---
title: "open-webui vs llm-applications"
type: "comparison"
canonical_url: "https://www.graphcanon.com/compare/open-webui-open-webui-vs-ray-project-llm-applications"
tools: ["open-webui-open-webui", "ray-project-llm-applications"]
---

# open-webui vs llm-applications

*GraphCanon updated Jul 11, 2026*

## Verdict

Pick open-webui when open-webui is primarily Python; llm-applications is Jupyter Notebook; pick llm-applications when llm-applications is primarily Jupyter Notebook; open-webui is Python.

[open-webui](https://openwebui.com) reports 145k GitHub stars, 21k forks, and 391 open issues, last pushed Jul 10, 2026. [llm-applications](https://github.com/ray-project/llm-applications) has 1.9k stars, 255 forks, and 13 open issues, last pushed Aug 2, 2024. Figures are from public GitHub metadata via [open-webui's repository](https://github.com/open-webui/open-webui) and [llm-applications's repository](https://github.com/ray-project/llm-applications).

| | [open-webui](/tools/open-webui-open-webui.md) | [llm-applications](/tools/ray-project-llm-applications.md) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Tagline | User-friendly AI Interface (Supports Ollama, OpenAI API, ...) | A comprehensive guide to building RAG-based LLM applications for production. |
| Stars | 145,029 | 1,857 |
| Forks | 21,005 | 255 |
| Open issues | 391 | 13 |
| Language | Python | Jupyter Notebook |
| Adopt for | Suitable for developers working with large language models who require a user-friendly interface and support for multiple APIs including Ollama and OpenAI. | - |
| Persona | - | - |
| Runtime | - | - |
| License | Other | CC-BY-4.0 |
| Categories | LLM Frameworks, Inference & Serving | LLM Frameworks, Inference & Serving |

## Trust and health

_Sourced signals - not a safety guarantee. No winner column._

| | [open-webui](/tools/open-webui-open-webui.md) | [llm-applications](/tools/ray-project-llm-applications.md) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Maintenance | Very active (96%) | Dormant (18%) |
| Days since push | 0d | 708d |
| Open issues (now) | 391 | 13 |
| Security scan | No MCP manifest | No lockfile |
| Full report | [trust report](/tools/open-webui-open-webui/trust.md) | [trust report](/tools/ray-project-llm-applications/trust.md) |

## Decision facts: open-webui

- **Adopt for:** Suitable for developers working with large language models who require a user-friendly interface and support for multiple APIs including Ollama and OpenAI.

## Choose when

### Choose open-webui if…

- open-webui is primarily Python; llm-applications is Jupyter Notebook.
- License: open-webui is Other, llm-applications is CC-BY-4.0.
- Tags unique to open-webui: self-hosted, llm, ai.
- When you need to integrate multiple AI services, such as Ollama and OpenAI, into a unified user interface.

### Choose llm-applications if…

- llm-applications is primarily Jupyter Notebook; open-webui is Python.
- License: llm-applications is CC-BY-4.0, open-webui is Other.
- Tags unique to llm-applications: ray, llms, fine-tuning, machine-learning.

## When NOT to use open-webui

- When looking for tooling that exclusively supports APIs other than Ollama and OpenAI, as these are specific areas of focus for open-webui.
- If the requirement is a highly specialized interface tailored to specific tasks rather than a general AI interaction platform.

## When NOT to use llm-applications

- Last GitHub push was 709 days ago (dormant maintenance, Aug 2, 2024). Validate activity before betting a new project on llm-applications.
- LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves.
- Inference & Serving: Self-hosting rarely beats a hosted API on cost until you have steady, high-volume traffic.

## Common questions

### What is the difference between open-webui and llm-applications?

open-webui: User-friendly AI Interface (Supports Ollama, OpenAI API, ...). llm-applications: A comprehensive guide to building RAG-based LLM applications for production.. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.

### When should I choose open-webui over llm-applications?

Choose open-webui over llm-applications when open-webui is primarily Python; llm-applications is Jupyter Notebook; License: open-webui is Other, llm-applications is CC-BY-4.0; Tags unique to open-webui: self-hosted, llm, ai; When you need to integrate multiple AI services, such as Ollama and OpenAI, into a unified user interface.

### When should I choose llm-applications over open-webui?

Choose llm-applications over open-webui when llm-applications is primarily Jupyter Notebook; open-webui is Python; License: llm-applications is CC-BY-4.0, open-webui is Other; Tags unique to llm-applications: ray, llms, fine-tuning, machine-learning.

### When should I avoid open-webui?

When looking for tooling that exclusively supports APIs other than Ollama and OpenAI, as these are specific areas of focus for open-webui. If the requirement is a highly specialized interface tailored to specific tasks rather than a general AI interaction platform.

### When should I avoid llm-applications?

Last GitHub push was 709 days ago (dormant maintenance, Aug 2, 2024). Validate activity before betting a new project on llm-applications. LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves. Inference & Serving: Self-hosting rarely beats a hosted API on cost until you have steady, high-volume traffic.

### Is open-webui or llm-applications more popular on GitHub?

open-webui has more GitHub stars (145,029 vs 1,857). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.

### Are open-webui and llm-applications open source?

Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (open-webui: Other, llm-applications: CC-BY-4.0).

### Where can I find alternatives to open-webui or llm-applications?

GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at [open-webui alternatives](/tools/open-webui-open-webui/alternatives) and [llm-applications alternatives](/tools/ray-project-llm-applications/alternatives) ([open-webui markdown twin](/tools/open-webui-open-webui/alternatives.md), [llm-applications markdown twin](/tools/ray-project-llm-applications/alternatives.md)), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.

### Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?

Yes. The markdown twin at [this comparison](/compare/open-webui-open-webui-vs-ray-project-llm-applications.md) mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.

### Which is better maintained, open-webui or llm-applications?

open-webui: Very active. llm-applications: Dormant. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.

### Where are the full trust reports for open-webui and llm-applications?

GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: [open-webui trust report](/tools/open-webui-open-webui/trust); [llm-applications trust report](/tools/ray-project-llm-applications/trust).

---

**Machine-readable endpoints**

- JSON: [`/api/graphcanon/graph?tool=open-webui-open-webui`](/api/graphcanon/graph?tool=open-webui-open-webui)
- LLM index: [/llms.txt](/llms.txt)
- Full corpus: [/llms-full.txt](/llms-full.txt)

_GraphCanon - The knowledge graph for AI development. https://www.graphcanon.com/_
