Comparison
activepieces vs trigger.dev
Verdict
Pick activepieces if activepieces is a TypeScript-based platform for AI agents and workflow automation, featuring MCP servers for AI agents. It is released under the MIT license for the Community Edition and a Commercial License for the full; pick trigger.dev if trigger.dev provides both cloud-managed and self-hosting options for deploying AI agents and workflows, with its platform built using TypeScript.
Markdown twin · activepieces alternatives · trigger.dev alternatives
GraphCanon updated Sep 30, 2026
13views this month
vs
Trust & integrity
| Signal | activepieces | trigger.dev |
|---|---|---|
| Maintenance | Very active (1d since push) As of Sep 20, 2026 · github_public_v1 | Very active (0d since push) As of Sep 20, 2026 · github_public_v1 |
| Provenance | Not a fork · Organization account As of Sep 20, 2026 · github_public_v1 | Not a fork · Organization account As of Sep 20, 2026 · github_public_v1 |
| OSV dependency advisories | No lockfile (source not queried) As of Aug 16, 2026 · osv@v1 | No lockfile (source not queried) As of Jul 11, 2026 · osv@v1 |
| deps.dev advisories | Not queried deps.dev@v1 | Not queried deps.dev@v1 |
| OpenSSF Scorecard | Not queried openssf-scorecard@v1 | Not queried openssf-scorecard@v1 |
Tagline
- activepieces
- AI Agents & MCPs & AI Workflow Automation
- trigger.dev
- Build and deploy fully-managed AI agents and workflows
Stars
- activepieces
- 25k
- trigger.dev
- 16k
Forks
- activepieces
- 4.2k
- trigger.dev
- 1.5k
Open issues
- activepieces
- 567
- trigger.dev
- 336
Language
- activepieces
- TypeScript
- trigger.dev
- TypeScript
Adopt for
- activepieces
- Activepieces is a TypeScript-based platform for AI agents and workflow automation, featuring MCP servers for AI agents. It is released under the MIT license for the Community Edition and a Commercial License for the full
- trigger.dev
- Trigger.dev provides both cloud-managed and self-hosting options for deploying AI agents and workflows, with its platform built using TypeScript.
Persona
- activepieces
- -
- trigger.dev
- -
Runtime
- activepieces
- -
- trigger.dev
- -
License
- activepieces
- Other
- trigger.dev
- Apache-2.0
Last pushed
- activepieces
- Sep 18, 2026
- trigger.dev
- Sep 20, 2026
Categories
- activepieces
- AI Agents
- trigger.dev
- AI Agents
Trust and health
Days since push
- activepieces
- 1d
- trigger.dev
- 0d
Open issues (now)
- activepieces
- 567
- trigger.dev
- 336
Stars delta
- activepieces
- +681 (30d)
- trigger.dev
- +277 (30d)
Open issues delta
- activepieces
- +91 (30d)
- trigger.dev
- -104 (30d)
Full report
- activepieces
- Trust report
- trigger.dev
- Trust report
Choose activepieces if…
- License: activepieces is Other, trigger.dev is Apache-2.0.
- Tags unique to activepieces: ai-agent, ai-agents-framework, mcp, mcps.
- activepieces ships Docker support for self-hosted deployment.
- When you need a platform that supports AI agents and workflow automation with a focus on MCP servers for AI agents.
When NOT to use activepieces
- If you prefer a fully open-source solution without the option for enterprise features under a commercial license.
- When you need a platform that does not focus on MCP servers for AI agents, as Activepieces heavily integrates this feature.
- If you are looking for a solution that is not based on TypeScript, as Activepieces is specifically developed in this language.
Choose trigger.dev if…
- License: trigger.dev is Apache-2.0, activepieces is Other.
- Requirements: Min 4 GB RAM; Requires Docker; Self-hosting options are provided, but require Docker Compose or Kubernetes setup knowledge..
- Tags unique to trigger.dev: automation, background-jobs, orchestration, scheduler.
- - **Custom Workflows**: If you need to implement complex, custom orchestrations involving different AI tasks that are well-defined and require scalability without managing infrastructure.
When NOT to use trigger.dev
- - **Minimal AI Workloads**: If your AI usage is minimal or sporadic, you might find the overhead of setting up tasks using the SDK to be unnecessary complexity.
- - **Cloud Agnosticism**: Preferring a solution that abstracts away cloud-specific configurations, as Trigger.dev’s focus on cloud-managed services and self-hosting options may require more manual work
- - **Non-TypeScript Ecosystems**: If your project is predominantly in languages other than TypeScript or JavaScript, the available tooling through SDK might not align closely with existing workflows.
Explore
Sources
Every stat on this page traces to a dated GitHub sync, license file, enrichment field, or trust scan.
- GitHub stars (activepieces/activepieces) · observed Sep 20, 2026
- GitHub forks (activepieces/activepieces) · observed Sep 20, 2026
- Last push (activepieces/activepieces) · observed Sep 18, 2026
- License file (Other) · observed Sep 20, 2026
- Decision facts (enrichment) · observed Sep 30, 2026
- Trust scan (lockfile / OSV) · observed Aug 16, 2026
- GitHub stars (triggerdotdev/trigger.dev) · observed Sep 20, 2026
- GitHub forks (triggerdotdev/trigger.dev) · observed Sep 20, 2026
- Last push (triggerdotdev/trigger.dev) · observed Sep 20, 2026
- License file (Apache-2.0) · observed Sep 20, 2026
- Decision facts (enrichment) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- Trust scan (lockfile / OSV) · observed Jul 11, 2026
GitHub stars on cards: activepieces 25k · trigger.dev 16k (synced Sep 20, 2026).
Common questions
- What is the difference between activepieces and trigger.dev?
- activepieces: AI Agents & MCPs & AI Workflow Automation. trigger.dev: Build and deploy fully-managed AI agents and workflows. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.
- When should I choose activepieces over trigger.dev?
- Choose activepieces over trigger.dev when License: activepieces is Other, trigger.dev is Apache-2.0; Tags unique to activepieces: ai-agent, ai-agents-framework, mcp, mcps; activepieces ships Docker support for self-hosted deployment; When you need a platform that supports AI agents and workflow automation with a focus on MCP servers for AI agents.
- When should I choose trigger.dev over activepieces?
- Choose trigger.dev over activepieces when License: trigger.dev is Apache-2.0, activepieces is Other; Requirements: Min 4 GB RAM; Requires Docker; Self-hosting options are provided, but require Docker Compose or Kubernetes setup knowledge.; Tags unique to trigger.dev: automation, background-jobs, orchestration, scheduler; - **Custom Workflows**: If you need to implement complex, custom orchestrations involving different AI tasks that are well-defined and require scalability without managing infrastructure.
- When should I avoid activepieces?
- If you prefer a fully open-source solution without the option for enterprise features under a commercial license. When you need a platform that does not focus on MCP servers for AI agents, as Activepieces heavily integrates this feature. If you are looking for a solution that is not based on TypeScript, as Activepieces is specifically developed in this language.
- When should I avoid trigger.dev?
- - **Minimal AI Workloads**: If your AI usage is minimal or sporadic, you might find the overhead of setting up tasks using the SDK to be unnecessary complexity. - **Cloud Agnosticism**: Preferring a solution that abstracts away cloud-specific configurations, as Trigger.dev’s focus on cloud-managed services and self-hosting options may require more manual work - **Non-TypeScript Ecosystems**: If your project is predominantly in languages other than TypeScript or JavaScript, the available tooling through SDK might not align closely with existing workflows.
- Is activepieces or trigger.dev more popular on GitHub?
- activepieces has more GitHub stars (24,584 vs 16,347). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.
- Are activepieces and trigger.dev open source?
- Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (activepieces: Other, trigger.dev: Apache-2.0).
- Where can I find alternatives to activepieces or trigger.dev?
- GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at activepieces alternatives and trigger.dev alternatives (activepieces markdown twin, trigger.dev markdown twin), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.
- Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?
- Yes. The markdown twin at this comparison mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.
- Which is better maintained, activepieces or trigger.dev?
- activepieces: Very active. trigger.dev: Very active. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.
- Where are the full trust reports for activepieces and trigger.dev?
- GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: activepieces trust report; trigger.dev trust report.