---
title: "automl-gs trust report"
type: "trust-report"
slug: "minimaxir-automl-gs"
canonical_url: "https://www.graphcanon.com/tools/minimaxir-automl-gs/trust"
computed_at: "2026-07-11T23:33:04.720Z"
maintenance_label: "Dormant"
security_status: "findings"
---

# automl-gs trust report

_Sourced [trust signals](/glossary/trust-and-signals/trust-signal) from public GitHub metadata and optional dependency [security scans](/glossary/trust-and-signals/security-scan). Not a security guarantee._

## Maintenance

- Label: Dormant (18% recency signal)
- Days since last push: 2454
- Last release: 2019-04-05T06:51:04Z
- Methodology: github_public_v1

## Provenance

- GitHub repo id: 165542441
- Not a fork
- Owner type: User
- Computed at: 2026-07-11T23:33:04.720Z
- Methodology: github_public_v1

## Security scan

- Status: Findings present (0 critical, 2 high, 5 medium, 7 low) · last scan 2026-07-11T23:33:05.073Z

### Findings

- **high**: Jinja2 sandbox escape via string formatting (jinja2@2.8 · CVE-2019-10906 · requirements.txt)
- **medium**: Jinja2 vulnerable to sandbox breakout through attr filter selecting format method (jinja2@2.8 · CVE-2025-27516 · requirements.txt)
- **medium**: Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) in Jinja2 (jinja2@2.8 · CVE-2020-28493 · requirements.txt)
- **medium**: Jinja vulnerable to HTML attribute injection when passing user input as keys to xmlattr filter (jinja2@2.8 · CVE-2024-22195 · requirements.txt)
- **medium**: Jinja vulnerable to HTML attribute injection when passing user input as keys to xmlattr filter (jinja2@2.8 · CVE-2024-34064 · requirements.txt)
- **high**: Jinja2 sandbox escape vulnerability (jinja2@2.8 · CVE-2016-10745 · requirements.txt)
- **medium**: Jinja has a sandbox breakout through indirect reference to format method (jinja2@2.8 · CVE-2024-56326 · requirements.txt)
- **low**: PYSEC-2019-217 (jinja2@2.8 · CVE-2019-10906 · requirements.txt)
- **low**: PYSEC-2019-220 (jinja2@2.8 · CVE-2016-10745 · requirements.txt)
- **low**: PYSEC-2021-66 (jinja2@2.8 · CVE-2020-28493 · requirements.txt)
- **low**: Jinja2 vulnerable to sandbox breakout through attr filter selecting format method (jinja2@2.8 · CVE-2025-27516 · requirements.txt)
- **low**: Jinja vulnerable to HTML attribute injection when passing user input as keys to xmlattr filter (jinja2@2.8 · CVE-2024-22195 · requirements.txt)
- **low**: Jinja vulnerable to HTML attribute injection when passing user input as keys to xmlattr filter (jinja2@2.8 · CVE-2024-34064 · requirements.txt)
- **low**: Jinja has a sandbox breakout through indirect reference to format method (jinja2@2.8 · CVE-2024-56326 · requirements.txt)

## Method and caveats

These are heuristics from public GitHub data and optional dependency scans, sourced and dated. 
"No criticals found on 2026-07-11" is not a guarantee of safety.
See the full methodology: [/trust-methodology](/trust-methodology.md).

## Common questions

### Is automl-gs maintained?

GraphCanon rates automl-gs "Dormant" (18% maintenance signal from public GitHub metadata, computed today). Last push was 2454 days ago. This is a recency heuristic, not a guarantee the project will stay maintained.

### Is automl-gs safe to use?

Last scanned today (deps profile). Status: 2 high, 5 medium, 7 low - 2 high, 5 medium, 7 low finding(s) in the latest scan. GraphCanon does not claim the project is safe or vulnerability-free; review findings on the trust report. GraphCanon does not certify automl-gs as safe - review maintenance, provenance, and scan findings on this page before adopting.

### Is automl-gs a fork?

No. automl-gs is not flagged as a fork in GitHub metadata at the time of the last refresh.

### Does automl-gs have known security vulnerabilities?

Last scanned today (deps profile). Status: 2 high, 5 medium, 7 low - 2 high, 5 medium, 7 low finding(s) in the latest scan. GraphCanon does not claim the project is safe or vulnerability-free; review findings on the trust report.

### How often is the automl-gs trust report updated?

Trust signals refresh on GitHub ingest/refresh cycles and optional dependency/MCP scans. This report was computed today (methodology github_public_v1).

### What does GraphCanon never claim about automl-gs?

We never publish a composite safety grade, pen-test endorsement, or "verified secure" label for automl-gs. Signals are sourced heuristics with explicit limits - see [trust methodology](/trust-methodology).

### How does GraphCanon assess trust for automl-gs?

Signals are sourced from public GitHub metadata and optional dependency/MCP manifest scans, each tagged with methodology version and computed date. GraphCanon does not publish a composite safety grade. Read [trust methodology](/trust-methodology) for full scope and limits.

---

**Machine-readable endpoints**

- JSON: [`/api/graphcanon/tools/minimaxir-automl-gs/trust`](/api/graphcanon/tools/minimaxir-automl-gs/trust)
- LLM index: [/llms.txt](/llms.txt)
- Full corpus: [/llms-full.txt](/llms-full.txt)

_GraphCanon - The knowledge graph for AI development. https://www.graphcanon.com/_