---
title: "awesome vs rm-safely"
type: "comparison"
canonical_url: "https://www.graphcanon.com/compare/sindresorhus-awesome-vs-zdk-rm-safely"
tools: ["sindresorhus-awesome", "zdk-rm-safely"]
---

# awesome vs rm-safely

*GraphCanon updated Jul 15, 2026*

## Verdict

Pick awesome when license: awesome is CC0-1.0, rm-safely is MIT; pick rm-safely when license: rm-safely is MIT, awesome is CC0-1.0.

[awesome](https://github.com/sindresorhus/awesome) reports 484k GitHub stars, 36k forks, and 92 open issues, last pushed Jun 30, 2026. [rm-safely](https://github.com/zdk/rm-safely) has 100 stars, 3 forks, and 0 open issues, last pushed May 30, 2026. Figures are from public GitHub metadata via [awesome's repository](https://github.com/sindresorhus/awesome) and [rm-safely's repository](https://github.com/zdk/rm-safely).

| | [awesome](/tools/sindresorhus-awesome.md) | [rm-safely](/tools/zdk-rm-safely.md) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Tagline | 😎 Awesome lists about all kinds of interesting topics | 'rm' safely – a safety net for rm |
| Stars | 484,026 | 100 |
| Forks | 35,799 | 3 |
| Open issues | 92 | 0 |
| Language | - | Shell |
| Adopt for | A curated collection of resources on a variety of technological topics, emphasizing hardware and robotics. | - |
| Persona | - | - |
| Runtime | - | - |
| License | CC0-1.0 | MIT |
| Categories | Developer Tools | Developer Tools |

## Trust and health

_Sourced signals - not a safety guarantee. No winner column._

| | [awesome](/tools/sindresorhus-awesome.md) | [rm-safely](/tools/zdk-rm-safely.md) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Maintenance | Active (82%) | Steady (60%) |
| Days since push | 11d | 46d |
| Open issues (now) | 92 | 0 |
| Full report | [trust report](/tools/sindresorhus-awesome/trust.md) | [trust report](/tools/zdk-rm-safely/trust.md) |

## Decision facts: awesome

- **Adopt for:** A curated collection of resources on a variety of technological topics, emphasizing hardware and robotics.

## Choose when

### Choose awesome if…

- License: awesome is CC0-1.0, rm-safely is MIT.
- Tags unique to awesome: awesome, awesome-list, lists, resources.
- When you need well-organized access to diverse technical subjects from IoT to robotics

### Choose rm-safely if…

- License: rm-safely is MIT, awesome is CC0-1.0.
- Tags unique to rm-safely: backup, bash, command, command-line.
- Leaner open-issue backlog (0).

## When NOT to use awesome

- If seeking specific coding frameworks or libraries for software development rather than hardware-focused resources
- In scenarios requiring real-time interactive support or forums, as the content is static lists without active discussion

## When NOT to use rm-safely

- Developer Tools: A gateway is overkill when you're pinned to a single provider and model.

## Common questions

### What is the difference between awesome and rm-safely?

awesome: 😎 Awesome lists about all kinds of interesting topics. rm-safely: 'rm' safely – a safety net for rm. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.

### When should I choose awesome over rm-safely?

Choose awesome over rm-safely when License: awesome is CC0-1.0, rm-safely is MIT; Tags unique to awesome: awesome, awesome-list, lists, resources; When you need well-organized access to diverse technical subjects from IoT to robotics.

### When should I choose rm-safely over awesome?

Choose rm-safely over awesome when License: rm-safely is MIT, awesome is CC0-1.0; Tags unique to rm-safely: backup, bash, command, command-line; Leaner open-issue backlog (0).

### When should I avoid awesome?

If seeking specific coding frameworks or libraries for software development rather than hardware-focused resources In scenarios requiring real-time interactive support or forums, as the content is static lists without active discussion

### When should I avoid rm-safely?

Developer Tools: A gateway is overkill when you're pinned to a single provider and model.

### Is awesome or rm-safely more popular on GitHub?

awesome has more GitHub stars (484,026 vs 100). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.

### Are awesome and rm-safely open source?

Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (awesome: CC0-1.0, rm-safely: MIT).

### Where can I find alternatives to awesome or rm-safely?

GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at [awesome alternatives](/tools/sindresorhus-awesome/alternatives) and [rm-safely alternatives](/tools/zdk-rm-safely/alternatives) ([awesome markdown twin](/tools/sindresorhus-awesome/alternatives.md), [rm-safely markdown twin](/tools/zdk-rm-safely/alternatives.md)), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.

### Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?

Yes. The markdown twin at [this comparison](/compare/sindresorhus-awesome-vs-zdk-rm-safely.md) mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.

### Which is better maintained, awesome or rm-safely?

awesome: Active. rm-safely: Steady. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.

### Where are the full trust reports for awesome and rm-safely?

GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: [awesome trust report](/tools/sindresorhus-awesome/trust); [rm-safely trust report](/tools/zdk-rm-safely/trust).

---

**Machine-readable endpoints**

- JSON: [`/api/graphcanon/graph?tool=sindresorhus-awesome`](/api/graphcanon/graph?tool=sindresorhus-awesome)
- LLM index: [/llms.txt](/llms.txt)
- Full corpus: [/llms-full.txt](/llms-full.txt)

_GraphCanon - The knowledge graph for AI development. https://www.graphcanon.com/_
