---
title: "vibecode-playground trust report"
type: "trust-report"
slug: "aestheticsuraj234-vibecode-playground"
canonical_url: "https://www.graphcanon.com/tools/aestheticsuraj234-vibecode-playground/trust"
computed_at: "2026-07-15T11:01:56.857Z"
maintenance_label: "Slowing"
security_status: "no_lockfile"
---

# vibecode-playground trust report

_Sourced [trust signals](/glossary/trust-and-signals/trust-signal) from public GitHub metadata and external security intelligence providers. Not a security guarantee._

## Maintenance

- Label: Slowing (36% recency signal)
- Days since last push: 342
- Methodology: github_public_v1

## Provenance

- GitHub repo id: 977901164
- Not a fork
- Owner type: User
- Computed at: 2026-07-15T11:01:56.857Z
- Methodology: github_public_v1

## Security intelligence

- **OSV dependency advisories**: No lockfile (source not queried)
  - Last query: 2026-07-15T11:01:58.981888+00:00
  - Evidence: https://osv.dev/
- **deps.dev advisories**: Not queried
  - Evidence: https://deps.dev/
- **OpenSSF Scorecard**: Not queried
  - Evidence: https://api.securityscorecards.dev/projects/github.com/Aestheticsuraj234/vibecode-playground
  - Note: Weekly public scans omit some checks at scale.

## Method and caveats

These are heuristics from public GitHub data and external security intelligence providers, sourced and dated. 
"No published findings from this source" is not a guarantee of safety.
See the full methodology: [/trust-methodology](/trust-methodology.md).

## Common questions

### Is vibecode-playground maintained?

GraphCanon rates vibecode-playground "Slowing" (36% maintenance signal from public GitHub metadata, computed today). Last push was 342 days ago. This is a recency heuristic, not a guarantee the project will stay maintained.

### Is vibecode-playground safe to use?

Last scanned today (none profile). Status: No lockfile. Absence of findings in our scan is not a security guarantee - see [trust methodology](/trust-methodology) for scope limits. GraphCanon does not certify vibecode-playground as safe - review maintenance, provenance, and scan findings on this page before adopting.

### Is vibecode-playground a fork?

No. vibecode-playground is not flagged as a fork in GitHub metadata at the time of the last refresh.

### Does vibecode-playground have known security vulnerabilities?

Last scanned today (none profile). Status: No lockfile. Absence of findings in our scan is not a security guarantee - see [trust methodology](/trust-methodology) for scope limits.

### How often is the vibecode-playground trust report updated?

Trust signals refresh on GitHub ingest/refresh cycles and optional dependency/MCP scans. This report was computed today (methodology github_public_v1).

### What does GraphCanon never claim about vibecode-playground?

We never publish a composite safety grade, pen-test endorsement, or "verified secure" label for vibecode-playground. Signals are sourced heuristics with explicit limits - see [trust methodology](/trust-methodology).

### How does GraphCanon assess trust for vibecode-playground?

Signals are sourced from public GitHub metadata and optional dependency/MCP manifest scans, each tagged with methodology version and computed date. GraphCanon does not publish a composite safety grade. Read [trust methodology](/trust-methodology) for full scope and limits.

---

**Machine-readable endpoints**

- JSON: [`/api/graphcanon/tools/aestheticsuraj234-vibecode-playground/trust`](/api/graphcanon/tools/aestheticsuraj234-vibecode-playground/trust)
- LLM index: [/llms.txt](/llms.txt)
- Full corpus: [/llms-full.txt](/llms-full.txt)

_GraphCanon - The knowledge graph for AI development. https://www.graphcanon.com/_