---
title: "OpenRLHF vs LLM-Agent-Paper-List"
type: "comparison"
canonical_url: "https://www.graphcanon.com/compare/openrlhf-openrlhf-vs-woooodyy-llm-agent-paper-list"
tools: ["openrlhf-openrlhf", "woooodyy-llm-agent-paper-list"]
---

# OpenRLHF vs LLM-Agent-Paper-List

*GraphCanon updated Sep 20, 2026*

## Verdict

Pick OpenRLHF if openRLHF is a scalable and high-performance reinforcement learning framework from human feedback, built on Ray for distributed scheduling and vLLM for efficient inference, supporting models up to 70B+ parameters; pick LLM-Agent-Paper-List if lLM-Agent-Paper-List is a curated repository of essential papers on large language model-based agents, focusing on AgentGym, a framework for developing and training LLM agents through.

[OpenRLHF](https://openrlhf.readthedocs.io/) reports 10k GitHub stars, 1.0k forks, and 380 open issues, last pushed Sep 17, 2026. [LLM-Agent-Paper-List](https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.07864) has 8.2k stars, 499 forks, and 32 open issues, last pushed Sep 12, 2025. Figures are from public GitHub metadata via [OpenRLHF's repository](https://github.com/OpenRLHF/OpenRLHF) and [LLM-Agent-Paper-List's repository](https://github.com/WooooDyy/LLM-Agent-Paper-List).

| | [OpenRLHF](/tools/openrlhf-openrlhf.md) | [LLM-Agent-Paper-List](/tools/woooodyy-llm-agent-paper-list.md) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Tagline | Scalable and High-performance Agentic RL Framework based on Ray | Must-read papers for LLM-based agents. |
| Stars | 10,014 | 8,222 |
| Forks | 1,019 | 499 |
| Open issues | 380 | 32 |
| Language | Python | - |
| Adopt for | OpenRLHF is a scalable and high-performance reinforcement learning framework from human feedback, built on Ray for distributed scheduling and vLLM for efficient inference, supporting models up to 70B+ parameters. | LLM-Agent-Paper-List is a curated repository of essential papers on large language model-based agents, focusing on AgentGym, a framework for developing and training LLM agents through reinforcement learning. |
| Persona | - | - |
| Runtime | - | - |
| License | Apache-2.0 | - |
| Categories | Inference & Serving, Model Training | AI Agents, Evaluation & Observability, Model Training |

## Trust and health

_Sourced signals - not a safety guarantee. No winner column._

| | [OpenRLHF](/tools/openrlhf-openrlhf.md) | [LLM-Agent-Paper-List](/tools/woooodyy-llm-agent-paper-list.md) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Maintenance | Very active (96%) | Dormant (18%) |
| Days since push | 1d | 371d |
| Open issues (now) | 380 | 32 |
| Stars delta | +123 (30d) | +50 (30d) |
| Open issues delta | +13 (30d) | +1 (30d) |
| Owner type | Organization | User |
| Full report | [trust report](/tools/openrlhf-openrlhf/trust.md) | [trust report](/tools/woooodyy-llm-agent-paper-list/trust.md) |

## Decision facts: OpenRLHF

- **Adopt for:** OpenRLHF is a scalable and high-performance reinforcement learning framework from human feedback, built on Ray for distributed scheduling and vLLM for efficient inference, supporting models up to 70B+ parameters.

## Decision facts: LLM-Agent-Paper-List

- **Adopt for:** LLM-Agent-Paper-List is a curated repository of essential papers on large language model-based agents, focusing on AgentGym, a framework for developing and training LLM agents through reinforcement learning.

## Choose when

### Choose OpenRLHF if…

- Tags unique to OpenRLHF: proximal-policy-optimization, raylib, reinforcement-learning-from-human-feedba, transformers.
- Also covers Inference & Serving.
- When you need to train large models up to 70B+ parameters with efficient distributed scheduling and high-performance inference.

### Choose LLM-Agent-Paper-List if…

- Tags unique to LLM-Agent-Paper-List: agent, evaluation, llm, nlp.
- Also covers AI Agents, Evaluation & Observability.
- When you need a comprehensive list of must-read papers on LLM-based agents, including detailed insights into AgentGym, a framework for developing and training LLM agents through reinforcement learning

## When NOT to use OpenRLHF

- If your project does not require support for large models or distributed training, as OpenRLHF's complexity and resource requirements may be unnecessary.
- When you prefer a framework that does not rely on Ray for distributed scheduling, as OpenRLHF's architecture is tightly coupled with Ray for its distributed capabilities.

## When NOT to use LLM-Agent-Paper-List

- If you are looking for a tool that focuses on a broader range of AI agent development beyond LLM-based agents, as LLM-Agent-Paper-List is specifically curated for LLM-based agents
- When you need real-time updates or a dynamic list of papers, as the repository is a static list and does not automatically update with new publications
- If you require a tool that includes practical code implementations for all listed papers, as the repository primarily serves as a list and does not provide comprehensive code for every paper

## Common questions

### What is the difference between OpenRLHF and LLM-Agent-Paper-List?

OpenRLHF: Scalable and High-performance Agentic RL Framework based on Ray. LLM-Agent-Paper-List: Must-read papers for LLM-based agents.. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.

### When should I choose OpenRLHF over LLM-Agent-Paper-List?

Choose OpenRLHF over LLM-Agent-Paper-List when Tags unique to OpenRLHF: proximal-policy-optimization, raylib, reinforcement-learning-from-human-feedba, transformers; Also covers Inference & Serving; When you need to train large models up to 70B+ parameters with efficient distributed scheduling and high-performance inference.

### When should I choose LLM-Agent-Paper-List over OpenRLHF?

Choose LLM-Agent-Paper-List over OpenRLHF when Tags unique to LLM-Agent-Paper-List: agent, evaluation, llm, nlp; Also covers AI Agents, Evaluation & Observability; When you need a comprehensive list of must-read papers on LLM-based agents, including detailed insights into AgentGym, a framework for developing and training LLM agents through reinforcement learning.

### When should I avoid OpenRLHF?

If your project does not require support for large models or distributed training, as OpenRLHF's complexity and resource requirements may be unnecessary. When you prefer a framework that does not rely on Ray for distributed scheduling, as OpenRLHF's architecture is tightly coupled with Ray for its distributed capabilities.

### When should I avoid LLM-Agent-Paper-List?

If you are looking for a tool that focuses on a broader range of AI agent development beyond LLM-based agents, as LLM-Agent-Paper-List is specifically curated for LLM-based agents When you need real-time updates or a dynamic list of papers, as the repository is a static list and does not automatically update with new publications If you require a tool that includes practical code implementations for all listed papers, as the repository primarily serves as a list and does not provide comprehensive code for every paper

### Is OpenRLHF or LLM-Agent-Paper-List more popular on GitHub?

OpenRLHF has more GitHub stars (10,014 vs 8,222). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.

### Are OpenRLHF and LLM-Agent-Paper-List open source?

Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub.

### Where can I find alternatives to OpenRLHF or LLM-Agent-Paper-List?

GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at [OpenRLHF alternatives](/tools/openrlhf-openrlhf/alternatives) and [LLM-Agent-Paper-List alternatives](/tools/woooodyy-llm-agent-paper-list/alternatives) ([OpenRLHF markdown twin](/tools/openrlhf-openrlhf/alternatives.md), [LLM-Agent-Paper-List markdown twin](/tools/woooodyy-llm-agent-paper-list/alternatives.md)), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.

### Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?

Yes. The markdown twin at [this comparison](/compare/openrlhf-openrlhf-vs-woooodyy-llm-agent-paper-list.md) mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.

### Which is better maintained, OpenRLHF or LLM-Agent-Paper-List?

OpenRLHF: Very active. LLM-Agent-Paper-List: Dormant. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.

### Where are the full trust reports for OpenRLHF and LLM-Agent-Paper-List?

GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: [OpenRLHF trust report](/tools/openrlhf-openrlhf/trust); [LLM-Agent-Paper-List trust report](/tools/woooodyy-llm-agent-paper-list/trust).

---

**Machine-readable endpoints**

- JSON: [`/api/graphcanon/graph?tool=openrlhf-openrlhf`](/api/graphcanon/graph?tool=openrlhf-openrlhf)
- LLM index: [/llms.txt](/llms.txt)
- Full corpus: [/llms-full.txt](/llms-full.txt)

_GraphCanon - The knowledge graph for AI development. https://www.graphcanon.com/_
