Home/Compare/DeepSeek-R1 vs mobilegym

Comparison

DeepSeek-R1 vs mobilegym

Verdict

Pick DeepSeek-R1 when license: DeepSeek-R1 is MIT, mobilegym is Apache-2.0; pick mobilegym when license: mobilegym is Apache-2.0, DeepSeek-R1 is MIT.

Markdown twin · DeepSeek-R1 alternatives · mobilegym alternatives

GraphCanon updated today

DeepSeek-R1 logo

DeepSeek-R1

deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-R1

92kpushed Jun 27, 2025
vs
mobilegym logo

mobilegym

Purewhiter/mobilegym

721pushed Jul 1, 2026

Trust & integrity

SignalDeepSeek-R1mobilegym
Maintenance
Dormant (379d since push)
As of 3d · github_public_v1
Active (14d since push)
As of today · github_public_v1
Provenance
Not a fork · Organization account
As of 3d · github_public_v1
Not a fork · Personal account
As of today · github_public_v1
OSV dependency advisories
No lockfile (source not queried)
As of 4d · osv@v1
No lockfile (source not queried)
As of today · osv@v1
deps.dev advisories
Not queried
deps.dev@v1
Not queried
deps.dev@v1
OpenSSF Scorecard
Not queried
openssf-scorecard@v1
Not queried
openssf-scorecard@v1

Tagline

DeepSeek-R1
Repository contains distilled LLM models derived from Qwen and LLaMA series for various commercial uses.
mobilegym
MobileGym: A Verifiable and Highly Parallel Simulation Platform for Mobile GUI Agent Research · 浏览器里运行的安卓模拟器 · Browser-hosted Android Simulator · Verifiable Evaluation · Scalable Online RL Training

Stars

DeepSeek-R1
92k
mobilegym
721

Forks

DeepSeek-R1
12k
mobilegym
116

Open issues

DeepSeek-R1
45
mobilegym
5

Language

DeepSeek-R1
-
mobilegym
Python

Adopt for

DeepSeek-R1
DeepSeek-R1 provides a set of distilled LLMs from Qwen and LLaMA series that support commercial use.
mobilegym
-

Persona

DeepSeek-R1
-
mobilegym
-

Runtime

DeepSeek-R1
-
mobilegym
-

License

DeepSeek-R1
MIT
mobilegym
Apache-2.0

Last pushed

DeepSeek-R1
Jun 27, 2025
mobilegym
Jul 1, 2026

Categories

DeepSeek-R1
LLM Frameworks, Model Training
mobilegym
AI Agents, LLM Frameworks, Model Training

Trust and health

Maintenance

DeepSeek-R1
Dormant (18%)
mobilegym
Active (82%)

Days since push

DeepSeek-R1
379d
mobilegym
14d

Open issues (now)

DeepSeek-R1
45
mobilegym
5

Owner type

DeepSeek-R1
Organization
mobilegym
User

Full report

DeepSeek-R1
Trust report
mobilegym
Trust report

Choose DeepSeek-R1 if…

  • License: DeepSeek-R1 is MIT, mobilegym is Apache-2.0.
  • Pricing: The repository allows for commercial use under the MIT License or respective original licenses with no explicit monetary costs outlined in the repository..
  • Requirements: Min 4 GB RAM; This is a rough estimate based on common model requirements. Specific models within DeepSeek-R1 may have different resource needs..
  • Tags unique to DeepSeek-R1: commercial use, derived models, distilled models, mit license.
  • When you need to work with pre-trained models derived specifically from the Qwen-2.5 and Llama3.x series, benefiting from their unique characteristics.

When NOT to use DeepSeek-R1

  • Avoid if you need foundational models rather than distilled versions, as DeepSeek-R1 specializes in providing smaller, more efficient models suitable for resource-constrained environments.
  • If your project is tightly regulated or requires models from a different lineage, as DeepSeek-R1 exclusively provides derivatives of Qwen and LLaMA series.

Choose mobilegym if…

  • License: mobilegym is Apache-2.0, DeepSeek-R1 is MIT.
  • Tags unique to mobilegym: agent, agents, ai, android.
  • Also covers AI Agents.

When NOT to use mobilegym

  • AI Agents: Don't use an agent loop when a deterministic workflow would do; agents add latency, cost, and non-determinism.
  • LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves.
  • Model Training: Try prompting and RAG first; fine-tuning is the answer to style/format, not missing knowledge.

Explore

Sources

Every stat on this page traces to a dated GitHub sync, license file, enrichment field, or trust scan.

GitHub stars on cards: DeepSeek-R1 92k · mobilegym 721 (synced Jul 12, 2026).

Common questions

What is the difference between DeepSeek-R1 and mobilegym?
DeepSeek-R1: Repository contains distilled LLM models derived from Qwen and LLaMA series for various commercial uses.. mobilegym: MobileGym: A Verifiable and Highly Parallel Simulation Platform for Mobile GUI Agent Research · 浏览器里运行的安卓模拟器 · Browser-hosted Android Simulator · Verifiable Evaluation · Scalable Online RL Training. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.
When should I choose DeepSeek-R1 over mobilegym?
Choose DeepSeek-R1 over mobilegym when License: DeepSeek-R1 is MIT, mobilegym is Apache-2.0; Pricing: The repository allows for commercial use under the MIT License or respective original licenses with no explicit monetary costs outlined in the repository.; Requirements: Min 4 GB RAM; This is a rough estimate based on common model requirements. Specific models within DeepSeek-R1 may have different resource needs.; Tags unique to DeepSeek-R1: commercial use, derived models, distilled models, mit license; When you need to work with pre-trained models derived specifically from the Qwen-2.5 and Llama3.x series, benefiting from their unique characteristics.
When should I choose mobilegym over DeepSeek-R1?
Choose mobilegym over DeepSeek-R1 when License: mobilegym is Apache-2.0, DeepSeek-R1 is MIT; Tags unique to mobilegym: agent, agents, ai, android; Also covers AI Agents.
When should I avoid DeepSeek-R1?
Avoid if you need foundational models rather than distilled versions, as DeepSeek-R1 specializes in providing smaller, more efficient models suitable for resource-constrained environments. If your project is tightly regulated or requires models from a different lineage, as DeepSeek-R1 exclusively provides derivatives of Qwen and LLaMA series.
When should I avoid mobilegym?
AI Agents: Don't use an agent loop when a deterministic workflow would do; agents add latency, cost, and non-determinism. LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves. Model Training: Try prompting and RAG first; fine-tuning is the answer to style/format, not missing knowledge.
Is DeepSeek-R1 or mobilegym more popular on GitHub?
DeepSeek-R1 has more GitHub stars (91,991 vs 721). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.
Are DeepSeek-R1 and mobilegym open source?
Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (DeepSeek-R1: MIT, mobilegym: Apache-2.0).
Where can I find alternatives to DeepSeek-R1 or mobilegym?
GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at DeepSeek-R1 alternatives and mobilegym alternatives (DeepSeek-R1 markdown twin, mobilegym markdown twin), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.
Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?
Yes. The markdown twin at this comparison mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.
Which is better maintained, DeepSeek-R1 or mobilegym?
DeepSeek-R1: Dormant. mobilegym: Active. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.
Where are the full trust reports for DeepSeek-R1 and mobilegym?
GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: DeepSeek-R1 trust report; mobilegym trust report.

Was this helpful?

Anonymous feedback helps us improve pages and translations.