Home/Compare/Auto-PyTorch vs HpBandSter

Comparison

Auto-PyTorch vs HpBandSter

Verdict

Pick Auto-PyTorch if auto-PyTorch specializes in automatic architecture search and hyperparameter optimization for deep-learning models using PyTorch; pick HpBandSter if hpBandSter is noted for its robust approach to hyperparameter optimization and neural architecture search through distributed computing capabilities.

Markdown twin · Auto-PyTorch alternatives · HpBandSter alternatives

GraphCanon updated 2w

Auto-PyTorch logo

Auto-PyTorch

automl/Auto-PyTorch

2.5kpushed Apr 9, 2024
vs
HpBandSter logo

HpBandSter

automl/HpBandSter

632pushed Oct 16, 2022

Trust & integrity

SignalAuto-PyTorchHpBandSter
Maintenance
Dormant (846d since push)
As of 2w · github_public_v1
Dormant (1387d since push)
As of 2w · github_public_v1
Provenance
Not a fork · Organization account
As of 2w · github_public_v1
Not a fork · Organization account
As of 2w · github_public_v1
OSV dependency advisories
Published findings
As of 1mo · osv@v1
No lockfile (source not queried)
As of 1mo · osv@v1
deps.dev advisories
Not queried
deps.dev@v1
Not queried
deps.dev@v1
OpenSSF Scorecard
Not queried
openssf-scorecard@v1
Not queried
openssf-scorecard@v1

Tagline

Auto-PyTorch
Automatic architecture search and hyperparameter optimization for PyTorch
HpBandSter
a distributed Hyperband implementation on Steroids

Stars

Auto-PyTorch
2.5k
HpBandSter
632

Forks

Auto-PyTorch
303
HpBandSter
107

Open issues

Auto-PyTorch
75
HpBandSter
66

Language

Auto-PyTorch
Python
HpBandSter
Python

Adopt for

Auto-PyTorch
Auto-PyTorch specializes in automatic architecture search and hyperparameter optimization for deep-learning models using PyTorch.
HpBandSter
HpBandSter is noted for its robust approach to hyperparameter optimization and neural architecture search through distributed computing capabilities.

Persona

Auto-PyTorch
-
HpBandSter
-

Runtime

Auto-PyTorch
-
HpBandSter
-

License

Auto-PyTorch
Apache-2.0
HpBandSter
BSD-3-Clause License - Permits free use but requires preservation of copyright and license notices. Contributors retain the copyrights to their contributions.

Last pushed

Auto-PyTorch
Apr 9, 2024
HpBandSter
Oct 16, 2022

Categories

Auto-PyTorch
Data & Retrieval, Model Training
HpBandSter
Model Training

Trust and health

Days since push

Auto-PyTorch
846d
HpBandSter
1387d

Open issues (now)

Auto-PyTorch
75
HpBandSter
66

OSV dependency advisories

Auto-PyTorch
Published findings
HpBandSter
No lockfile (source not queried)

Full report

Auto-PyTorch
Trust report
HpBandSter
Trust report

Shared compatibility

  • Python · Auto-PyTorch: Python runtime · HpBandSter: Python runtime

Choose Auto-PyTorch if…

  • License: Auto-PyTorch is Apache-2.0, HpBandSter is BSD-3-Clause.
  • Tags unique to Auto-PyTorch: deep-learning, pytorch, tabular-data, time-series-forecasting.
  • Also covers Data & Retrieval.
  • Auto-PyTorch ships Docker support for self-hosted deployment.
  • Use when you need to automate both architectural searches and hyperparameter tuning specifically for PyTorch-based deep learning models.

When NOT to use Auto-PyTorch

  • Avoid using it if your AI development focuses on frameworks other than PyTorch.
  • Do not use when the requirements do not involve deep learning models or you are not interested in automating architecture search and hyperparameter tuning.

Choose HpBandSter if…

  • License: HpBandSter is BSD-3-Clause, Auto-PyTorch is Apache-2.0.
  • Pricing: HpBandSter is open-source software under a permissive BSD-3-Clause License, allowing unrestricted usage for personal or commercial purposes without any direct costs..
  • Requirements: Min 4 GB RAM; Requires Python environment. No Docker required..
  • Tags unique to HpBandSter: automated-machine-learning, bayesian-optimization, hyperparameter-optimization, neural-architecture-search.
  • HpBandSter is best used when conducting large-scale experiments on multiple machines that require efficient resource management across different environments.

When NOT to use HpBandSter

  • If your project involves smaller datasets or less complex models where individual hyperparameter tuning can be done manually, HpBandSter might be an overkill due to its advanced distributed settings.
  • Avoid using HpBandSter if you need a tool that heavily relies on Bayesian optimization techniques, as it specializes more in Hyperband methodology.

Explore

Sources

Every stat on this page traces to a dated GitHub sync, license file, enrichment field, or trust scan.

GitHub stars on cards: Auto-PyTorch 2.5k · HpBandSter 632 (synced Aug 4, 2026).

Common questions

What is the difference between Auto-PyTorch and HpBandSter?
Auto-PyTorch: Automatic architecture search and hyperparameter optimization for PyTorch. HpBandSter: a distributed Hyperband implementation on Steroids. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.
When should I choose Auto-PyTorch over HpBandSter?
Choose Auto-PyTorch over HpBandSter when License: Auto-PyTorch is Apache-2.0, HpBandSter is BSD-3-Clause; Tags unique to Auto-PyTorch: deep-learning, pytorch, tabular-data, time-series-forecasting; Also covers Data & Retrieval; Auto-PyTorch ships Docker support for self-hosted deployment; Use when you need to automate both architectural searches and hyperparameter tuning specifically for PyTorch-based deep learning models.
When should I choose HpBandSter over Auto-PyTorch?
Choose HpBandSter over Auto-PyTorch when License: HpBandSter is BSD-3-Clause, Auto-PyTorch is Apache-2.0; Pricing: HpBandSter is open-source software under a permissive BSD-3-Clause License, allowing unrestricted usage for personal or commercial purposes without any direct costs.; Requirements: Min 4 GB RAM; Requires Python environment. No Docker required.; Tags unique to HpBandSter: automated-machine-learning, bayesian-optimization, hyperparameter-optimization, neural-architecture-search; HpBandSter is best used when conducting large-scale experiments on multiple machines that require efficient resource management across different environments.
When should I avoid Auto-PyTorch?
Avoid using it if your AI development focuses on frameworks other than PyTorch. Do not use when the requirements do not involve deep learning models or you are not interested in automating architecture search and hyperparameter tuning.
When should I avoid HpBandSter?
If your project involves smaller datasets or less complex models where individual hyperparameter tuning can be done manually, HpBandSter might be an overkill due to its advanced distributed settings. Avoid using HpBandSter if you need a tool that heavily relies on Bayesian optimization techniques, as it specializes more in Hyperband methodology.
Is Auto-PyTorch or HpBandSter more popular on GitHub?
Auto-PyTorch has more GitHub stars (2,541 vs 632). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.
Are Auto-PyTorch and HpBandSter open source?
Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (Auto-PyTorch: Apache-2.0, HpBandSter: BSD-3-Clause).
Where can I find alternatives to Auto-PyTorch or HpBandSter?
GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at Auto-PyTorch alternatives and HpBandSter alternatives (Auto-PyTorch markdown twin, HpBandSter markdown twin), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.
Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?
Yes. The markdown twin at this comparison mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.
Which is better maintained, Auto-PyTorch or HpBandSter?
Auto-PyTorch: Dormant. HpBandSter: Dormant. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.
Where are the full trust reports for Auto-PyTorch and HpBandSter?
GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: Auto-PyTorch trust report; HpBandSter trust report.

Was this helpful?

Anonymous feedback helps us improve pages and translations.