Comparison
browser-use vs workflow
Verdict
Pick browser-use when browser-use is primarily Python; workflow is JavaScript; pick workflow when workflow is primarily JavaScript; browser-use is Python.
Markdown twin · browser-use alternatives · workflow alternatives
GraphCanon updated today
vs
Trust & integrity
| Signal | browser-use | workflow |
|---|---|---|
| Maintenance | Very active (0d since push) As of 4d · github_public_v1 | Dormant (1692d since push) As of today · github_public_v1 |
| Provenance | Not a fork · Organization account As of 4d · github_public_v1 | Not a fork · Personal account As of today · github_public_v1 |
| OSV dependency advisories | No lockfile (source not queried) As of 4d · osv@v1 | No lockfile (source not queried) As of today · osv@v1 |
| deps.dev advisories | Not queried deps.dev@v1 | Not queried deps.dev@v1 |
| OpenSSF Scorecard | Not queried openssf-scorecard@v1 | Not queried openssf-scorecard@v1 |
Tagline
- browser-use
- Make websites accessible for AI agents. Automate tasks online with ease.
- workflow
- 一个工作流平台
Stars
- browser-use
- 104k
- workflow
- 2.0k
Forks
- browser-use
- 11k
- workflow
- 283
Open issues
- browser-use
- 296
- workflow
- 24
Language
- browser-use
- Python
- workflow
- JavaScript
Adopt for
- browser-use
- browser-use is a Python-based toolset that facilitates web task automation and enhances website interaction accessibility for AI agents using browser automation techniques.
- workflow
- -
Persona
- browser-use
- -
- workflow
- -
Runtime
- browser-use
- -
- workflow
- -
License
- browser-use
- The MIT License provides great flexibility and permissiveness for both open-source and proprietary software projects.
- workflow
- -
Last pushed
- browser-use
- Jul 11, 2026
- workflow
- Nov 26, 2021
Categories
- browser-use
- AI Agents, Developer Tools
- workflow
- Data & Retrieval, Developer Tools
Trust and health
Maintenance
- browser-use
- Very active (96%)
- workflow
- Dormant (18%)
Days since push
- browser-use
- 0d
- workflow
- 1692d
Open issues (now)
- browser-use
- 296
- workflow
- 24
Owner type
- browser-use
- Organization
- workflow
- User
Full report
- browser-use
- Trust report
- workflow
- Trust report
Choose browser-use if…
- browser-use is primarily Python; workflow is JavaScript.
- Pricing: This tool is provided under the MIT license which means you can use it freely but there are no guarantees or formal support unless included in separate agreements..
- Requirements: Min 2 GB RAM; Requires Docker; Playwright installation and configuration needed for full functionality..
- Tags unique to browser-use: ai-agents, ai-tools, browser-automation, llm.
- Also covers AI Agents.
- When you need to automate interactions with websites in a straightforward manner, especially if your use case already leverages Playwright under the hood.
When NOT to use browser-use
- Avoid using browser-use if your automation workflow requires features that are exclusive to a different framework or library, such as specific functionalities only available in Selenium, as browseruse
Choose workflow if…
- workflow is primarily JavaScript; browser-use is Python.
- Tags unique to workflow: chain, cli, fe-workflow, lerna.
- Also covers Data & Retrieval.
When NOT to use workflow
- Last GitHub push was 1692 days ago (dormant maintenance, Nov 26, 2021). Validate activity before betting a new project on workflow.
- Data & Retrieval: Skip a heavy ingestion framework when your corpus is small and static; a script plus the embedding API is enough.
- Developer Tools: A gateway is overkill when you're pinned to a single provider and model.
Explore
Sources
Every stat on this page traces to a dated GitHub sync, license file, enrichment field, or trust scan.
- GitHub stars (browser-use/browser-use) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- GitHub forks (browser-use/browser-use) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- Last push (browser-use/browser-use) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- License file (MIT) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- Decision facts (enrichment) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- Trust scan (lockfile / OSV) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- GitHub stars (luoxue-victor/workflow) · observed Jul 15, 2026
- GitHub forks (luoxue-victor/workflow) · observed Jul 15, 2026
- Last push (luoxue-victor/workflow) · observed Nov 26, 2021
- License file (unknown) · observed Jul 15, 2026
- Trust scan (lockfile / OSV) · observed Jul 15, 2026
GitHub stars on cards: browser-use 104k · workflow 2.0k (synced Jul 11, 2026).
Common questions
- What is the difference between browser-use and workflow?
- browser-use: Make websites accessible for AI agents. Automate tasks online with ease.. workflow: 一个工作流平台. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.
- When should I choose browser-use over workflow?
- Choose browser-use over workflow when browser-use is primarily Python; workflow is JavaScript; Pricing: This tool is provided under the MIT license which means you can use it freely but there are no guarantees or formal support unless included in separate agreements.; Requirements: Min 2 GB RAM; Requires Docker; Playwright installation and configuration needed for full functionality.; Tags unique to browser-use: ai-agents, ai-tools, browser-automation, llm; Also covers AI Agents; When you need to automate interactions with websites in a straightforward manner, especially if your use case already leverages Playwright under the hood.
- When should I choose workflow over browser-use?
- Choose workflow over browser-use when workflow is primarily JavaScript; browser-use is Python; Tags unique to workflow: chain, cli, fe-workflow, lerna; Also covers Data & Retrieval.
- When should I avoid browser-use?
- Avoid using browser-use if your automation workflow requires features that are exclusive to a different framework or library, such as specific functionalities only available in Selenium, as browseruse
- When should I avoid workflow?
- Last GitHub push was 1692 days ago (dormant maintenance, Nov 26, 2021). Validate activity before betting a new project on workflow. Data & Retrieval: Skip a heavy ingestion framework when your corpus is small and static; a script plus the embedding API is enough. Developer Tools: A gateway is overkill when you're pinned to a single provider and model.
- Is browser-use or workflow more popular on GitHub?
- browser-use has more GitHub stars (104,191 vs 1,972). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.
- Are browser-use and workflow open source?
- Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub.
- Where can I find alternatives to browser-use or workflow?
- GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at browser-use alternatives and workflow alternatives (browser-use markdown twin, workflow markdown twin), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.
- Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?
- Yes. The markdown twin at this comparison mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.
- Which is better maintained, browser-use or workflow?
- browser-use: Very active. workflow: Dormant. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.
- Where are the full trust reports for browser-use and workflow?
- GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: browser-use trust report; workflow trust report.