---
title: "Amphion vs auto-subs"
type: "comparison"
canonical_url: "https://www.graphcanon.com/compare/open-mmlab-amphion-vs-tmoroney-auto-subs"
tools: ["open-mmlab-amphion", "tmoroney-auto-subs"]
---

# Amphion vs auto-subs

*GraphCanon updated Jul 11, 2026*

## Verdict

Pick Amphion when amphion is primarily Python; auto-subs is TypeScript; pick auto-subs when auto-subs is primarily TypeScript; Amphion is Python.

[Amphion](https://openhlt.github.io/amphion/) reports 9.9k GitHub stars, 822 forks, and 175 open issues, last pushed Mar 25, 2026. [auto-subs](https://tom-moroney.com/auto-subs/) has 3.8k stars, 245 forks, and 216 open issues, last pushed Jul 4, 2026. Figures are from public GitHub metadata via [Amphion's repository](https://github.com/open-mmlab/Amphion) and [auto-subs's repository](https://github.com/tmoroney/auto-subs).

| | [Amphion](/tools/open-mmlab-amphion.md) | [auto-subs](/tools/tmoroney-auto-subs.md) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Tagline | Amphion (/æmˈfaɪən/) is a toolkit for Audio, Music, and Speech Generation. Its purpose is to support reproducible research and help junior researchers and engineers get started in the field of audio,  | On-device subtitle generation that connects directly to DaVinci Resolve, Premiere, and After Effects. |
| Stars | 9,927 | 3,796 |
| Forks | 822 | 245 |
| Open issues | 175 | 216 |
| Language | Python | TypeScript |
| Adopt for | - | - |
| Persona | - | - |
| Runtime | - | - |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Categories | Computer Vision, Inference & Serving, Speech & Audio | Speech & Audio |

## Trust and health

_Sourced signals - not a safety guarantee. No winner column._

| | [Amphion](/tools/open-mmlab-amphion.md) | [auto-subs](/tools/tmoroney-auto-subs.md) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Maintenance | Slowing (36%) | Very active (96%) |
| Days since push | 107d | 6d |
| Open issues (now) | 175 | 216 |
| Owner type | Organization | User |
| Full report | [trust report](/tools/open-mmlab-amphion/trust.md) | [trust report](/tools/tmoroney-auto-subs/trust.md) |

## Choose when

### Choose Amphion if…

- Amphion is primarily Python; auto-subs is TypeScript.
- Tags unique to Amphion: audio-generation, audio-synthesis, audioldm, audit.
- Also covers Computer Vision, Inference & Serving.
- Amphion ships Docker support for self-hosted deployment.

### Choose auto-subs if…

- auto-subs is primarily TypeScript; Amphion is Python.
- Tags unique to auto-subs: ai, cross-platform, davinci, davinci-resolve.
- More recently updated (last pushed Jul 4, 2026).

## When NOT to use Amphion

- Last GitHub push was 108 days ago (slowing maintenance, Mar 25, 2026). Validate activity before betting a new project on Amphion.
- Inference & Serving: Self-hosting rarely beats a hosted API on cost until you have steady, high-volume traffic.

## Common questions

### What is the difference between Amphion and auto-subs?

Amphion: Amphion (/æmˈfaɪən/) is a toolkit for Audio, Music, and Speech Generation. Its purpose is to support reproducible research and help junior researchers and engineers get started in the field of audio, . auto-subs: On-device subtitle generation that connects directly to DaVinci Resolve, Premiere, and After Effects.. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.

### When should I choose Amphion over auto-subs?

Choose Amphion over auto-subs when Amphion is primarily Python; auto-subs is TypeScript; Tags unique to Amphion: audio-generation, audio-synthesis, audioldm, audit; Also covers Computer Vision, Inference & Serving; Amphion ships Docker support for self-hosted deployment.

### When should I choose auto-subs over Amphion?

Choose auto-subs over Amphion when auto-subs is primarily TypeScript; Amphion is Python; Tags unique to auto-subs: ai, cross-platform, davinci, davinci-resolve; More recently updated (last pushed Jul 4, 2026).

### When should I avoid Amphion?

Last GitHub push was 108 days ago (slowing maintenance, Mar 25, 2026). Validate activity before betting a new project on Amphion. Inference & Serving: Self-hosting rarely beats a hosted API on cost until you have steady, high-volume traffic.

### Is Amphion or auto-subs more popular on GitHub?

Amphion has more GitHub stars (9,927 vs 3,796). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.

### Are Amphion and auto-subs open source?

Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (Amphion: MIT, auto-subs: MIT).

### Where can I find alternatives to Amphion or auto-subs?

GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at [Amphion alternatives](/tools/open-mmlab-amphion/alternatives) and [auto-subs alternatives](/tools/tmoroney-auto-subs/alternatives) ([Amphion markdown twin](/tools/open-mmlab-amphion/alternatives.md), [auto-subs markdown twin](/tools/tmoroney-auto-subs/alternatives.md)), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.

### Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?

Yes. The markdown twin at [this comparison](/compare/open-mmlab-amphion-vs-tmoroney-auto-subs.md) mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.

### Which is better maintained, Amphion or auto-subs?

Amphion: Slowing. auto-subs: Very active. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.

### Where are the full trust reports for Amphion and auto-subs?

GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: [Amphion trust report](/tools/open-mmlab-amphion/trust); [auto-subs trust report](/tools/tmoroney-auto-subs/trust).

---

**Machine-readable endpoints**

- JSON: [`/api/graphcanon/graph?tool=open-mmlab-amphion`](/api/graphcanon/graph?tool=open-mmlab-amphion)
- LLM index: [/llms.txt](/llms.txt)
- Full corpus: [/llms-full.txt](/llms-full.txt)

_GraphCanon - The knowledge graph for AI development. https://www.graphcanon.com/_
