GraphCanon
Home/Compare/uzi vs moby

Comparison

uzi vs moby

Verdict

Pick uzi when license: uzi is MIT, moby is Apache-2.0; pick moby when license: moby is Apache-2.0, uzi is MIT.

Markdown twin · uzi alternatives · moby alternatives

GraphCanon updated today

uzi logo

uzi

devflowinc/uzi

★ 578pushed Jun 4, 2025
vs
moby logo

moby

moby/moby

★ 72kpushed Jul 10, 2026

Trust & integrity

Signaluzimoby
Maintenance
Dormant (401d since push)
As of today · github_public_v1
Very active (1d since push)
As of today · github_public_v1
Provenance
Not a fork · Organization account
As of today · github_public_v1
Not a fork · Organization account
As of today · github_public_v1
Security (OSV)
No lockfile
As of today · none
No criticals
As of today · osv@v1
uzi trust reportmoby trust reportTrust methodology

Tagline

uzi
CLI for running large numbers of coding agents in parallel with git worktrees
moby
The Moby Project - a collaborative project for the container ecosystem to assemble container-based systems

Stars

uzi
578
moby
72k

Forks

uzi
26
moby
19k

Open issues

uzi
9
moby
3.8k

Language

uzi
Go
moby
Go

Adopt for

uzi
-
moby
-

Persona

uzi
-
moby
-

Runtime

uzi
-
moby
-

License

uzi
MIT
moby
Apache-2.0

Last pushed

uzi
Jun 4, 2025
moby
Jul 10, 2026

Categories

uzi
LLM Frameworks, AI Agents, Inference & Serving
moby
LLM Frameworks, Developer Tools, Inference & Serving

Trust and health

Maintenance

uzi
Dormant (18%)
moby
Very active (96%)

Days since push

uzi
401d
moby
1d

Open issues (now)

uzi
9
moby
3.8k

Security scan

uzi
No lockfile
moby
No criticals

Full report

uzi
Trust report
moby
Trust report

Choose uzi if…

  • License: uzi is MIT, moby is Apache-2.0.
  • Tags unique to uzi: llm, ai, parallelization, codegen.
  • Also covers AI Agents.

When NOT to use uzi

  • Last GitHub push was 402 days ago (dormant maintenance, Jun 4, 2025). Validate activity before betting a new project on uzi.
  • LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves.
  • AI Agents: Don't use an agent loop when a deterministic workflow would do; agents add latency, cost, and non-determinism.
  • Inference & Serving: Self-hosting rarely beats a hosted API on cost until you have steady, high-volume traffic.
GitHubDetails

Choose moby if…

  • License: moby is Apache-2.0, uzi is MIT.
  • Tags unique to moby: docker, containers.
  • Also covers Developer Tools.
  • moby ships Docker support for self-hosted deployment.

When NOT to use moby

  • LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves.
  • Developer Tools: A gateway is overkill when you're pinned to a single provider and model.
  • Inference & Serving: Self-hosting rarely beats a hosted API on cost until you have steady, high-volume traffic.
GitHubDetails

Explore

uzi trust report →moby trust report →LLM Frameworks category →AI Agents category →Inference & Serving category →Developer Tools category →All comparisonsStack workflowsTrending tools

Sources

Every stat on this page traces to a dated GitHub sync, license file, enrichment field, or trust scan.

GitHub stars on cards: uzi 578 · moby 72k (synced Jul 11, 2026).

Common questions

What is the difference between uzi and moby?
uzi: CLI for running large numbers of coding agents in parallel with git worktrees. moby: The Moby Project - a collaborative project for the container ecosystem to assemble container-based systems. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.
When should I choose uzi over moby?
Choose uzi over moby when License: uzi is MIT, moby is Apache-2.0; Tags unique to uzi: llm, ai, parallelization, codegen; Also covers AI Agents.
When should I choose moby over uzi?
Choose moby over uzi when License: moby is Apache-2.0, uzi is MIT; Tags unique to moby: docker, containers; Also covers Developer Tools; moby ships Docker support for self-hosted deployment.
When should I avoid uzi?
Last GitHub push was 402 days ago (dormant maintenance, Jun 4, 2025). Validate activity before betting a new project on uzi. LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves. AI Agents: Don't use an agent loop when a deterministic workflow would do; agents add latency, cost, and non-determinism. Inference & Serving: Self-hosting rarely beats a hosted API on cost until you have steady, high-volume traffic.
When should I avoid moby?
LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves. Developer Tools: A gateway is overkill when you're pinned to a single provider and model. Inference & Serving: Self-hosting rarely beats a hosted API on cost until you have steady, high-volume traffic.
Is uzi or moby more popular on GitHub?
moby has more GitHub stars (71,899 vs 578). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.
Are uzi and moby open source?
Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (uzi: MIT, moby: Apache-2.0).
Where can I find alternatives to uzi or moby?
GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at uzi alternatives and moby alternatives (uzi markdown twin, moby markdown twin), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.
Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?
Yes. The markdown twin at this comparison mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.
Which is better maintained, uzi or moby?
uzi: Dormant. moby: Very active. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.
Where are the full trust reports for uzi and moby?
GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: uzi trust report; moby trust report.