---
title: "llm-app vs Scrapegraph-ai"
type: "comparison"
canonical_url: "https://www.graphcanon.com/compare/pathwaycom-llm-app-vs-scrapegraphai-scrapegraph-ai"
tools: ["pathwaycom-llm-app", "scrapegraphai-scrapegraph-ai"]
---

# llm-app vs Scrapegraph-ai

*GraphCanon updated Aug 16, 2026*

## Verdict

Pick llm-app if llm-app offers pre-configured cloud deployment templates designed specifically for creating AI-driven applications such as chatbots and machine learning projects leveraging Hugging Face models. It supports direct integrz; pick Scrapegraph-ai if scrapegraph-ai is a Python-based scraping tool leveraging AI for smarter data extraction and search tasks.

[llm-app](https://pathway.com/developers/templates/) reports 59k GitHub stars, 1.5k forks, and 8 open issues, last pushed Jul 5, 2026. [Scrapegraph-ai](https://scrapegraphai.com) has 30k stars, 2.9k forks, and 12 open issues, last pushed Jul 20, 2026. Figures are from public GitHub metadata via [llm-app's repository](https://github.com/pathwaycom/llm-app) and [Scrapegraph-ai's repository](https://github.com/ScrapeGraphAI/Scrapegraph-ai).

| | [llm-app](/tools/pathwaycom-llm-app.md) | [Scrapegraph-ai](/tools/scrapegraphai-scrapegraph-ai.md) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Tagline | Ready-to-run cloud templates for RAG, AI pipelines, and enterprise search with live data. | Python scraper based on AI |
| Stars | 59,037 | 29,618 |
| Forks | 1,466 | 2,925 |
| Open issues | 8 | 12 |
| Language | Jupyter Notebook | Python |
| Adopt for | llm-app offers pre-configured cloud deployment templates designed specifically for creating AI-driven applications such as chatbots and machine learning projects leveraging Hugging Face models. It supports direct integrz | Scrapegraph-ai is a Python-based scraping tool leveraging AI for smarter data extraction and search tasks. |
| Persona | - | - |
| Runtime | - | - |
| License | MIT | Scrapegraph-ai operates under the MIT License, offering users flexible rights for modification and distribution of the code. |
| Categories | Data & Retrieval, LLM Frameworks, Vector Databases | Data & Retrieval, LLM Frameworks |

## Trust and health

_Sourced signals - not a safety guarantee. No winner column._

| | [llm-app](/tools/pathwaycom-llm-app.md) | [Scrapegraph-ai](/tools/scrapegraphai-scrapegraph-ai.md) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Maintenance | Steady (60%) | Active (82%) |
| Days since push | 41d | 27d |
| Open issues (now) | 8 | 12 |
| Stars delta | +11 (30d) | +1.2k (30d) |
| Open issues delta | -2 (30d) | +5 (30d) |
| Full report | [trust report](/tools/pathwaycom-llm-app/trust.md) | [trust report](/tools/scrapegraphai-scrapegraph-ai/trust.md) |

## Decision facts: llm-app

- **Requirements:** Requires Docker; The tool is Docker-friendly and designed to ensure synchronization with cloud-based storage solutions among others.
- **Adopt for:** llm-app offers pre-configured cloud deployment templates designed specifically for creating AI-driven applications such as chatbots and machine learning projects leveraging Hugging Face models. It supports direct integrz

## Decision facts: Scrapegraph-ai

- **Pricing:** freemium - Free to use with potential charges for advanced features or premium services, as specified by its license.
- **Requirements:** Developed in Python and can leverage existing libraries and frameworks related to AI and web scraping.
- **Adopt for:** Scrapegraph-ai is a Python-based scraping tool leveraging AI for smarter data extraction and search tasks.
- **License detail:** Scrapegraph-ai operates under the MIT License, offering users flexible rights for modification and distribution of the code.

## Choose when

### Choose llm-app if…

- llm-app is primarily Jupyter Notebook; Scrapegraph-ai is Python.
- Requirements: Requires Docker; The tool is Docker-friendly and designed to ensure synchronization with cloud-based storage solutions among others..
- Tags unique to llm-app: chatbot, hugging-face, retrieval-augmented-generation, vector-database.
- Also covers Vector Databases.
- - You need a ready-to-run solution that directly integrates with various data sources like Sharepoint, Google Drive, S3, Kafka, PostgreSQL, and live APIs.

### Choose Scrapegraph-ai if…

- Scrapegraph-ai is primarily Python; llm-app is Jupyter Notebook.
- Pricing: Free to use with potential charges for advanced features or premium services, as specified by its license..
- Requirements: Developed in Python and can leverage existing libraries and frameworks related to AI and web scraping..
- Tags unique to Scrapegraph-ai: ai-crawler, crawler, data-extraction, large-language-model.
- Scrapegraph-ai ships Docker support for self-hosted deployment.
- When you need advanced AI capabilities to parse and understand the context of scraped web content.

## When NOT to use llm-app

- - You require custom deployment configurations that extend beyond the pre-set cloud templates available through llm-app.
- - There’s a need for tightly integrated support with data sources or APIs not explicitly mentioned, such as specialized CRM systems (Salesforce), which may lack direct template support in llm-app.

## When NOT to use Scrapegraph-ai

- If you have simple and straightforward data extraction needs that do not require AI-powered intelligence.
- When your project aims to scrape static or relatively unchanging datasets from websites with well-defined structures, as Scrapegraph-ai is more geared towards complex and dynamic scraping tasks where

## Common questions

### What is the difference between llm-app and Scrapegraph-ai?

llm-app: Ready-to-run cloud templates for RAG, AI pipelines, and enterprise search with live data.. Scrapegraph-ai: Python scraper based on AI. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.

### When should I choose llm-app over Scrapegraph-ai?

Choose llm-app over Scrapegraph-ai when llm-app is primarily Jupyter Notebook; Scrapegraph-ai is Python; Requirements: Requires Docker; The tool is Docker-friendly and designed to ensure synchronization with cloud-based storage solutions among others.; Tags unique to llm-app: chatbot, hugging-face, retrieval-augmented-generation, vector-database; Also covers Vector Databases; - You need a ready-to-run solution that directly integrates with various data sources like Sharepoint, Google Drive, S3, Kafka, PostgreSQL, and live APIs.

### When should I choose Scrapegraph-ai over llm-app?

Choose Scrapegraph-ai over llm-app when Scrapegraph-ai is primarily Python; llm-app is Jupyter Notebook; Pricing: Free to use with potential charges for advanced features or premium services, as specified by its license.; Requirements: Developed in Python and can leverage existing libraries and frameworks related to AI and web scraping.; Tags unique to Scrapegraph-ai: ai-crawler, crawler, data-extraction, large-language-model; Scrapegraph-ai ships Docker support for self-hosted deployment; When you need advanced AI capabilities to parse and understand the context of scraped web content.

### When should I avoid llm-app?

- You require custom deployment configurations that extend beyond the pre-set cloud templates available through llm-app. - There’s a need for tightly integrated support with data sources or APIs not explicitly mentioned, such as specialized CRM systems (Salesforce), which may lack direct template support in llm-app.

### When should I avoid Scrapegraph-ai?

If you have simple and straightforward data extraction needs that do not require AI-powered intelligence. When your project aims to scrape static or relatively unchanging datasets from websites with well-defined structures, as Scrapegraph-ai is more geared towards complex and dynamic scraping tasks where

### Is llm-app or Scrapegraph-ai more popular on GitHub?

llm-app has more GitHub stars (59,037 vs 29,618). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.

### Are llm-app and Scrapegraph-ai open source?

Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (llm-app: MIT, Scrapegraph-ai: MIT).

### Where can I find alternatives to llm-app or Scrapegraph-ai?

GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at [llm-app alternatives](/tools/pathwaycom-llm-app/alternatives) and [Scrapegraph-ai alternatives](/tools/scrapegraphai-scrapegraph-ai/alternatives) ([llm-app markdown twin](/tools/pathwaycom-llm-app/alternatives.md), [Scrapegraph-ai markdown twin](/tools/scrapegraphai-scrapegraph-ai/alternatives.md)), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.

### Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?

Yes. The markdown twin at [this comparison](/compare/pathwaycom-llm-app-vs-scrapegraphai-scrapegraph-ai.md) mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.

### Which is better maintained, llm-app or Scrapegraph-ai?

llm-app: Steady. Scrapegraph-ai: Active. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.

### Where are the full trust reports for llm-app and Scrapegraph-ai?

GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: [llm-app trust report](/tools/pathwaycom-llm-app/trust); [Scrapegraph-ai trust report](/tools/scrapegraphai-scrapegraph-ai/trust).

---

**Machine-readable endpoints**

- JSON: [`/api/graphcanon/graph?tool=pathwaycom-llm-app`](/api/graphcanon/graph?tool=pathwaycom-llm-app)
- LLM index: [/llms.txt](/llms.txt)
- Full corpus: [/llms-full.txt](/llms-full.txt)

_GraphCanon - The knowledge graph for AI development. https://www.graphcanon.com/_
