Comparison
activepieces vs trigger.dev
Verdict
Pick activepieces if activePieces is an open-source platform for building and managing AI-powered workflows and agents through MCP (Microservices Control Plane) servers, enabling advanced automation tailored to complex needs; pick trigger.dev if trigger.dev provides both cloud-managed and self-hosting options for deploying AI agents and workflows, with its platform built using TypeScript.
Markdown twin · activepieces alternatives · trigger.dev alternatives
GraphCanon updated 3d
vs
Trust & integrity
| Signal | activepieces | trigger.dev |
|---|---|---|
| Maintenance | Very active (0d since push) As of 1mo · github_public_v1 | Very active (0d since push) As of 4w · github_public_v1 |
| Provenance | Not a fork · Organization account As of 1mo · github_public_v1 | Not a fork · Organization account As of 4w · github_public_v1 |
| OSV dependency advisories | No lockfile (source not queried) As of 3d · osv@v1 | No lockfile (source not queried) As of 1mo · osv@v1 |
| deps.dev advisories | Not queried deps.dev@v1 | Not queried deps.dev@v1 |
| OpenSSF Scorecard | Not queried openssf-scorecard@v1 | Not queried openssf-scorecard@v1 |
Tagline
- activepieces
- AI Agents & MCPs & AI Workflow Automation
- trigger.dev
- Build and deploy fully-managed AI agents and workflows
Stars
- activepieces
- 23k
- trigger.dev
- 16k
Forks
- activepieces
- 3.9k
- trigger.dev
- 1.4k
Open issues
- activepieces
- 434
- trigger.dev
- 400
Language
- activepieces
- TypeScript
- trigger.dev
- TypeScript
Adopt for
- activepieces
- ActivePieces is an open-source platform for building and managing AI-powered workflows and agents through MCP (Microservices Control Plane) servers, enabling advanced automation tailored to complex needs.
- trigger.dev
- Trigger.dev provides both cloud-managed and self-hosting options for deploying AI agents and workflows, with its platform built using TypeScript.
Persona
- activepieces
- -
- trigger.dev
- -
Runtime
- activepieces
- -
- trigger.dev
- -
License
- activepieces
- ActivePieces offers its Community Edition under the MIT license promoting free and open distribution. However, enterprise features come with a Commercial License which restricts usage based on terms
- trigger.dev
- Apache-2.0
Last pushed
- activepieces
- Jul 20, 2026
- trigger.dev
- Jul 20, 2026
Categories
- activepieces
- AI Agents
- trigger.dev
- AI Agents
Trust and health
Open issues (now)
- activepieces
- 434
- trigger.dev
- 400
Full report
- activepieces
- Trust report
- trigger.dev
- Trust report
Choose activepieces if…
- License: activepieces is Other, trigger.dev is Apache-2.0.
- Pricing: The pricing details are not fully disclosed in the repository but can be accessed through their official site..
- Requirements: While specific system requirements aren’t detailed, its capabilities suggest a substantial hardware investment for larger implementations. Docker isn't required.
- Tags unique to activepieces: ai-agent, ai-agents-framework, mcp-server, n8n-alternative.
- activepieces ships Docker support for self-hosted deployment.
- - You need a robust solution for managing up to ~400 MCP servers dedicated for AI agents.
When NOT to use activepieces
- - If the project's scale is limited, as ActivePieces is designed with extensive scalability (up to ~400 MCP servers) potentially offering more firepower than necessary for small tasks.
- - When absolute no-code solutions are preferred, since while ActivePieces aims at simplifying AI workflow automation, it does require some coding knowledge in TypeScript.
Choose trigger.dev if…
- License: trigger.dev is Apache-2.0, activepieces is Other.
- Requirements: Min 4 GB RAM; Requires Docker; Self-hosting options are provided, but require Docker Compose or Kubernetes setup knowledge..
- Tags unique to trigger.dev: ai-agents, automation, background-jobs, orchestration.
- - **Custom Workflows**: If you need to implement complex, custom orchestrations involving different AI tasks that are well-defined and require scalability without managing infrastructure.
When NOT to use trigger.dev
- - **Minimal AI Workloads**: If your AI usage is minimal or sporadic, you might find the overhead of setting up tasks using the SDK to be unnecessary complexity.
- - **Cloud Agnosticism**: Preferring a solution that abstracts away cloud-specific configurations, as Trigger.dev’s focus on cloud-managed services and self-hosting options may require more manual work
- - **Non-TypeScript Ecosystems**: If your project is predominantly in languages other than TypeScript or JavaScript, the available tooling through SDK might not align closely with existing workflows.
Explore
Sources
Every stat on this page traces to a dated GitHub sync, license file, enrichment field, or trust scan.
- GitHub stars (activepieces/activepieces) · observed Jul 20, 2026
- GitHub forks (activepieces/activepieces) · observed Jul 20, 2026
- Last push (activepieces/activepieces) · observed Jul 20, 2026
- License file (Other) · observed Jul 20, 2026
- Decision facts (enrichment) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- Trust scan (lockfile / OSV) · observed Aug 16, 2026
- GitHub stars (triggerdotdev/trigger.dev) · observed Jul 20, 2026
- GitHub forks (triggerdotdev/trigger.dev) · observed Jul 20, 2026
- Last push (triggerdotdev/trigger.dev) · observed Jul 20, 2026
- License file (Apache-2.0) · observed Jul 20, 2026
- Decision facts (enrichment) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- Trust scan (lockfile / OSV) · observed Jul 11, 2026
GitHub stars on cards: activepieces 23k · trigger.dev 16k (synced Jul 20, 2026).
Common questions
- What is the difference between activepieces and trigger.dev?
- activepieces: AI Agents & MCPs & AI Workflow Automation. trigger.dev: Build and deploy fully-managed AI agents and workflows. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.
- When should I choose activepieces over trigger.dev?
- Choose activepieces over trigger.dev when License: activepieces is Other, trigger.dev is Apache-2.0; Pricing: The pricing details are not fully disclosed in the repository but can be accessed through their official site.; Requirements: While specific system requirements aren’t detailed, its capabilities suggest a substantial hardware investment for larger implementations. Docker isn't required; Tags unique to activepieces: ai-agent, ai-agents-framework, mcp-server, n8n-alternative; activepieces ships Docker support for self-hosted deployment; - You need a robust solution for managing up to ~400 MCP servers dedicated for AI agents.
- When should I choose trigger.dev over activepieces?
- Choose trigger.dev over activepieces when License: trigger.dev is Apache-2.0, activepieces is Other; Requirements: Min 4 GB RAM; Requires Docker; Self-hosting options are provided, but require Docker Compose or Kubernetes setup knowledge.; Tags unique to trigger.dev: ai-agents, automation, background-jobs, orchestration; - **Custom Workflows**: If you need to implement complex, custom orchestrations involving different AI tasks that are well-defined and require scalability without managing infrastructure.
- When should I avoid activepieces?
- - If the project's scale is limited, as ActivePieces is designed with extensive scalability (up to ~400 MCP servers) potentially offering more firepower than necessary for small tasks. - When absolute no-code solutions are preferred, since while ActivePieces aims at simplifying AI workflow automation, it does require some coding knowledge in TypeScript.
- When should I avoid trigger.dev?
- - **Minimal AI Workloads**: If your AI usage is minimal or sporadic, you might find the overhead of setting up tasks using the SDK to be unnecessary complexity. - **Cloud Agnosticism**: Preferring a solution that abstracts away cloud-specific configurations, as Trigger.dev’s focus on cloud-managed services and self-hosting options may require more manual work - **Non-TypeScript Ecosystems**: If your project is predominantly in languages other than TypeScript or JavaScript, the available tooling through SDK might not align closely with existing workflows.
- Is activepieces or trigger.dev more popular on GitHub?
- activepieces has more GitHub stars (23,341 vs 15,695). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.
- Are activepieces and trigger.dev open source?
- Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (activepieces: Other, trigger.dev: Apache-2.0).
- Where can I find alternatives to activepieces or trigger.dev?
- GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at activepieces alternatives and trigger.dev alternatives (activepieces markdown twin, trigger.dev markdown twin), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.
- Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?
- Yes. The markdown twin at this comparison mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.
- Which is better maintained, activepieces or trigger.dev?
- activepieces: Very active. trigger.dev: Very active. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.
- Where are the full trust reports for activepieces and trigger.dev?
- GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: activepieces trust report; trigger.dev trust report.