--- title: "artyom.js vs annyang" type: "comparison" canonical_url: "https://www.graphcanon.com/compare/sdkcarlos-artyom-js-vs-talater-annyang" tools: ["sdkcarlos-artyom-js", "talater-annyang"] --- # artyom.js vs annyang *GraphCanon updated Jul 30, 2026* ## Verdict Pick artyom.js if artyom.js is a JavaScript library for integrating voice commands and speech recognition into websites using Google Chrome; pick annyang if annyang enables speech-to-text capabilities for web sites with its TypeScript-based JavaScript library. [artyom.js](http://sdkcarlos.github.io/sites/artyom.html) reports 1.3k GitHub stars, 363 forks, and 73 open issues, last pushed Jan 24, 2023. [annyang](https://www.talater.com/annyang/) has 6.8k stars, 1.0k forks, and 10 open issues, last pushed Jul 14, 2026. Figures are from public GitHub metadata via [artyom.js's repository](https://github.com/sdkcarlos/artyom.js) and [annyang's repository](https://github.com/TalAter/annyang). | | [artyom.js](/tools/sdkcarlos-artyom-js.md) | [annyang](/tools/talater-annyang.md) | | --- | --- | --- | | Tagline | voice control - voice commands - speech recognition and speech synthesis JavaScript library | Speech recognition for your site | | Stars | 1,269 | 6,818 | | Forks | 363 | 1,048 | | Open issues | 73 | 10 | | Language | JavaScript | TypeScript | | Adopt for | artyom.js is a JavaScript library for integrating voice commands and speech recognition into websites using Google Chrome. | annyang enables speech-to-text capabilities for web sites with its TypeScript-based JavaScript library. | | Persona | - | - | | Runtime | - | - | | License | MIT | MIT License: Permissive free software license notice that gives users the freedom to modify and redistribute as long as they provide source credit. | | Categories | Speech & Audio | Speech & Audio | ## Trust and health _Sourced signals - not a safety guarantee. No winner column._ | | [artyom.js](/tools/sdkcarlos-artyom-js.md) | [annyang](/tools/talater-annyang.md) | | --- | --- | --- | | Maintenance | Dormant (18%) | Active (82%) | | Days since push | 1282d | 15d | | Open issues (now) | 73 | 10 | | Full report | [trust report](/tools/sdkcarlos-artyom-js/trust.md) | [trust report](/tools/talater-annyang/trust.md) | ## Shared compatibility - **Node.js**: [artyom.js](/tools/sdkcarlos-artyom-js.md) - Node.js runtime; [annyang](/tools/talater-annyang.md) - Node.js runtime ## Decision facts: artyom.js - **Adopt for:** artyom.js is a JavaScript library for integrating voice commands and speech recognition into websites using Google Chrome. ## Decision facts: annyang - **Pricing:** freemium - Available at no charge with an open-source MIT license, making it suitable for both personal and commercial projects. - **Adopt for:** annyang enables speech-to-text capabilities for web sites with its TypeScript-based JavaScript library. - **License detail:** MIT License: Permissive free software license notice that gives users the freedom to modify and redistribute as long as they provide source credit. ## Choose when ### Choose artyom.js if… - artyom.js is primarily JavaScript; annyang is TypeScript. - Tags unique to artyom.js: recognition, speech-synthesis, voice-commands. - When developing applications that need to be accessible through voice control specifically within Google Chrome environment. ### Choose annyang if… - annyang is primarily TypeScript; artyom.js is JavaScript. - Pricing: Available at no charge with an open-source MIT license, making it suitable for both personal and commercial projects.. - Tags unique to annyang: mit-license, speech, voice. - When you are working on a project that requires integrating voice commands into a website and your tech stack already includes TypeScript or JavaScript. ## When NOT to use artyom.js - If your project requires cross-browser compatibility beyond Google Chrome, as artyom.js is limited to this browser. - In scenarios where you need advanced natural language processing capabilities that extend beyond simple command recognition and response. ## When NOT to use annyang - If the project requires a high level of speech recognition accuracy in noisy environments, as annyang might not perform optimally under such conditions. - For applications demanding real-time transcription with low latency, considering that annang may introduce some delay which could be critical for certain use cases. ## Common questions ### What is the difference between artyom.js and annyang? artyom.js: voice control - voice commands - speech recognition and speech synthesis JavaScript library. annyang: Speech recognition for your site. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories. ### When should I choose artyom.js over annyang? Choose artyom.js over annyang when artyom.js is primarily JavaScript; annyang is TypeScript; Tags unique to artyom.js: recognition, speech-synthesis, voice-commands; When developing applications that need to be accessible through voice control specifically within Google Chrome environment. ### When should I choose annyang over artyom.js? Choose annyang over artyom.js when annyang is primarily TypeScript; artyom.js is JavaScript; Pricing: Available at no charge with an open-source MIT license, making it suitable for both personal and commercial projects.; Tags unique to annyang: mit-license, speech, voice; When you are working on a project that requires integrating voice commands into a website and your tech stack already includes TypeScript or JavaScript. ### When should I avoid artyom.js? If your project requires cross-browser compatibility beyond Google Chrome, as artyom.js is limited to this browser. In scenarios where you need advanced natural language processing capabilities that extend beyond simple command recognition and response. ### When should I avoid annyang? If the project requires a high level of speech recognition accuracy in noisy environments, as annyang might not perform optimally under such conditions. For applications demanding real-time transcription with low latency, considering that annang may introduce some delay which could be critical for certain use cases. ### Is artyom.js or annyang more popular on GitHub? annyang has more GitHub stars (6,818 vs 1,269). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints. ### Are artyom.js and annyang open source? Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (artyom.js: MIT, annyang: MIT). ### Where can I find alternatives to artyom.js or annyang? GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at [artyom.js alternatives](/tools/sdkcarlos-artyom-js/alternatives) and [annyang alternatives](/tools/talater-annyang/alternatives) ([artyom.js markdown twin](/tools/sdkcarlos-artyom-js/alternatives.md), [annyang markdown twin](/tools/talater-annyang/alternatives.md)), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes. ### Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison? Yes. The markdown twin at [this comparison](/compare/sdkcarlos-artyom-js-vs-talater-annyang.md) mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers. ### Which is better maintained, artyom.js or annyang? artyom.js: Dormant. annyang: Active. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance. ### Where are the full trust reports for artyom.js and annyang? GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: [artyom.js trust report](/tools/sdkcarlos-artyom-js/trust); [annyang trust report](/tools/talater-annyang/trust). --- **Machine-readable endpoints** - JSON: [`/api/graphcanon/graph?tool=sdkcarlos-artyom-js`](/api/graphcanon/graph?tool=sdkcarlos-artyom-js) - LLM index: [/llms.txt](/llms.txt) - Full corpus: [/llms-full.txt](/llms-full.txt) _GraphCanon - The knowledge graph for AI development. https://www.graphcanon.com/_