Comparison
agent-protocol vs openakita
Verdict
Pick agent-protocol if agent-protocol provides a standardized interface for interacting with various AI agents regardless of their underlying tech stack, aiming to ease development, deployment, and benchmarking; pick openakita if decision-relevant data on OpenAkita.
Markdown twin · agent-protocol alternatives · openakita alternatives
GraphCanon updated Sep 5, 2026
6views this month
vs
Trust & integrity
| Signal | agent-protocol | openakita |
|---|---|---|
| Maintenance | Dormant (515d since push) As of Sep 5, 2026 · github_public_v1 | Very active (5d since push) As of Aug 12, 2026 · github_public_v1 |
| Provenance | Not a fork · Organization account As of Sep 5, 2026 · github_public_v1 | Not a fork · Personal account As of Aug 12, 2026 · github_public_v1 |
| OSV dependency advisories | Published findings As of Jul 11, 2026 · osv@v1 | No lockfile (source not queried) As of Jul 15, 2026 · osv@v1 |
| deps.dev advisories | Not queried deps.dev@v1 | Not queried deps.dev@v1 |
| OpenSSF Scorecard | Not queried openssf-scorecard@v1 | Not queried openssf-scorecard@v1 |
Tagline
- agent-protocol
- Common interface for AI agents
- openakita
- An open-source AI assistant framework with skills and agent architecture
Stars
- agent-protocol
- 1.5k
- openakita
- 2.0k
Forks
- agent-protocol
- 186
- openakita
- 268
Open issues
- agent-protocol
- 49
- openakita
- 41
Language
- agent-protocol
- Python
- openakita
- Python
Adopt for
- agent-protocol
- agent-protocol provides a standardized interface for interacting with various AI agents regardless of their underlying tech stack, aiming to ease development, deployment, and benchmarking.
- openakita
- Decision-relevant data on OpenAkita
Persona
- agent-protocol
- -
- openakita
- -
Runtime
- agent-protocol
- -
- openakita
- -
License
- agent-protocol
- MIT
- openakita
- AGPL-3.0
Last pushed
- agent-protocol
- Apr 8, 2025
- openakita
- Aug 6, 2026
Categories
- agent-protocol
- AI Agents
- openakita
- AI Agents
Trust and health
Maintenance
- agent-protocol
- Dormant (18%)
- openakita
- Very active (96%)
Days since push
- agent-protocol
- 515d
- openakita
- 5d
Open issues (now)
- agent-protocol
- 49
- openakita
- 41
Stars delta
- agent-protocol
- -4 (30d)
- openakita
- Unknown
Open issues delta
- agent-protocol
- -1 (30d)
- openakita
- Unknown
Owner type
- agent-protocol
- Organization
- openakita
- User
OSV dependency advisories
- agent-protocol
- Published findings
- openakita
- No lockfile (source not queried)
Full report
- agent-protocol
- Trust report
- openakita
- Trust report
Choose agent-protocol if…
- License: agent-protocol is MIT, openakita is AGPL-3.0.
- Tags unique to agent-protocol: agents, ai-agent, api, auto-gpt.
- When you want to ensure interoperability between different AI agents irrespective of the frameworks used by them.
When NOT to use agent-protocol
- If you are developing an isolated system with no intention to communicate or integrate with other AI agents outside this scope.
- When working in environments where specific, proprietary interfaces provide significantly better performance or features than adhering to a generic protocol could offer.
Choose openakita if…
- License: openakita is AGPL-3.0, agent-protocol is MIT.
- Tags unique to openakita: agent, ai, assistant, automation.
- openakita ships Docker support for self-hosted deployment.
- For developing agents that can be customized with specific modular skills suitable for diverse assistant tasks
When NOT to use openakita
- Avoid if proprietary or non-open source solutions are preferred as OpenAkita's AGPL-3.0 license mandates sharing modifications publicly
- Consider alternatives if a less modular approach is desired, since OpenAkita strongly emphasizes a skills-based agent architecture which may complicate straightforward integrations
Explore
Sources
Every stat on this page traces to a dated GitHub sync, license file, enrichment field, or trust scan.
- GitHub stars (agi-inc/agent-protocol) · observed Sep 5, 2026
- GitHub forks (agi-inc/agent-protocol) · observed Sep 5, 2026
- Last push (agi-inc/agent-protocol) · observed Apr 8, 2025
- License file (MIT) · observed Sep 5, 2026
- Decision facts (enrichment) · observed Jul 16, 2026
- Trust scan (lockfile / OSV) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- GitHub stars (openakita/openakita) · observed Aug 12, 2026
- GitHub forks (openakita/openakita) · observed Aug 12, 2026
- Last push (openakita/openakita) · observed Aug 6, 2026
- License file (AGPL-3.0) · observed Aug 12, 2026
- Decision facts (enrichment) · observed Jul 17, 2026
- Trust scan (lockfile / OSV) · observed Jul 15, 2026
GitHub stars on cards: agent-protocol 1.5k · openakita 2.0k (synced Sep 5, 2026).
Common questions
- What is the difference between agent-protocol and openakita?
- agent-protocol: Common interface for AI agents. openakita: An open-source AI assistant framework with skills and agent architecture. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.
- When should I choose agent-protocol over openakita?
- Choose agent-protocol over openakita when License: agent-protocol is MIT, openakita is AGPL-3.0; Tags unique to agent-protocol: agents, ai-agent, api, auto-gpt; When you want to ensure interoperability between different AI agents irrespective of the frameworks used by them.
- When should I choose openakita over agent-protocol?
- Choose openakita over agent-protocol when License: openakita is AGPL-3.0, agent-protocol is MIT; Tags unique to openakita: agent, ai, assistant, automation; openakita ships Docker support for self-hosted deployment; For developing agents that can be customized with specific modular skills suitable for diverse assistant tasks.
- When should I avoid agent-protocol?
- If you are developing an isolated system with no intention to communicate or integrate with other AI agents outside this scope. When working in environments where specific, proprietary interfaces provide significantly better performance or features than adhering to a generic protocol could offer.
- When should I avoid openakita?
- Avoid if proprietary or non-open source solutions are preferred as OpenAkita's AGPL-3.0 license mandates sharing modifications publicly Consider alternatives if a less modular approach is desired, since OpenAkita strongly emphasizes a skills-based agent architecture which may complicate straightforward integrations
- Is agent-protocol or openakita more popular on GitHub?
- openakita has more GitHub stars (1,955 vs 1,454). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.
- Are agent-protocol and openakita open source?
- Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (agent-protocol: MIT, openakita: AGPL-3.0).
- Where can I find alternatives to agent-protocol or openakita?
- GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at agent-protocol alternatives and openakita alternatives (agent-protocol markdown twin, openakita markdown twin), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.
- Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?
- Yes. The markdown twin at this comparison mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.
- Which is better maintained, agent-protocol or openakita?
- agent-protocol: Dormant. openakita: Very active. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.
- Where are the full trust reports for agent-protocol and openakita?
- GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: agent-protocol trust report; openakita trust report.