Home/Compare/openevolve vs langflow

Comparison

openevolve vs langflow

Verdict

Pick openevolve when license: openevolve is Apache-2.0, langflow is MIT; pick langflow when license: langflow is MIT, openevolve is Apache-2.0.

Markdown twin · openevolve alternatives · langflow alternatives

GraphCanon updated today

openevolve logo

openevolve

algorithmicsuperintelligence/openevolve

6.7kpushed Jul 5, 2026
vs
langflow logo

langflow

langflow-ai/langflow

152kpushed Jul 11, 2026

Trust & integrity

Signalopenevolvelangflow
Maintenance
Very active (6d since push)
As of today · github_public_v1
Very active (0d since push)
As of today · github_public_v1
Provenance
Not a fork · Organization account
As of today · github_public_v1
Not a fork · Organization account
As of today · github_public_v1
Security (OSV)
No lockfile
As of today · none
No criticals
As of today · osv@v1

Tagline

openevolve
Open-source implementation of AlphaEvolve
langflow
Langflow is a powerful tool for building and deploying AI-powered agents and workflows.

Stars

openevolve
6.7k
langflow
152k

Forks

openevolve
1.1k
langflow
9.7k

Open issues

openevolve
116
langflow
975

Language

openevolve
Python
langflow
Python

Adopt for

openevolve
-
langflow
Langflow specializes in creating and deploying AI agents and complex workflows through a versatile GUI-based approach.

Persona

openevolve
-
langflow
-

Runtime

openevolve
-
langflow
-

License

openevolve
Apache-2.0
langflow
MIT

Last pushed

openevolve
Jul 5, 2026
langflow
Jul 11, 2026

Categories

openevolve
AI Agents, LLM Frameworks, Inference & Serving
langflow
AI Agents, Inference & Serving

Trust and health

Days since push

openevolve
6d
langflow
0d

Open issues (now)

openevolve
116
langflow
975

Security scan

openevolve
No lockfile
langflow
No criticals

Full report

openevolve
Trust report
langflow
Trust report

Choose openevolve if…

  • License: openevolve is Apache-2.0, langflow is MIT.
  • Tags unique to openevolve: alphaevolve, deepmind-lab, deepmind, discovery.
  • Also covers LLM Frameworks.

When NOT to use openevolve

  • AI Agents: Don't use an agent loop when a deterministic workflow would do; agents add latency, cost, and non-determinism.
  • LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves.
  • Inference & Serving: Self-hosting rarely beats a hosted API on cost until you have steady, high-volume traffic.

Choose langflow if…

  • License: langflow is MIT, openevolve is Apache-2.0.
  • Tags unique to langflow: multiagent, agents, python, large-language-models.
  • - When you need an intuitive graphical interface to manage the creation of AI agents and workflows without deep coding knowledge.

When NOT to use langflow

  • - For developers preferring a code-first approach who find GUI interfaces restrictive for customization and workflow.
  • - When the project does not align with or leverage the specific topics of focus such as ChatGPT, multi-agent systems, or requires integration with platforms that Langflow's graphical interface cannot旖

Explore

Sources

Every stat on this page traces to a dated GitHub sync, license file, enrichment field, or trust scan.

GitHub stars on cards: openevolve 6.7k · langflow 152k (synced Jul 11, 2026).

Common questions

What is the difference between openevolve and langflow?
openevolve: Open-source implementation of AlphaEvolve. langflow: Langflow is a powerful tool for building and deploying AI-powered agents and workflows.. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.
When should I choose openevolve over langflow?
Choose openevolve over langflow when License: openevolve is Apache-2.0, langflow is MIT; Tags unique to openevolve: alphaevolve, deepmind-lab, deepmind, discovery; Also covers LLM Frameworks.
When should I choose langflow over openevolve?
Choose langflow over openevolve when License: langflow is MIT, openevolve is Apache-2.0; Tags unique to langflow: multiagent, agents, python, large-language-models; - When you need an intuitive graphical interface to manage the creation of AI agents and workflows without deep coding knowledge.
When should I avoid openevolve?
AI Agents: Don't use an agent loop when a deterministic workflow would do; agents add latency, cost, and non-determinism. LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves. Inference & Serving: Self-hosting rarely beats a hosted API on cost until you have steady, high-volume traffic.
When should I avoid langflow?
- For developers preferring a code-first approach who find GUI interfaces restrictive for customization and workflow. - When the project does not align with or leverage the specific topics of focus such as ChatGPT, multi-agent systems, or requires integration with platforms that Langflow's graphical interface cannot旖
Is openevolve or langflow more popular on GitHub?
langflow has more GitHub stars (151,697 vs 6,677). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.
Are openevolve and langflow open source?
Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (openevolve: Apache-2.0, langflow: MIT).
Where can I find alternatives to openevolve or langflow?
GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at openevolve alternatives and langflow alternatives (openevolve markdown twin, langflow markdown twin), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.
Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?
Yes. The markdown twin at this comparison mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.
Which is better maintained, openevolve or langflow?
openevolve: Very active. langflow: Very active. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.
Where are the full trust reports for openevolve and langflow?
GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: openevolve trust report; langflow trust report.