Home/Compare/activepieces vs waggle-dance

Comparison

activepieces vs waggle-dance

Verdict

Pick activepieces if activePieces is an open-source platform for building and managing AI-powered workflows and agents through MCP (Microservices Control Plane) servers, enabling advanced automation tailored to complex needs; pick waggle-dance if waggle-dance is an AI-driven knowledge work automation tool built in TypeScript with experimental concurrent agent execution for faster task resolution.

Markdown twin · activepieces alternatives · waggle-dance alternatives

GraphCanon updated 6d

activepieces logo

activepieces

activepieces/activepieces

24kpushed Aug 19, 2026
vs
waggle-dance logo

waggle-dance

agi-merge/waggle-dance

171pushed Dec 17, 2023

Trust & integrity

Signalactivepieceswaggle-dance
Maintenance
Very active (0d since push)
As of 6d · github_public_v1
Archived (971d since push)
As of 1w · github_public_v1
Provenance
Not a fork · Organization account
As of 6d · github_public_v1
Not a fork · Organization account
As of 1w · github_public_v1
OSV dependency advisories
No lockfile (source not queried)
As of 1w · osv@v1
No lockfile (source not queried)
As of 1mo · osv@v1
deps.dev advisories
Not queried
deps.dev@v1
Not queried
deps.dev@v1
OpenSSF Scorecard
Not queried
openssf-scorecard@v1
Not queried
openssf-scorecard@v1

Tagline

activepieces
AI Agents & MCPs & AI Workflow Automation
waggle-dance
Knowledge work automation with AI agents

Stars

activepieces
24k
waggle-dance
171

Forks

activepieces
4.1k
waggle-dance
12

Open issues

activepieces
476
waggle-dance
0

Language

activepieces
TypeScript
waggle-dance
TypeScript

Adopt for

activepieces
ActivePieces is an open-source platform for building and managing AI-powered workflows and agents through MCP (Microservices Control Plane) servers, enabling advanced automation tailored to complex needs.
waggle-dance
Waggle-dance is an AI-driven knowledge work automation tool built in TypeScript with experimental concurrent agent execution for faster task resolution.

Persona

activepieces
-
waggle-dance
-

Runtime

activepieces
-
waggle-dance
-

License

activepieces
ActivePieces offers its Community Edition under the MIT license promoting free and open distribution. However, enterprise features come with a Commercial License which restricts usage based on terms
waggle-dance
MIT

Last pushed

activepieces
Aug 19, 2026
waggle-dance
Dec 17, 2023

Categories

activepieces
AI Agents
waggle-dance
AI Agents, Model Training

Trust and health

Maintenance

activepieces
Very active (96%)
waggle-dance
Archived (8%)

Days since push

activepieces
0d
waggle-dance
971d

Archived on GitHub

activepieces
No
waggle-dance
Yes

Open issues (now)

activepieces
476
waggle-dance
0

Stars delta

activepieces
+562 (30d)
waggle-dance
0 (30d)

Open issues delta

activepieces
+42 (30d)
waggle-dance
0 (30d)

Full report

activepieces
Trust report
waggle-dance
Trust report

Choose activepieces if…

  • License: activepieces is Other, waggle-dance is MIT.
  • Pricing: The pricing details are not fully disclosed in the repository but can be accessed through their official site..
  • Requirements: While specific system requirements aren’t detailed, its capabilities suggest a substantial hardware investment for larger implementations. Docker isn't required.
  • Tags unique to activepieces: ai-agent, ai-agents-framework, mcp-server, n8n-alternative.
  • - You need a robust solution for managing up to ~400 MCP servers dedicated for AI agents.

When NOT to use activepieces

  • - If the project's scale is limited, as ActivePieces is designed with extensive scalability (up to ~400 MCP servers) potentially offering more firepower than necessary for small tasks.
  • - When absolute no-code solutions are preferred, since while ActivePieces aims at simplifying AI workflow automation, it does require some coding knowledge in TypeScript.

Choose waggle-dance if…

  • License: waggle-dance is MIT, activepieces is Other.
  • Tags unique to waggle-dance: agent, autogpt, langchain, weaviate.
  • Also covers Model Training.
  • You need a system that prioritizes speed and concurrency in executing tasks

When NOT to use waggle-dance

  • Your project demands high stability over experimental features
  • You require extensive customization of agent execution behavior beyond what Waggle-dance offers initially

Explore

Sources

Every stat on this page traces to a dated GitHub sync, license file, enrichment field, or trust scan.

GitHub stars on cards: activepieces 24k · waggle-dance 171 (synced Aug 20, 2026).

Common questions

What is the difference between activepieces and waggle-dance?
activepieces: AI Agents & MCPs & AI Workflow Automation. waggle-dance: Knowledge work automation with AI agents. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.
When should I choose activepieces over waggle-dance?
Choose activepieces over waggle-dance when License: activepieces is Other, waggle-dance is MIT; Pricing: The pricing details are not fully disclosed in the repository but can be accessed through their official site.; Requirements: While specific system requirements aren’t detailed, its capabilities suggest a substantial hardware investment for larger implementations. Docker isn't required; Tags unique to activepieces: ai-agent, ai-agents-framework, mcp-server, n8n-alternative; - You need a robust solution for managing up to ~400 MCP servers dedicated for AI agents.
When should I choose waggle-dance over activepieces?
Choose waggle-dance over activepieces when License: waggle-dance is MIT, activepieces is Other; Tags unique to waggle-dance: agent, autogpt, langchain, weaviate; Also covers Model Training; You need a system that prioritizes speed and concurrency in executing tasks.
When should I avoid activepieces?
- If the project's scale is limited, as ActivePieces is designed with extensive scalability (up to ~400 MCP servers) potentially offering more firepower than necessary for small tasks. - When absolute no-code solutions are preferred, since while ActivePieces aims at simplifying AI workflow automation, it does require some coding knowledge in TypeScript.
When should I avoid waggle-dance?
Your project demands high stability over experimental features You require extensive customization of agent execution behavior beyond what Waggle-dance offers initially
Is activepieces or waggle-dance more popular on GitHub?
activepieces has more GitHub stars (23,903 vs 171). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.
Are activepieces and waggle-dance open source?
Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (activepieces: Other, waggle-dance: MIT).
Where can I find alternatives to activepieces or waggle-dance?
GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at activepieces alternatives and waggle-dance alternatives (activepieces markdown twin, waggle-dance markdown twin), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.
Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?
Yes. The markdown twin at this comparison mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.
Which is better maintained, activepieces or waggle-dance?
activepieces: Very active. waggle-dance: Archived. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.
Where are the full trust reports for activepieces and waggle-dance?
GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: activepieces trust report; waggle-dance trust report.

Was this helpful?

Anonymous feedback helps us improve pages and translations.