---
title: "Agent-Reach vs plexiglass"
type: "comparison"
canonical_url: "https://www.graphcanon.com/compare/panniantong-agent-reach-vs-safellama-plexiglass"
tools: ["panniantong-agent-reach", "safellama-plexiglass"]
---

# Agent-Reach vs plexiglass

*GraphCanon updated Jul 11, 2026*

## Verdict

Pick Agent-Reach when license: Agent-Reach is MIT, plexiglass is Apache-2.0; pick plexiglass when license: plexiglass is Apache-2.0, Agent-Reach is MIT.

[Agent-Reach](https://github.com/Panniantong/Agent-Reach) reports 55k GitHub stars, 4.5k forks, and 144 open issues, last pushed Jul 10, 2026. [plexiglass](https://github.com/safellama/plexiglass) has 153 stars, 18 forks, and 0 open issues, last pushed Feb 4, 2026. Figures are from public GitHub metadata via [Agent-Reach's repository](https://github.com/Panniantong/Agent-Reach) and [plexiglass's repository](https://github.com/safellama/plexiglass).

| | [Agent-Reach](/tools/panniantong-agent-reach.md) | [plexiglass](/tools/safellama-plexiglass.md) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Tagline | Give your AI agent eyes to see the entire internet. Read & search Twitter, Reddit, YouTube, GitHub, Bilibili, XiaoHongShu — one CLI, zero API fees. | A toolkit for detecting and protecting against vulnerabilities in Large Language Models (LLMs). |
| Stars | 54,715 | 153 |
| Forks | 4,509 | 18 |
| Open issues | 144 | 0 |
| Language | Python | Python |
| Adopt for | - | - |
| Persona | - | - |
| Runtime | - | - |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Categories | AI Agents, Developer Tools, LLM Frameworks | Developer Tools, LLM Frameworks |

## Trust and health

_Sourced signals - not a safety guarantee. No winner column._

| | [Agent-Reach](/tools/panniantong-agent-reach.md) | [plexiglass](/tools/safellama-plexiglass.md) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Maintenance | Very active (96%) | Slowing (36%) |
| Days since push | 0d | 157d |
| Open issues (now) | 144 | 0 |
| Owner type | User | Organization |
| Security scan | No MCP manifest | No lockfile |
| Full report | [trust report](/tools/panniantong-agent-reach/trust.md) | [trust report](/tools/safellama-plexiglass/trust.md) |

## Choose when

### Choose Agent-Reach if…

- License: Agent-Reach is MIT, plexiglass is Apache-2.0.
- Tags unique to Agent-Reach: agent-infrastructure, ai-agent, ai-search, automation.
- Also covers AI Agents.

### Choose plexiglass if…

- License: plexiglass is Apache-2.0, Agent-Reach is MIT.
- Tags unique to plexiglass: adversarial-attacks, adversarial-machine-learning, cybersecurity, deep-learning.
- Leaner open-issue backlog (0).

## When NOT to use Agent-Reach

- AI Agents: Don't use an agent loop when a deterministic workflow would do; agents add latency, cost, and non-determinism.
- Developer Tools: A gateway is overkill when you're pinned to a single provider and model.
- LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves.

## When NOT to use plexiglass

- Last GitHub push was 157 days ago (slowing maintenance, Feb 4, 2026). Validate activity before betting a new project on plexiglass.
- Developer Tools: A gateway is overkill when you're pinned to a single provider and model.
- LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves.

## Common questions

### What is the difference between Agent-Reach and plexiglass?

Agent-Reach: Give your AI agent eyes to see the entire internet. Read & search Twitter, Reddit, YouTube, GitHub, Bilibili, XiaoHongShu — one CLI, zero API fees.. plexiglass: A toolkit for detecting and protecting against vulnerabilities in Large Language Models (LLMs).. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.

### When should I choose Agent-Reach over plexiglass?

Choose Agent-Reach over plexiglass when License: Agent-Reach is MIT, plexiglass is Apache-2.0; Tags unique to Agent-Reach: agent-infrastructure, ai-agent, ai-search, automation; Also covers AI Agents.

### When should I choose plexiglass over Agent-Reach?

Choose plexiglass over Agent-Reach when License: plexiglass is Apache-2.0, Agent-Reach is MIT; Tags unique to plexiglass: adversarial-attacks, adversarial-machine-learning, cybersecurity, deep-learning; Leaner open-issue backlog (0).

### When should I avoid Agent-Reach?

AI Agents: Don't use an agent loop when a deterministic workflow would do; agents add latency, cost, and non-determinism. Developer Tools: A gateway is overkill when you're pinned to a single provider and model. LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves.

### When should I avoid plexiglass?

Last GitHub push was 157 days ago (slowing maintenance, Feb 4, 2026). Validate activity before betting a new project on plexiglass. Developer Tools: A gateway is overkill when you're pinned to a single provider and model. LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves.

### Is Agent-Reach or plexiglass more popular on GitHub?

Agent-Reach has more GitHub stars (54,715 vs 153). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.

### Are Agent-Reach and plexiglass open source?

Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (Agent-Reach: MIT, plexiglass: Apache-2.0).

### Where can I find alternatives to Agent-Reach or plexiglass?

GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at [Agent-Reach alternatives](/tools/panniantong-agent-reach/alternatives) and [plexiglass alternatives](/tools/safellama-plexiglass/alternatives) ([Agent-Reach markdown twin](/tools/panniantong-agent-reach/alternatives.md), [plexiglass markdown twin](/tools/safellama-plexiglass/alternatives.md)), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.

### Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?

Yes. The markdown twin at [this comparison](/compare/panniantong-agent-reach-vs-safellama-plexiglass.md) mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.

### Which is better maintained, Agent-Reach or plexiglass?

Agent-Reach: Very active. plexiglass: Slowing. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.

### Where are the full trust reports for Agent-Reach and plexiglass?

GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: [Agent-Reach trust report](/tools/panniantong-agent-reach/trust); [plexiglass trust report](/tools/safellama-plexiglass/trust).

---

**Machine-readable endpoints**

- JSON: [`/api/graphcanon/graph?tool=panniantong-agent-reach`](/api/graphcanon/graph?tool=panniantong-agent-reach)
- LLM index: [/llms.txt](/llms.txt)
- Full corpus: [/llms-full.txt](/llms-full.txt)

_GraphCanon - The knowledge graph for AI development. https://www.graphcanon.com/_
