Comparison
browser-use vs autoMate
Verdict
Pick browser-use when pricing: This tool is provided under the MIT license which means you can use it freely but there are no guarantees or formal support unless included in separate agreements.; pick autoMate when tags unique to autoMate: agent, ai, computeruse, deepseek.
Markdown twin · browser-use alternatives · autoMate alternatives
GraphCanon updated today
vs
Trust & integrity
| Signal | browser-use | autoMate |
|---|---|---|
| Maintenance | Very active (0d since push) As of 4d · github_public_v1 | Steady (76d since push) As of today · github_public_v1 |
| Provenance | Not a fork · Organization account As of 4d · github_public_v1 | Not a fork · Personal account As of today · github_public_v1 |
| OSV dependency advisories | No lockfile (source not queried) As of 4d · osv@v1 | Published findings As of today · osv@v1 |
| deps.dev advisories | Not queried deps.dev@v1 | Not queried deps.dev@v1 |
| OpenSSF Scorecard | Not queried openssf-scorecard@v1 | Not queried openssf-scorecard@v1 |
Tagline
- browser-use
- Make websites accessible for AI agents. Automate tasks online with ease.
- autoMate
- Like Manus, Computer Use Agent(CUA) and Omniparser, we are computer-using agents.AI-driven local automation assistant that uses natural language to make computers work by themselves
Stars
- browser-use
- 104k
- autoMate
- 3.9k
Forks
- browser-use
- 11k
- autoMate
- 489
Open issues
- browser-use
- 296
- autoMate
- 6
Language
- browser-use
- Python
- autoMate
- Python
Adopt for
- browser-use
- browser-use is a Python-based toolset that facilitates web task automation and enhances website interaction accessibility for AI agents using browser automation techniques.
- autoMate
- -
Persona
- browser-use
- -
- autoMate
- -
Runtime
- browser-use
- -
- autoMate
- -
License
- browser-use
- The MIT License provides great flexibility and permissiveness for both open-source and proprietary software projects.
- autoMate
- MIT
Last pushed
- browser-use
- Jul 11, 2026
- autoMate
- Apr 30, 2026
Categories
- browser-use
- AI Agents, Developer Tools
- autoMate
- AI Agents, Developer Tools, Inference & Serving
Trust and health
Maintenance
- browser-use
- Very active (96%)
- autoMate
- Steady (60%)
Days since push
- browser-use
- 0d
- autoMate
- 76d
Open issues (now)
- browser-use
- 296
- autoMate
- 6
Owner type
- browser-use
- Organization
- autoMate
- User
OSV dependency advisories
- browser-use
- No lockfile (source not queried)
- autoMate
- Published findings
Full report
- browser-use
- Trust report
- autoMate
- Trust report
Choose browser-use if…
- Pricing: This tool is provided under the MIT license which means you can use it freely but there are no guarantees or formal support unless included in separate agreements..
- Requirements: Min 2 GB RAM; Requires Docker; Playwright installation and configuration needed for full functionality..
- Tags unique to browser-use: ai-agents, ai-tools, browser-automation, llm.
- When you need to automate interactions with websites in a straightforward manner, especially if your use case already leverages Playwright under the hood.
When NOT to use browser-use
- Avoid using browser-use if your automation workflow requires features that are exclusive to a different framework or library, such as specific functionalities only available in Selenium, as browseruse
Choose autoMate if…
- Tags unique to autoMate: agent, ai, computeruse, deepseek.
- Also covers Inference & Serving.
- autoMate ships Docker support for self-hosted deployment.
When NOT to use autoMate
- AI Agents: Don't use an agent loop when a deterministic workflow would do; agents add latency, cost, and non-determinism.
- Developer Tools: A gateway is overkill when you're pinned to a single provider and model.
- Inference & Serving: Self-hosting rarely beats a hosted API on cost until you have steady, high-volume traffic.
Explore
Sources
Every stat on this page traces to a dated GitHub sync, license file, enrichment field, or trust scan.
- GitHub stars (browser-use/browser-use) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- GitHub forks (browser-use/browser-use) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- Last push (browser-use/browser-use) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- License file (MIT) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- Decision facts (enrichment) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- Trust scan (lockfile / OSV) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- GitHub stars (yuruotong1/autoMate) · observed Jul 15, 2026
- GitHub forks (yuruotong1/autoMate) · observed Jul 15, 2026
- Last push (yuruotong1/autoMate) · observed Apr 30, 2026
- License file (MIT) · observed Jul 15, 2026
- Trust scan (lockfile / OSV) · observed Jul 15, 2026
GitHub stars on cards: browser-use 104k · autoMate 3.9k (synced Jul 11, 2026).
Common questions
- What is the difference between browser-use and autoMate?
- browser-use: Make websites accessible for AI agents. Automate tasks online with ease.. autoMate: Like Manus, Computer Use Agent(CUA) and Omniparser, we are computer-using agents.AI-driven local automation assistant that uses natural language to make computers work by themselves. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.
- When should I choose browser-use over autoMate?
- Choose browser-use over autoMate when Pricing: This tool is provided under the MIT license which means you can use it freely but there are no guarantees or formal support unless included in separate agreements.; Requirements: Min 2 GB RAM; Requires Docker; Playwright installation and configuration needed for full functionality.; Tags unique to browser-use: ai-agents, ai-tools, browser-automation, llm; When you need to automate interactions with websites in a straightforward manner, especially if your use case already leverages Playwright under the hood.
- When should I choose autoMate over browser-use?
- Choose autoMate over browser-use when Tags unique to autoMate: agent, ai, computeruse, deepseek; Also covers Inference & Serving; autoMate ships Docker support for self-hosted deployment.
- When should I avoid browser-use?
- Avoid using browser-use if your automation workflow requires features that are exclusive to a different framework or library, such as specific functionalities only available in Selenium, as browseruse
- When should I avoid autoMate?
- AI Agents: Don't use an agent loop when a deterministic workflow would do; agents add latency, cost, and non-determinism. Developer Tools: A gateway is overkill when you're pinned to a single provider and model. Inference & Serving: Self-hosting rarely beats a hosted API on cost until you have steady, high-volume traffic.
- Is browser-use or autoMate more popular on GitHub?
- browser-use has more GitHub stars (104,191 vs 3,931). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.
- Are browser-use and autoMate open source?
- Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (browser-use: MIT, autoMate: MIT).
- Where can I find alternatives to browser-use or autoMate?
- GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at browser-use alternatives and autoMate alternatives (browser-use markdown twin, autoMate markdown twin), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.
- Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?
- Yes. The markdown twin at this comparison mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.
- Which is better maintained, browser-use or autoMate?
- browser-use: Very active. autoMate: Steady. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.
- Where are the full trust reports for browser-use and autoMate?
- GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: browser-use trust report; autoMate trust report.