 forks, and 47 open issues, last pushed Jul 28, 2026. Figures are from public GitHub metadata via [stealing-ur-feelings's repository](https://github.com/noahlevenson/stealing-ur-feelings) and [ClawBench's repository](https://github.com/TIGER-AI-Lab/ClawBench). | | [stealing-ur-feelings](/tools/noahlevenson-stealing-ur-feelings.md) | [ClawBench](/tools/tiger-ai-lab-clawbench.md) | | --- | --- | --- | | Tagline | Deep learning-powered AR experience analyzing facial reactions | Open-source benchmark for browser AI agents on daily tasks | | Stars | 927 | 532 | | Forks | 32 | 30 | | Open issues | 13 | 47 | | Language | JavaScript | Python | | Adopt for | A deep learning-powered AR experience that analyzes facial expressions and emotions to highlight issues of privacy in emotional surveillance. | ClawBench offers an open-source benchmark framework for evaluating browser-based AI agents on real-world online tasks. | | Persona | - | - | | Runtime | - | - | | License | - | ClawBench operates under the Apache-2.0 license, offering a permissive free software license that encourages software reuse and interoperability. | | Categories | Computer Vision, Speech & Audio | AI Agents, Evaluation & Observability | ## Trust and health _Sourced signals - not a safety guarantee. No winner column._ | | [stealing-ur-feelings](/tools/noahlevenson-stealing-ur-feelings.md) | [ClawBench](/tools/tiger-ai-lab-clawbench.md) | | --- | --- | --- | | Maintenance | Dormant (18%) | Very active (96%) | | Days since push | 1192d | 0d | | Open issues (now) | 13 | 47 | | Owner type | User | Organization | | Full report | [trust report](/tools/noahlevenson-stealing-ur-feelings/trust.md) | [trust report](/tools/tiger-ai-lab-clawbench/trust.md) | ## Decision facts: stealing-ur-feelings - **Adopt for:** A deep learning-powered AR experience that analyzes facial expressions and emotions to highlight issues of privacy in emotional surveillance. ## Decision facts: ClawBench - **Requirements:** Requires setup for browser automation tasks within the Chrome environment. - **Adopt for:** ClawBench offers an open-source benchmark framework for evaluating browser-based AI agents on real-world online tasks. - **License detail:** ClawBench operates under the Apache-2.0 license, offering a permissive free software license that encourages software reuse and interoperability. ## Choose when ### Choose stealing-ur-feelings if… - stealing-ur-feelings is primarily JavaScript; ClawBench is Python. - Tags unique to stealing-ur-feelings: ai, ar, art, augmented-reality. - Also covers Computer Vision, Speech & Audio. - When planning to explore the ethical implications of AI-driven emotive surveillance technology. ### Choose ClawBench if… - ClawBench is primarily Python; stealing-ur-feelings is JavaScript. - Requirements: Requires setup for browser automation tasks within the Chrome environment.. - Tags unique to ClawBench: agent-evaluation, agentic-ai, browser-agent, llm-evaluation. - Also covers AI Agents, Evaluation & Observability. - You are developing a browser AI agent and wish to measure its performance against everyday online activities, as ClawBench specifically simulates these scenarios. ## When NOT to use stealing-ur-feelings - If your project requires a robust tool for commercial facial emotion analysis without the context of privacy concerns and artistic interpretation. - When seeking real-time, production-grade emotional recognition software designed for user studies or market research purposes. ## When NOT to use ClawBench - If your focus is solely on backend server-based AI evaluations without a browser interface involvement, ClawBench will not be the appropriate choice. - For those developing standalone applications or mobile agents, ClawBench’s browser-centric tasks will not reflect their operational capabilities accurately. ## Common questions ### What is the difference between stealing-ur-feelings and ClawBench? stealing-ur-feelings: Deep learning-powered AR experience analyzing facial reactions. ClawBench: Open-source benchmark for browser AI agents on daily tasks. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories. ### When should I choose stealing-ur-feelings over ClawBench? Choose stealing-ur-feelings over ClawBench when stealing-ur-feelings is primarily JavaScript; ClawBench is Python; Tags unique to stealing-ur-feelings: ai, ar, art, augmented-reality; Also covers Computer Vision, Speech & Audio; When planning to explore the ethical implications of AI-driven emotive surveillance technology. ### When should I choose ClawBench over stealing-ur-feelings? Choose ClawBench over stealing-ur-feelings when ClawBench is primarily Python; stealing-ur-feelings is JavaScript; Requirements: Requires setup for browser automation tasks within the Chrome environment.; Tags unique to ClawBench: agent-evaluation, agentic-ai, browser-agent, llm-evaluation; Also covers AI Agents, Evaluation & Observability; You are developing a browser AI agent and wish to measure its performance against everyday online activities, as ClawBench specifically simulates these scenarios. ### When should I avoid stealing-ur-feelings? If your project requires a robust tool for commercial facial emotion analysis without the context of privacy concerns and artistic interpretation. When seeking real-time, production-grade emotional recognition software designed for user studies or market research purposes. ### When should I avoid ClawBench? If your focus is solely on backend server-based AI evaluations without a browser interface involvement, ClawBench will not be the appropriate choice. For those developing standalone applications or mobile agents, ClawBench’s browser-centric tasks will not reflect their operational capabilities accurately. ### Is stealing-ur-feelings or ClawBench more popular on GitHub? stealing-ur-feelings has more GitHub stars (927 vs 532). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints. ### Are stealing-ur-feelings and ClawBench open source? Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub. ### Where can I find alternatives to stealing-ur-feelings or ClawBench? GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at [stealing-ur-feelings alternatives](/tools/noahlevenson-stealing-ur-feelings/alternatives) and [ClawBench alternatives](/tools/tiger-ai-lab-clawbench/alternatives) ([stealing-ur-feelings markdown twin](/tools/noahlevenson-stealing-ur-feelings/alternatives.md), [ClawBench markdown twin](/tools/tiger-ai-lab-clawbench/alternatives.md)), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes. ### Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison? Yes. The markdown twin at [this comparison](/compare/noahlevenson-stealing-ur-feelings-vs-tiger-ai-lab-clawbench.md) mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers. ### Which is better maintained, stealing-ur-feelings or ClawBench? stealing-ur-feelings: Dormant. ClawBench: Very active. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance. ### Where are the full trust reports for stealing-ur-feelings and ClawBench? GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: [stealing-ur-feelings trust report](/tools/noahlevenson-stealing-ur-feelings/trust); [ClawBench trust report](/tools/tiger-ai-lab-clawbench/trust). --- **Machine-readable endpoints** - JSON: [`/api/graphcanon/graph?tool=noahlevenson-stealing-ur-feelings`](/api/graphcanon/graph?tool=noahlevenson-stealing-ur-feelings) - LLM index: [/llms.txt](/llms.txt) - Full corpus: [/llms-full.txt](/llms-full.txt) _GraphCanon - The knowledge graph for AI development. https://www.graphcanon.com/_