Home/Compare/gpt-researcher vs storm

Comparison

gpt-researcher vs storm

gpt-researcher (An autonomous agent that conducts deep research on any data using any LLM providers) vs storm (An LLM-powered knowledge curation system that researches a topic and generates full-length reports with citations.) - live GitHub stats and typed graph relationships, not marketing.

Markdown twin · gpt-researcher alternatives · storm alternatives

GraphCanon updated today

gpt-researcher

assafelovic/gpt-researcher

28kpushed Jul 5, 2026
vs

storm

stanford-oval/storm

30kpushed Sep 30, 2025

Tagline

gpt-researcher
An autonomous agent that conducts deep research on any data using any LLM providers
storm
An LLM-powered knowledge curation system that researches a topic and generates full-length reports with citations.

Stars

gpt-researcher
28k
storm
30k

Forks

gpt-researcher
3.8k
storm
2.8k

Open issues

gpt-researcher
210
storm
123

Language

gpt-researcher
Python
storm
Python

Adopt for

gpt-researcher
GPT Researcher is an open-source deep research agent that conducts thorough and unbiased web or local document analysis, producing comprehensive reports with inline images and detailed citations. It uses a 'planner' and
storm
STORM is an LLM-powered knowledge curation system that uses agentic-RAG for deep research to generate full-length reports with citations.

Persona

gpt-researcher
-
storm
-

Runtime

gpt-researcher
-
storm
-

License

gpt-researcher
Apache-2.0
storm
MIT

Last pushed

gpt-researcher
Jul 5, 2026
storm
Sep 30, 2025

Categories

gpt-researcher
AI Agents
storm
Data & Retrieval, LLM Frameworks

Trust and health

Maintenance

gpt-researcher
Very active (96%)
storm
Slowing (36%)

Days since push

gpt-researcher
2d
storm
281d

Open issues (now)

gpt-researcher
210
storm
123

Owner type

gpt-researcher
User
storm
Organization

Security scan

gpt-researcher
62 low (62 low)
storm
No criticals

Full report

gpt-researcher
Trust report

Typed relationship

gpt-researcher alternative stormBoth GPT Researcher and STORM aim to conduct large-scale research tasks, generate detailed reports with citations, using LLMs for deep inquiry into a topic.

Choose gpt-researcher if…

  • License: gpt-researcher is Apache-2.0, storm is MIT.
  • Requirements: Min 4 GB RAM; - A Python environment needs to be set up.; - Google Gemini (Nano Banana) integration for AI-generated images requires specific setup and keys..
  • Both GPT Researcher and STORM aim to conduct large-scale research tasks, generate detailed reports with citations, using LLMs for deep inquiry into a topic.
  • Tags unique to gpt-researcher: llms, deepresearch, ai, python.
  • Also covers AI Agents.
  • gpt-researcher ships Docker support for self-hosted deployment.
  • - You need to generate objective and detailed research reports beyond 2,000 words using both web sources and local documents.

When NOT to use gpt-researcher

  • - Your project requires real-time or interactive research with immediate feedback, as GPT Researcher focuses on in-depth analysis rather than quick responses.
  • - You are working within a restricted network environment where web scraping is not permitted, since the tool relies heavily on online sources for data gathering.

Choose storm if…

  • License: storm is MIT, gpt-researcher is Apache-2.0.
  • Both GPT Researcher and STORM aim to conduct large-scale research tasks, generate detailed reports with citations, using LLMs for deep inquiry into a topic.
  • Tags unique to storm: large-language-models, report-generation, retrieval-augmented-generation, knowledge-curation.
  • Also covers Data & Retrieval, LLM Frameworks.
  • When you need a tool capable of generating comprehensive and cited reports based on deep research.

When NOT to use storm

  • Avoid STORM if cost optimization is critical as it may involve using multiple different models to balance between quality and expense.
  • Do not choose STORM if you require a tool that does not modify its behavior through agentic-RAG processes, which are central to this system’s operation.

Explore

Related comparisons

Common questions

What is the difference between gpt-researcher and storm?
gpt-researcher: An autonomous agent that conducts deep research on any data using any LLM providers. storm: An LLM-powered knowledge curation system that researches a topic and generates full-length reports with citations.. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.
When should I choose gpt-researcher over storm?
Choose gpt-researcher over storm when License: gpt-researcher is Apache-2.0, storm is MIT; Requirements: Min 4 GB RAM; - A Python environment needs to be set up.; - Google Gemini (Nano Banana) integration for AI-generated images requires specific setup and keys.; Both GPT Researcher and STORM aim to conduct large-scale research tasks, generate detailed reports with citations, using LLMs for deep inquiry into a topic; Tags unique to gpt-researcher: llms, deepresearch, ai, python; Also covers AI Agents; gpt-researcher ships Docker support for self-hosted deployment; - You need to generate objective and detailed research reports beyond 2,000 words using both web sources and local documents.
When should I choose storm over gpt-researcher?
Choose storm over gpt-researcher when License: storm is MIT, gpt-researcher is Apache-2.0; Both GPT Researcher and STORM aim to conduct large-scale research tasks, generate detailed reports with citations, using LLMs for deep inquiry into a topic; Tags unique to storm: large-language-models, report-generation, retrieval-augmented-generation, knowledge-curation; Also covers Data & Retrieval, LLM Frameworks; When you need a tool capable of generating comprehensive and cited reports based on deep research.
When should I avoid gpt-researcher?
- Your project requires real-time or interactive research with immediate feedback, as GPT Researcher focuses on in-depth analysis rather than quick responses. - You are working within a restricted network environment where web scraping is not permitted, since the tool relies heavily on online sources for data gathering.
When should I avoid storm?
Avoid STORM if cost optimization is critical as it may involve using multiple different models to balance between quality and expense. Do not choose STORM if you require a tool that does not modify its behavior through agentic-RAG processes, which are central to this system’s operation.
Is gpt-researcher or storm more popular on GitHub?
storm has more GitHub stars (29,951 vs 28,146). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.
Are gpt-researcher and storm open source?
Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (gpt-researcher: Apache-2.0, storm: MIT).
Where can I find alternatives to gpt-researcher or storm?
GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at /tools/assafelovic-gpt-researcher/alternatives and /tools/stanford-oval-storm/alternatives (/tools/assafelovic-gpt-researcher/alternatives.md, /tools/stanford-oval-storm/alternatives.md), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.
Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?
Yes. The markdown twin at /compare/assafelovic-gpt-researcher-vs-stanford-oval-storm.md mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.
Which is better maintained, gpt-researcher or storm?
gpt-researcher: Very active. storm: Slowing. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.
Where are the full trust reports for gpt-researcher and storm?
GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: gpt-researcher: /tools/assafelovic-gpt-researcher/trust; storm: /tools/stanford-oval-storm/trust.

Command menu

Search tools or jump to a page