Home/Compare/PokeClaw vs captain-claw

Comparison

PokeClaw vs captain-claw

Verdict

Pick PokeClaw if pokeClaw is an on-device AI solution for Android control, featuring local processing without cloud reliance and powered by Gemma 4; pick captain-claw if self-hosted ensemble reasoning and agentic coding framework for orchestrating specialist AI agents.

Markdown twin · PokeClaw alternatives · captain-claw alternatives

GraphCanon updated Sep 20, 2026

9views this month

PokeClaw logo

PokeClaw

agents-io/PokeClaw

1.1kpushed Jun 2, 2026
vs
captain-claw logo

captain-claw

kstevica/captain-claw

163pushed Sep 16, 2026

Trust & integrity

SignalPokeClawcaptain-claw
Maintenance
Slowing (109d since push)
As of Sep 20, 2026 · github_public_v1
Very active (3d since push)
As of Sep 20, 2026 · github_public_v1
Provenance
Not a fork · Organization account
As of Sep 20, 2026 · github_public_v1
Not a fork · Personal account
As of Sep 20, 2026 · github_public_v1
OSV dependency advisories
No lockfile (source not queried)
As of Jul 15, 2026 · osv@v1
No lockfile (source not queried)
As of Jul 15, 2026 · osv@v1
deps.dev advisories
Not queried
deps.dev@v1
Not queried
deps.dev@v1
OpenSSF Scorecard
Not queried
openssf-scorecard@v1
Not queried
openssf-scorecard@v1

Tagline

PokeClaw
first on-device AI for controlling Android phone
captain-claw
Self-hosted framework for orchestrating fleets of specialist AI agents

Stars

PokeClaw
1.1k
captain-claw
163

Forks

PokeClaw
149
captain-claw
15

Open issues

PokeClaw
43
captain-claw
0

Language

PokeClaw
Kotlin
captain-claw
Python

Adopt for

PokeClaw
PokeClaw is an on-device AI solution for Android control, featuring local processing without cloud reliance and powered by Gemma 4.
captain-claw
Self-hosted ensemble reasoning and agentic coding framework for orchestrating specialist AI agents

Persona

PokeClaw
-
captain-claw
-

Runtime

PokeClaw
-
captain-claw
-

License

PokeClaw
PokeClaw is distributed under the Apache-2.0 license, allowing for free use in both proprietary and open-source products with attribution.
captain-claw
MIT

Last pushed

PokeClaw
Jun 2, 2026
captain-claw
Sep 16, 2026

Categories

PokeClaw
AI Agents
captain-claw
AI Agents

Trust and health

Maintenance

PokeClaw
Slowing (36%)
captain-claw
Very active (96%)

Days since push

PokeClaw
109d
captain-claw
3d

Open issues (now)

PokeClaw
43
captain-claw
0

Stars delta

PokeClaw
+55 (30d)
captain-claw
+2 (30d)

Open issues delta

PokeClaw
+11 (30d)
captain-claw
0 (30d)

Owner type

PokeClaw
Organization
captain-claw
User

Full report

PokeClaw
Trust report
captain-claw
Trust report

Shared compatibility

  • Python · PokeClaw: Python runtime · captain-claw: Python runtime

Choose PokeClaw if…

  • PokeClaw is primarily Kotlin; captain-claw is Python.
  • License: PokeClaw is Apache-2.0, captain-claw is MIT.
  • Pricing: The core project is free to use thanks to its Apache-2.0 licensing, but potential premium services could unlock more features or support..
  • Tags unique to PokeClaw: accessibility, ai-agent, android-automation, local-llm.
  • You need to control your Android device locally with no internet dependence, as PokeClaw operates fully on-device.

When NOT to use PokeClaw

  • Your use case requires the scalability and power of cloud-based AI services that can support high computational tasks beyond local device capabilities.
  • You need frequent updates and maintenance that typically come from maintaining cloud services; PokeClaw operates independently but may see less rapid feature upgrades.

Choose captain-claw if…

  • captain-claw is primarily Python; PokeClaw is Kotlin.
  • License: captain-claw is MIT, PokeClaw is Apache-2.0.
  • Tags unique to captain-claw: agent-orchestration, agentic-coding, local-friendly, model agnostic.
  • captain-claw ships Docker support for self-hosted deployment.
  • When you need a model-agnostic solution that supports local deployment of multiple AI agents.

When NOT to use captain-claw

  • Avoid if your project needs cloud-based scalable resources, as captain-claw focuses on local setups.
  • If ease-of-use and existing community support are prioritized over self-hosting flexibility.

Explore

Sources

Every stat on this page traces to a dated GitHub sync, license file, enrichment field, or trust scan.

GitHub stars on cards: PokeClaw 1.1k · captain-claw 163 (synced Sep 20, 2026).

Common questions

What is the difference between PokeClaw and captain-claw?
PokeClaw: first on-device AI for controlling Android phone. captain-claw: Self-hosted framework for orchestrating fleets of specialist AI agents. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.
When should I choose PokeClaw over captain-claw?
Choose PokeClaw over captain-claw when PokeClaw is primarily Kotlin; captain-claw is Python; License: PokeClaw is Apache-2.0, captain-claw is MIT; Pricing: The core project is free to use thanks to its Apache-2.0 licensing, but potential premium services could unlock more features or support.; Tags unique to PokeClaw: accessibility, ai-agent, android-automation, local-llm; You need to control your Android device locally with no internet dependence, as PokeClaw operates fully on-device.
When should I choose captain-claw over PokeClaw?
Choose captain-claw over PokeClaw when captain-claw is primarily Python; PokeClaw is Kotlin; License: captain-claw is MIT, PokeClaw is Apache-2.0; Tags unique to captain-claw: agent-orchestration, agentic-coding, local-friendly, model agnostic; captain-claw ships Docker support for self-hosted deployment; When you need a model-agnostic solution that supports local deployment of multiple AI agents.
When should I avoid PokeClaw?
Your use case requires the scalability and power of cloud-based AI services that can support high computational tasks beyond local device capabilities. You need frequent updates and maintenance that typically come from maintaining cloud services; PokeClaw operates independently but may see less rapid feature upgrades.
When should I avoid captain-claw?
Avoid if your project needs cloud-based scalable resources, as captain-claw focuses on local setups. If ease-of-use and existing community support are prioritized over self-hosting flexibility.
Is PokeClaw or captain-claw more popular on GitHub?
PokeClaw has more GitHub stars (1,059 vs 163). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.
Are PokeClaw and captain-claw open source?
Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (PokeClaw: Apache-2.0, captain-claw: MIT).
Where can I find alternatives to PokeClaw or captain-claw?
GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at PokeClaw alternatives and captain-claw alternatives (PokeClaw markdown twin, captain-claw markdown twin), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.
Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?
Yes. The markdown twin at this comparison mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.
Which is better maintained, PokeClaw or captain-claw?
PokeClaw: Slowing. captain-claw: Very active. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.
Where are the full trust reports for PokeClaw and captain-claw?
GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: PokeClaw trust report; captain-claw trust report.

Was this helpful?

Anonymous feedback helps us improve pages and translations.