Comparison
AudioGPT vs SenseVoice
Verdict
Pick AudioGPT if audioGPT is a Python-based tool for generating and understanding various audio forms including speech, music, sound effects, and talking head animations using pre-trained models; pick SenseVoice if senseVoice is ideal for applications needing fast multilingual ASR with emotion recognition and audio event detection in over 50 languages.
Markdown twin · AudioGPT alternatives · SenseVoice alternatives
GraphCanon updated 1w
vs
Trust & integrity
| Signal | AudioGPT | SenseVoice |
|---|---|---|
| Maintenance | Dormant (769d since push) As of 1w · github_public_v1 | Very active (2d since push) As of 3w · github_public_v1 |
| Provenance | Not a fork · Organization account As of 1w · github_public_v1 | Not a fork · Organization account As of 3w · github_public_v1 |
| OSV dependency advisories | Published findings As of 1mo · osv@v1 | No published findings from this source as of 2026-07-11 As of 1mo · osv@v1 |
| deps.dev advisories | Not queried deps.dev@v1 | Published findings As of 4w · deps.dev@v1 |
| OpenSSF Scorecard | Not queried openssf-scorecard@v1 | No public record from this source As of 4w · openssf-scorecard@v1 |
Tagline
- AudioGPT
- AudioGPT: Understanding and Generating Speech, Music, Sound, and Talking Head
- SenseVoice
- Multilingual speech understanding toolkit with ASR, emotion recognition, and audio event detection.
Stars
- AudioGPT
- 10k
- SenseVoice
- 9.0k
Forks
- AudioGPT
- 850
- SenseVoice
- 799
Open issues
- AudioGPT
- 53
- SenseVoice
- 0
Language
- AudioGPT
- Python
- SenseVoice
- C
Adopt for
- AudioGPT
- AudioGPT is a Python-based tool for generating and understanding various audio forms including speech, music, sound effects, and talking head animations using pre-trained models.
- SenseVoice
- SenseVoice is ideal for applications needing fast multilingual ASR with emotion recognition and audio event detection in over 50 languages.
Persona
- AudioGPT
- -
- SenseVoice
- -
Runtime
- AudioGPT
- -
- SenseVoice
- -
License
- AudioGPT
- Other
- SenseVoice
- Other
Last pushed
- AudioGPT
- Jul 6, 2024
- SenseVoice
- Jul 27, 2026
Categories
- AudioGPT
- Speech & Audio
- SenseVoice
- Speech & Audio
Trust and health
Maintenance
- AudioGPT
- Dormant (18%)
- SenseVoice
- Very active (96%)
Days since push
- AudioGPT
- 769d
- SenseVoice
- 2d
Open issues (now)
- AudioGPT
- 53
- SenseVoice
- 0
Stars delta
- AudioGPT
- +3 (30d)
- SenseVoice
- Unknown
Open issues delta
- AudioGPT
- -1 (30d)
- SenseVoice
- Unknown
OSV dependency advisories
- AudioGPT
- Published findings
- SenseVoice
- No published findings from this source as of 2026-07-11
deps.dev advisories
- AudioGPT
- Not queried
- SenseVoice
- Published findings
OpenSSF Scorecard
- AudioGPT
- Not queried
- SenseVoice
- No public record from this source
Full report
- AudioGPT
- Trust report
- SenseVoice
- Trust report
Choose AudioGPT if…
- AudioGPT is primarily Python; SenseVoice is C.
- Tags unique to AudioGPT: audio, gpt, music, sound.
- - Utilize AudioGPT when you need to generate speech or music with specific style transfer capabilities using GenerSpeech.
When NOT to use AudioGPT
- - Avoid AudioGPT if your audio processing toolkit needs to be exclusively self-contained; some model references are external links requiring separate access.
- - Do not use for projects that absolutely need completed features for all tasks as certain capabilities (speech translation) are still work-in-progress.
Choose SenseVoice if…
- SenseVoice is primarily C; AudioGPT is Python.
- Tags unique to SenseVoice: asr, audio-analysis, audio-event-detection, cantonese.
- SenseVoice ships Docker support for self-hosted deployment.
- Projects requiring speed, with non-autoregressive models being up to 15 times faster than Whisper
When NOT to use SenseVoice
- Applications needing Python-based implementation since SenseVoice relies on C and PyTorch for its framework
- Scenarios demanding the lowest level of inference latency as it may have higher overhead compared to simpler models
Explore
Sources
Every stat on this page traces to a dated GitHub sync, license file, enrichment field, or trust scan.
- GitHub stars (AIGC-Audio/AudioGPT) · observed Aug 15, 2026
- GitHub forks (AIGC-Audio/AudioGPT) · observed Aug 15, 2026
- Last push (AIGC-Audio/AudioGPT) · observed Jul 6, 2024
- License file (Other) · observed Aug 15, 2026
- Decision facts (enrichment) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- Trust scan (lockfile / OSV) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- GitHub stars (FunAudioLLM/SenseVoice) · observed Jul 30, 2026
- GitHub forks (FunAudioLLM/SenseVoice) · observed Jul 30, 2026
- Last push (FunAudioLLM/SenseVoice) · observed Jul 27, 2026
- License file (Other) · observed Jul 30, 2026
- Decision facts (enrichment) · observed Jul 17, 2026
- Trust scan (lockfile / OSV) · observed Jul 11, 2026
GitHub stars on cards: AudioGPT 10k · SenseVoice 9.0k (synced Aug 15, 2026).
Common questions
- What is the difference between AudioGPT and SenseVoice?
- AudioGPT: AudioGPT: Understanding and Generating Speech, Music, Sound, and Talking Head. SenseVoice: Multilingual speech understanding toolkit with ASR, emotion recognition, and audio event detection.. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.
- When should I choose AudioGPT over SenseVoice?
- Choose AudioGPT over SenseVoice when AudioGPT is primarily Python; SenseVoice is C; Tags unique to AudioGPT: audio, gpt, music, sound; - Utilize AudioGPT when you need to generate speech or music with specific style transfer capabilities using GenerSpeech.
- When should I choose SenseVoice over AudioGPT?
- Choose SenseVoice over AudioGPT when SenseVoice is primarily C; AudioGPT is Python; Tags unique to SenseVoice: asr, audio-analysis, audio-event-detection, cantonese; SenseVoice ships Docker support for self-hosted deployment; Projects requiring speed, with non-autoregressive models being up to 15 times faster than Whisper.
- When should I avoid AudioGPT?
- - Avoid AudioGPT if your audio processing toolkit needs to be exclusively self-contained; some model references are external links requiring separate access. - Do not use for projects that absolutely need completed features for all tasks as certain capabilities (speech translation) are still work-in-progress.
- When should I avoid SenseVoice?
- Applications needing Python-based implementation since SenseVoice relies on C and PyTorch for its framework Scenarios demanding the lowest level of inference latency as it may have higher overhead compared to simpler models
- Is AudioGPT or SenseVoice more popular on GitHub?
- AudioGPT has more GitHub stars (10,172 vs 8,961). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.
- Are AudioGPT and SenseVoice open source?
- Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (AudioGPT: Other, SenseVoice: Other).
- Where can I find alternatives to AudioGPT or SenseVoice?
- GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at AudioGPT alternatives and SenseVoice alternatives (AudioGPT markdown twin, SenseVoice markdown twin), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.
- Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?
- Yes. The markdown twin at this comparison mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.
- Which is better maintained, AudioGPT or SenseVoice?
- AudioGPT: Dormant. SenseVoice: Very active. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.
- Where are the full trust reports for AudioGPT and SenseVoice?
- GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: AudioGPT trust report; SenseVoice trust report.