Comparison
arxiv-mcp-server vs Agent-Reach
Verdict
Pick arxiv-mcp-server when license: arxiv-mcp-server is Apache-2.0, Agent-Reach is MIT; pick Agent-Reach when license: Agent-Reach is MIT, arxiv-mcp-server is Apache-2.0.
Markdown twin · arxiv-mcp-server alternatives · Agent-Reach alternatives
GraphCanon updated today
vs
Trust & integrity
| Signal | arxiv-mcp-server | Agent-Reach |
|---|---|---|
| Maintenance | Steady (53d since push) As of today · github_public_v1 | Very active (0d since push) As of today · github_public_v1 |
| Provenance | Not a fork · Personal account As of today · github_public_v1 | Not a fork · Personal account As of today · github_public_v1 |
| Security (OSV) | No lockfile As of today · none | No MCP manifest As of today · mcp_manifest |
Tagline
- arxiv-mcp-server
- A Model Context Protocol server for searching and analyzing arXiv papers
- Agent-Reach
- Give your AI agent eyes to see the entire internet. Read & search Twitter, Reddit, YouTube, GitHub, Bilibili, XiaoHongShu — one CLI, zero API fees.
Stars
- arxiv-mcp-server
- 3.0k
- Agent-Reach
- 55k
Forks
- arxiv-mcp-server
- 235
- Agent-Reach
- 4.5k
Open issues
- arxiv-mcp-server
- 16
- Agent-Reach
- 144
Language
- arxiv-mcp-server
- Python
- Agent-Reach
- Python
Adopt for
- arxiv-mcp-server
- -
- Agent-Reach
- -
Persona
- arxiv-mcp-server
- -
- Agent-Reach
- -
Runtime
- arxiv-mcp-server
- -
- Agent-Reach
- -
License
- arxiv-mcp-server
- Apache-2.0
- Agent-Reach
- MIT
Last pushed
- arxiv-mcp-server
- May 18, 2026
- Agent-Reach
- Jul 10, 2026
Categories
- arxiv-mcp-server
- LLM Frameworks, Developer Tools
- Agent-Reach
- LLM Frameworks, AI Agents, Developer Tools
Trust and health
Maintenance
- arxiv-mcp-server
- Steady (60%)
- Agent-Reach
- Very active (96%)
Days since push
- arxiv-mcp-server
- 53d
- Agent-Reach
- 0d
Open issues (now)
- arxiv-mcp-server
- 16
- Agent-Reach
- 144
Security scan
- arxiv-mcp-server
- No lockfile
- Agent-Reach
- No MCP manifest
Full report
- arxiv-mcp-server
- Trust report
- Agent-Reach
- Trust report
Choose arxiv-mcp-server if…
- License: arxiv-mcp-server is Apache-2.0, Agent-Reach is MIT.
- Tags unique to arxiv-mcp-server: claude-ai, mcp-server, llm, ai.
- Leaner open-issue backlog (16).
When NOT to use arxiv-mcp-server
- LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves.
- Developer Tools: A gateway is overkill when you're pinned to a single provider and model.
Choose Agent-Reach if…
- License: Agent-Reach is MIT, arxiv-mcp-server is Apache-2.0.
- Tags unique to Agent-Reach: agent-infrastructure, ai-search, bilibili, claude-code.
- Also covers AI Agents.
When NOT to use Agent-Reach
- LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves.
- AI Agents: Don't use an agent loop when a deterministic workflow would do; agents add latency, cost, and non-determinism.
- Developer Tools: A gateway is overkill when you're pinned to a single provider and model.
Explore
Sources
Every stat on this page traces to a dated GitHub sync, license file, enrichment field, or trust scan.
- GitHub stars (blazickjp/arxiv-mcp-server) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- GitHub forks (blazickjp/arxiv-mcp-server) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- Last push (blazickjp/arxiv-mcp-server) · observed May 18, 2026
- License file (Apache-2.0) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- Trust scan (lockfile / OSV) · observed Jul 12, 2026
- GitHub stars (Panniantong/Agent-Reach) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- GitHub forks (Panniantong/Agent-Reach) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- Last push (Panniantong/Agent-Reach) · observed Jul 10, 2026
- License file (MIT) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- Trust scan (lockfile / OSV) · observed Jul 11, 2026
GitHub stars on cards: arxiv-mcp-server 3.0k · Agent-Reach 55k (synced Jul 11, 2026).
Common questions
- What is the difference between arxiv-mcp-server and Agent-Reach?
- arxiv-mcp-server: A Model Context Protocol server for searching and analyzing arXiv papers. Agent-Reach: Give your AI agent eyes to see the entire internet. Read & search Twitter, Reddit, YouTube, GitHub, Bilibili, XiaoHongShu — one CLI, zero API fees.. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.
- When should I choose arxiv-mcp-server over Agent-Reach?
- Choose arxiv-mcp-server over Agent-Reach when License: arxiv-mcp-server is Apache-2.0, Agent-Reach is MIT; Tags unique to arxiv-mcp-server: claude-ai, mcp-server, llm, ai; Leaner open-issue backlog (16).
- When should I choose Agent-Reach over arxiv-mcp-server?
- Choose Agent-Reach over arxiv-mcp-server when License: Agent-Reach is MIT, arxiv-mcp-server is Apache-2.0; Tags unique to Agent-Reach: agent-infrastructure, ai-search, bilibili, claude-code; Also covers AI Agents.
- When should I avoid arxiv-mcp-server?
- LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves. Developer Tools: A gateway is overkill when you're pinned to a single provider and model.
- When should I avoid Agent-Reach?
- LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves. AI Agents: Don't use an agent loop when a deterministic workflow would do; agents add latency, cost, and non-determinism. Developer Tools: A gateway is overkill when you're pinned to a single provider and model.
- Is arxiv-mcp-server or Agent-Reach more popular on GitHub?
- Agent-Reach has more GitHub stars (54,715 vs 2,950). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.
- Are arxiv-mcp-server and Agent-Reach open source?
- Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (arxiv-mcp-server: Apache-2.0, Agent-Reach: MIT).
- Where can I find alternatives to arxiv-mcp-server or Agent-Reach?
- GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at arxiv-mcp-server alternatives and Agent-Reach alternatives (arxiv-mcp-server markdown twin, Agent-Reach markdown twin), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.
- Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?
- Yes. The markdown twin at this comparison mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.
- Which is better maintained, arxiv-mcp-server or Agent-Reach?
- arxiv-mcp-server: Steady. Agent-Reach: Very active. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.
- Where are the full trust reports for arxiv-mcp-server and Agent-Reach?
- GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: arxiv-mcp-server trust report; Agent-Reach trust report.