Home/Compare/mlx-serve vs ai-gateway

Comparison

mlx-serve vs ai-gateway

Verdict

Pick mlx-serve if focused on supporting Apple Silicon-powered macOS devices, mlx-serve provides a native and API-compatible inference service without requiring Python; pick ai-gateway if ai-gateway from Ferro Labs supports over 30 LLMs with integrated caching, guardrails, A/B testing, and cost controls, making it ideal for managing multiple language models in a production environment.

Markdown twin · mlx-serve alternatives · ai-gateway alternatives

GraphCanon updated Sep 20, 2026

15views this month

mlx-serve logo

mlx-serve

ddalcu/mlx-serve

1.4kpushed Sep 19, 2026
vs
ai-gateway logo

ai-gateway

ferro-labs/ai-gateway

256pushed Sep 10, 2026

Trust & integrity

Signalmlx-serveai-gateway
Maintenance
Very active (0d since push)
As of Sep 20, 2026 · github_public_v1
Very active (2d since push)
As of Sep 12, 2026 · github_public_v1
Provenance
Not a fork · Personal account
As of Sep 20, 2026 · github_public_v1
Not a fork · Organization account
As of Sep 12, 2026 · github_public_v1
OSV dependency advisories
No lockfile (source not queried)
As of Jul 15, 2026 · osv@v1
Published findings
As of Jul 15, 2026 · osv@v1
deps.dev advisories
Not queried
deps.dev@v1
Not queried
deps.dev@v1
OpenSSF Scorecard
Not queried
openssf-scorecard@v1
Not queried
openssf-scorecard@v1

Tagline

mlx-serve
Native LLM inference server for Apple Silicon
ai-gateway
Unified AI Gateway for multiple LLMs with caching, guardrails, A/B testing, and cost controls

Stars

mlx-serve
1.4k
ai-gateway
256

Forks

mlx-serve
130
ai-gateway
35

Open issues

mlx-serve
54
ai-gateway
68

Language

mlx-serve
Zig
ai-gateway
Go

Adopt for

mlx-serve
Focused on supporting Apple Silicon-powered macOS devices, mlx-serve provides a native and API-compatible inference service without requiring Python.
ai-gateway
ai-gateway from Ferro Labs supports over 30 LLMs with integrated caching, guardrails, A/B testing, and cost controls, making it ideal for managing multiple language models in a production environment.

Persona

mlx-serve
-
ai-gateway
-

Runtime

mlx-serve
-
ai-gateway
-

License

mlx-serve
MIT
ai-gateway
Apache-2.0 - a permissive free software license

Last pushed

mlx-serve
Sep 19, 2026
ai-gateway
Sep 10, 2026

Categories

mlx-serve
Inference & Serving
ai-gateway
Inference & Serving, Model Training

Trust and health

Days since push

mlx-serve
0d
ai-gateway
2d

Open issues (now)

mlx-serve
54
ai-gateway
68

Stars delta

mlx-serve
+1.1k (30d)
ai-gateway
+37 (30d)

Open issues delta

mlx-serve
+51 (30d)
ai-gateway
+5 (30d)

Owner type

mlx-serve
User
ai-gateway
Organization

OSV dependency advisories

mlx-serve
No lockfile (source not queried)
ai-gateway
Published findings

Full report

mlx-serve
Trust report
ai-gateway
Trust report

Choose mlx-serve if…

  • mlx-serve is primarily Zig; ai-gateway is Go.
  • License: mlx-serve is MIT, ai-gateway is Apache-2.0.
  • Requirements: Requires Apple Silicon-powered macOS devices to ensure optimal performance and compatibility..
  • Tags unique to mlx-serve: agent, anthropic-api, apple-silicon, deepseek-v4.
  • Use when your project requires running large language model (LLM) inferencing natively on Apple Silicon hardware.

When NOT to use mlx-serve

  • Avoid if your infrastructure does not include devices with Apple Silicon chips, as it is specifically optimized for this architecture.
  • Do not use if you require cross-platform compatibility as mlx-serve targets macOS exclusively.
  • This tool might not be suitable if Python integration is crucial in your project.

Choose ai-gateway if…

  • ai-gateway is primarily Go; mlx-serve is Zig.
  • License: ai-gateway is Apache-2.0, mlx-serve is MIT.
  • Tags unique to ai-gateway: ai-gateway, litellm, llm-cost, llm-proxy.
  • Also covers Model Training.
  • When you need to integrate more than 30 different LLM services including OpenAI and Anthropic

When NOT to use ai-gateway

  • If your project only involves one or two LLMs which does not necessitate the gateway's broad compatibility features
  • For small-scale projects that do not require comprehensive cost analysis tools
  • When custom integration for specific guardrails is required, as ai-gateway offers generalized settings

Explore

Sources

Every stat on this page traces to a dated GitHub sync, license file, enrichment field, or trust scan.

GitHub stars on cards: mlx-serve 1.4k · ai-gateway 256 (synced Sep 20, 2026).

Common questions

What is the difference between mlx-serve and ai-gateway?
mlx-serve: Native LLM inference server for Apple Silicon. ai-gateway: Unified AI Gateway for multiple LLMs with caching, guardrails, A/B testing, and cost controls. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.
When should I choose mlx-serve over ai-gateway?
Choose mlx-serve over ai-gateway when mlx-serve is primarily Zig; ai-gateway is Go; License: mlx-serve is MIT, ai-gateway is Apache-2.0; Requirements: Requires Apple Silicon-powered macOS devices to ensure optimal performance and compatibility.; Tags unique to mlx-serve: agent, anthropic-api, apple-silicon, deepseek-v4; Use when your project requires running large language model (LLM) inferencing natively on Apple Silicon hardware.
When should I choose ai-gateway over mlx-serve?
Choose ai-gateway over mlx-serve when ai-gateway is primarily Go; mlx-serve is Zig; License: ai-gateway is Apache-2.0, mlx-serve is MIT; Tags unique to ai-gateway: ai-gateway, litellm, llm-cost, llm-proxy; Also covers Model Training; When you need to integrate more than 30 different LLM services including OpenAI and Anthropic.
When should I avoid mlx-serve?
Avoid if your infrastructure does not include devices with Apple Silicon chips, as it is specifically optimized for this architecture. Do not use if you require cross-platform compatibility as mlx-serve targets macOS exclusively. This tool might not be suitable if Python integration is crucial in your project.
When should I avoid ai-gateway?
If your project only involves one or two LLMs which does not necessitate the gateway's broad compatibility features For small-scale projects that do not require comprehensive cost analysis tools When custom integration for specific guardrails is required, as ai-gateway offers generalized settings
Is mlx-serve or ai-gateway more popular on GitHub?
mlx-serve has more GitHub stars (1,418 vs 256). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.
Are mlx-serve and ai-gateway open source?
Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (mlx-serve: MIT, ai-gateway: Apache-2.0).
Where can I find alternatives to mlx-serve or ai-gateway?
GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at mlx-serve alternatives and ai-gateway alternatives (mlx-serve markdown twin, ai-gateway markdown twin), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.
Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?
Yes. The markdown twin at this comparison mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.
Which is better maintained, mlx-serve or ai-gateway?
mlx-serve: Very active. ai-gateway: Very active. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.
Where are the full trust reports for mlx-serve and ai-gateway?
GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: mlx-serve trust report; ai-gateway trust report.

Was this helpful?

Anonymous feedback helps us improve pages and translations.