Comparison
ECC vs dust
Verdict
Pick ECC when eCC is primarily JavaScript; dust is TypeScript; pick dust when dust is primarily TypeScript; ECC is JavaScript.
Markdown twin · ECC alternatives · dust alternatives
GraphCanon updated today
Trust & integrity
| Signal | ECC | dust |
|---|---|---|
| Maintenance | Very active (2d since push) As of today · github_public_v1 | Very active (0d since push) As of today · github_public_v1 |
| Provenance | Not a fork · Personal account As of today · github_public_v1 | Not a fork · Organization account As of today · github_public_v1 |
| Security (OSV) | No MCP manifest As of today · mcp_manifest | No lockfile As of today · none |
Tagline
- ECC
- The agent harness performance optimization system for AI agents
- dust
- Custom AI agent platform to speed up your work.
Stars
- ECC
- 228k
- dust
- 1.4k
Forks
- ECC
- 35k
- dust
- 302
Open issues
- ECC
- 93
- dust
- 224
Language
- ECC
- JavaScript
- dust
- TypeScript
Adopt for
- ECC
- ECC is a performance optimization system for AI agents built to enhance skills, instincts, memory, security, and development processes.
- dust
- -
Persona
- ECC
- -
- dust
- -
Runtime
- ECC
- -
- dust
- -
License
- ECC
- MIT
- dust
- MIT
Last pushed
- ECC
- Jul 9, 2026
- dust
- Jul 11, 2026
Categories
- ECC
- AI Agents, Developer Tools
- dust
- AI Agents, LLM Frameworks, Developer Tools
Trust and health
Days since push
- ECC
- 2d
- dust
- 0d
Open issues (now)
- ECC
- 93
- dust
- 224
Owner type
- ECC
- User
- dust
- Organization
Security scan
- ECC
- No MCP manifest
- dust
- No lockfile
Full report
- ECC
- Trust report
- dust
- Trust report
Choose ECC if…
- ECC is primarily JavaScript; dust is TypeScript.
- ECC requires JavaScript environment and is open-source, licensed under MIT. Specific setup details are not provided within repository data.
- Pricing: Being open source with an MIT license, ECC itself is free to use, but additional features or support might incur costs outside of the core project..
- Tags unique to ECC: productivity, claude, claude-code, anthropic.
- When you are specifically working with AI agents like Claude Code and Codex that require advanced performance tuning across multiple dimensions such as skills and memory management.
When NOT to use ECC
- For projects focusing solely on traditional software development workflows without AI components, ECC's specialized tools are not necessary.
- In scenarios where you're working with closed-source or proprietary AI systems that do not allow for the same levels of customization as open platforms like those optimized by ECC.
Choose dust if…
- dust is primarily TypeScript; ECC is JavaScript.
- Tags unique to dust: agents, large-language-models, rust, typescript.
- Also covers LLM Frameworks.
- dust ships Docker support for self-hosted deployment.
When NOT to use dust
- AI Agents: Don't use an agent loop when a deterministic workflow would do; agents add latency, cost, and non-determinism.
- LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves.
- Developer Tools: A gateway is overkill when you're pinned to a single provider and model.
Explore
Sources
Every stat on this page traces to a dated GitHub sync, license file, enrichment field, or trust scan.
- GitHub stars (affaan-m/ECC) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- GitHub forks (affaan-m/ECC) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- Last push (affaan-m/ECC) · observed Jul 9, 2026
- License file (MIT) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- Decision facts (enrichment) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- Trust scan (lockfile / OSV) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- GitHub stars (dust-tt/dust) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- GitHub forks (dust-tt/dust) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- Last push (dust-tt/dust) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- License file (MIT) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- Trust scan (lockfile / OSV) · observed Jul 11, 2026
GitHub stars on cards: ECC 228k · dust 1.4k (synced Jul 11, 2026).
Common questions
- What is the difference between ECC and dust?
- ECC: The agent harness performance optimization system for AI agents. dust: Custom AI agent platform to speed up your work.. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.
- When should I choose ECC over dust?
- Choose ECC over dust when ECC is primarily JavaScript; dust is TypeScript; ECC requires JavaScript environment and is open-source, licensed under MIT. Specific setup details are not provided within repository data; Pricing: Being open source with an MIT license, ECC itself is free to use, but additional features or support might incur costs outside of the core project.; Tags unique to ECC: productivity, claude, claude-code, anthropic; When you are specifically working with AI agents like Claude Code and Codex that require advanced performance tuning across multiple dimensions such as skills and memory management.
- When should I choose dust over ECC?
- Choose dust over ECC when dust is primarily TypeScript; ECC is JavaScript; Tags unique to dust: agents, large-language-models, rust, typescript; Also covers LLM Frameworks; dust ships Docker support for self-hosted deployment.
- When should I avoid ECC?
- For projects focusing solely on traditional software development workflows without AI components, ECC's specialized tools are not necessary. In scenarios where you're working with closed-source or proprietary AI systems that do not allow for the same levels of customization as open platforms like those optimized by ECC.
- When should I avoid dust?
- AI Agents: Don't use an agent loop when a deterministic workflow would do; agents add latency, cost, and non-determinism. LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves. Developer Tools: A gateway is overkill when you're pinned to a single provider and model.
- Is ECC or dust more popular on GitHub?
- ECC has more GitHub stars (228,395 vs 1,413). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.
- Are ECC and dust open source?
- Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (ECC: MIT, dust: MIT).
- Where can I find alternatives to ECC or dust?
- GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at ECC alternatives and dust alternatives (ECC markdown twin, dust markdown twin), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.
- Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?
- Yes. The markdown twin at this comparison mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.
- Which is better maintained, ECC or dust?
- ECC: Very active. dust: Very active. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.
- Where are the full trust reports for ECC and dust?
- GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: ECC trust report; dust trust report.