Home/Compare/Chatterbox-TTS-Server vs OpenVoice

Comparison

Chatterbox-TTS-Server vs OpenVoice

Verdict

Pick Chatterbox-TTS-Server if chatterbox-TTS-Server: Self-hostable TTS solution with Web UI, APIs, voice cloning, and large-scale text support across CUDA, ROCm, CPU; pick OpenVoice if openVoice is an instant voice cloning tool utilizing an audio foundation model for text-to-speech and zero-shot capabilities.

Markdown twin · Chatterbox-TTS-Server alternatives · OpenVoice alternatives

GraphCanon updated 3w

Chatterbox-TTS-Server logo

Chatterbox-TTS-Server

devnen/Chatterbox-TTS-Server

1.4kpushed May 26, 2026
vs
OpenVoice logo

OpenVoice

myshell-ai/OpenVoice

37kpushed Apr 19, 2025

Trust & integrity

SignalChatterbox-TTS-ServerOpenVoice
Maintenance
Steady (64d since push)
As of 3w · github_public_v1
Dormant (465d since push)
As of 4w · github_public_v1
Provenance
Not a fork · Personal account
As of 3w · github_public_v1
Not a fork · Organization account
As of 4w · github_public_v1
OSV dependency advisories
Published findings
As of 1mo · osv@v1
Published findings
As of 1mo · osv@v1
deps.dev advisories
Not queried
deps.dev@v1
Not queried
deps.dev@v1
OpenSSF Scorecard
Not queried
openssf-scorecard@v1
Not queried
openssf-scorecard@v1

Tagline

Chatterbox-TTS-Server
Self-host the Chatterbox TTS model with a user-friendly Web UI and flexible API endpoints
OpenVoice
Instant voice cloning using an audio foundation model

Stars

Chatterbox-TTS-Server
1.4k
OpenVoice
37k

Forks

Chatterbox-TTS-Server
333
OpenVoice
4.1k

Open issues

Chatterbox-TTS-Server
45
OpenVoice
307

Language

Chatterbox-TTS-Server
Python
OpenVoice
Python

Adopt for

Chatterbox-TTS-Server
Chatterbox-TTS-Server: Self-hostable TTS solution with Web UI, APIs, voice cloning, and large-scale text support across CUDA, ROCm, CPU.
OpenVoice
OpenVoice is an instant voice cloning tool utilizing an audio foundation model for text-to-speech and zero-shot capabilities.

Persona

Chatterbox-TTS-Server
-
OpenVoice
-

Runtime

Chatterbox-TTS-Server
-
OpenVoice
-

License

Chatterbox-TTS-Server
MIT License, open-source with permissive terms for modification and distribution.
OpenVoice
Available under the MIT License, allowing free use for both commercial and research purposes.

Last pushed

Chatterbox-TTS-Server
May 26, 2026
OpenVoice
Apr 19, 2025

Categories

Chatterbox-TTS-Server
Speech & Audio
OpenVoice
Speech & Audio

Trust and health

Maintenance

Chatterbox-TTS-Server
Steady (60%)
OpenVoice
Dormant (18%)

Days since push

Chatterbox-TTS-Server
64d
OpenVoice
465d

Open issues (now)

Chatterbox-TTS-Server
45
OpenVoice
307

Owner type

Chatterbox-TTS-Server
User
OpenVoice
Organization

Full report

Chatterbox-TTS-Server
Trust report
OpenVoice
Trust report

Choose Chatterbox-TTS-Server if…

  • Requirements: Python 3.10 needed for pre-built wheels; avoid Python >=3.11 due to lack of support.; Ensure hardware and driver meets the Hardware Compatibility Matrix requirements..
  • Tags unique to Chatterbox-TTS-Server: ai, api-server, audio-generation, chatterbox.
  • Chatterbox-TTS-Server ships Docker support for self-hosted deployment.
  • You need a self-hosted Text-to-Speech service that supports advanced features like voice cloning.

When NOT to use Chatterbox-TTS-Server

  • When only pre-built wheels and no flexibility with Python versions is required (strictly follows Python 3.10).
  • If your hardware or OS lacks support detailed in the compatibility matrix, like unsupported GPUs/CPU setups.
  • For projects requiring minimal dependencies without manual handling of installation intricacies.

Choose OpenVoice if…

  • Pricing: As it is open-source with a permissive MIT license, usage is free. However, users may need to incur costs for compute resources when deploying scalable solutions..
  • Tags unique to OpenVoice: text-to-speech, tts, voice-clone, zero-shot-tts.
  • When rapid deployment of clone voices is needed without extensive training examples required by other tools due to its zero-shot text-to-speech feature.

When NOT to use OpenVoice

  • If your project requires fine-tuning of voice characteristics beyond what the tool's audio foundation model offers, as other tools may be more customizable.
  • When dealing with niche linguistic requirements or extremely rare language models that might not be well-supported by OpenVoice’s broader focus.

Explore

Sources

Every stat on this page traces to a dated GitHub sync, license file, enrichment field, or trust scan.

GitHub stars on cards: Chatterbox-TTS-Server 1.4k · OpenVoice 37k (synced Jul 30, 2026).

Common questions

What is the difference between Chatterbox-TTS-Server and OpenVoice?
Chatterbox-TTS-Server: Self-host the Chatterbox TTS model with a user-friendly Web UI and flexible API endpoints. OpenVoice: Instant voice cloning using an audio foundation model. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.
When should I choose Chatterbox-TTS-Server over OpenVoice?
Choose Chatterbox-TTS-Server over OpenVoice when Requirements: Python 3.10 needed for pre-built wheels; avoid Python >=3.11 due to lack of support.; Ensure hardware and driver meets the Hardware Compatibility Matrix requirements.; Tags unique to Chatterbox-TTS-Server: ai, api-server, audio-generation, chatterbox; Chatterbox-TTS-Server ships Docker support for self-hosted deployment; You need a self-hosted Text-to-Speech service that supports advanced features like voice cloning.
When should I choose OpenVoice over Chatterbox-TTS-Server?
Choose OpenVoice over Chatterbox-TTS-Server when Pricing: As it is open-source with a permissive MIT license, usage is free. However, users may need to incur costs for compute resources when deploying scalable solutions.; Tags unique to OpenVoice: text-to-speech, tts, voice-clone, zero-shot-tts; When rapid deployment of clone voices is needed without extensive training examples required by other tools due to its zero-shot text-to-speech feature.
When should I avoid Chatterbox-TTS-Server?
When only pre-built wheels and no flexibility with Python versions is required (strictly follows Python 3.10). If your hardware or OS lacks support detailed in the compatibility matrix, like unsupported GPUs/CPU setups. For projects requiring minimal dependencies without manual handling of installation intricacies.
When should I avoid OpenVoice?
If your project requires fine-tuning of voice characteristics beyond what the tool's audio foundation model offers, as other tools may be more customizable. When dealing with niche linguistic requirements or extremely rare language models that might not be well-supported by OpenVoice’s broader focus.
Is Chatterbox-TTS-Server or OpenVoice more popular on GitHub?
OpenVoice has more GitHub stars (37,044 vs 1,379). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.
Are Chatterbox-TTS-Server and OpenVoice open source?
Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (Chatterbox-TTS-Server: MIT, OpenVoice: MIT).
Where can I find alternatives to Chatterbox-TTS-Server or OpenVoice?
GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at Chatterbox-TTS-Server alternatives and OpenVoice alternatives (Chatterbox-TTS-Server markdown twin, OpenVoice markdown twin), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.
Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?
Yes. The markdown twin at this comparison mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.
Which is better maintained, Chatterbox-TTS-Server or OpenVoice?
Chatterbox-TTS-Server: Steady. OpenVoice: Dormant. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.
Where are the full trust reports for Chatterbox-TTS-Server and OpenVoice?
GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: Chatterbox-TTS-Server trust report; OpenVoice trust report.

Was this helpful?

Anonymous feedback helps us improve pages and translations.