Home/Compare/dust vs cc-switch

Comparison

dust vs cc-switch

Verdict

Pick dust when dust is primarily TypeScript; cc-switch is Rust; pick cc-switch when cc-switch is primarily Rust; dust is TypeScript.

Markdown twin · dust alternatives · cc-switch alternatives

GraphCanon updated today

dust logo

dust

dust-tt/dust

1.4kpushed Jul 11, 2026
vs
cc-switch logo

cc-switch

farion1231/cc-switch

116kpushed Jul 11, 2026

Trust & integrity

Signaldustcc-switch
Maintenance
Very active (0d since push)
As of today · github_public_v1
Very active (0d since push)
As of today · github_public_v1
Provenance
Not a fork · Organization account
As of today · github_public_v1
Not a fork · Personal account
As of today · github_public_v1
Security (OSV)
No lockfile
As of today · none
No MCP manifest
As of today · mcp_manifest

Tagline

dust
Custom AI agent platform to speed up your work.
cc-switch
A cross-platform desktop All-in-One assistant for Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, OpenClaw, Gemini CLI & Hermes Agent. Only official website: ccswitch.io

Stars

dust
1.4k
cc-switch
116k

Forks

dust
302
cc-switch
7.8k

Open issues

dust
224
cc-switch
1.9k

Language

dust
TypeScript
cc-switch
Rust

Adopt for

dust
-
cc-switch
-

Persona

dust
-
cc-switch
-

Runtime

dust
-
cc-switch
-

License

dust
MIT
cc-switch
MIT

Last pushed

dust
Jul 11, 2026
cc-switch
Jul 11, 2026

Categories

dust
AI Agents, LLM Frameworks, Developer Tools
cc-switch
AI Agents, Developer Tools

Trust and health

Open issues (now)

dust
224
cc-switch
1.9k

Owner type

dust
Organization
cc-switch
User

Security scan

dust
No lockfile
cc-switch
No MCP manifest

Full report

cc-switch
Trust report

Choose dust if…

  • dust is primarily TypeScript; cc-switch is Rust.
  • Tags unique to dust: agents, llm, large-language-models, rust.
  • Also covers LLM Frameworks.
  • dust ships Docker support for self-hosted deployment.

When NOT to use dust

  • AI Agents: Don't use an agent loop when a deterministic workflow would do; agents add latency, cost, and non-determinism.
  • LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves.
  • Developer Tools: A gateway is overkill when you're pinned to a single provider and model.

Choose cc-switch if…

  • cc-switch is primarily Rust; dust is TypeScript.
  • Tags unique to cc-switch: hermes-agent, hermes, codex, desktop-app.
  • More GitHub stars (116k vs 1.4k) - visibility, not fit.

When NOT to use cc-switch

  • AI Agents: Don't use an agent loop when a deterministic workflow would do; agents add latency, cost, and non-determinism.
  • Developer Tools: A gateway is overkill when you're pinned to a single provider and model.

Explore

Sources

Every stat on this page traces to a dated GitHub sync, license file, enrichment field, or trust scan.

GitHub stars on cards: dust 1.4k · cc-switch 116k (synced Jul 11, 2026).

Common questions

What is the difference between dust and cc-switch?
dust: Custom AI agent platform to speed up your work.. cc-switch: A cross-platform desktop All-in-One assistant for Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, OpenClaw, Gemini CLI & Hermes Agent. Only official website: ccswitch.io. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.
When should I choose dust over cc-switch?
Choose dust over cc-switch when dust is primarily TypeScript; cc-switch is Rust; Tags unique to dust: agents, llm, large-language-models, rust; Also covers LLM Frameworks; dust ships Docker support for self-hosted deployment.
When should I choose cc-switch over dust?
Choose cc-switch over dust when cc-switch is primarily Rust; dust is TypeScript; Tags unique to cc-switch: hermes-agent, hermes, codex, desktop-app; More GitHub stars (116k vs 1.4k) - visibility, not fit.
When should I avoid dust?
AI Agents: Don't use an agent loop when a deterministic workflow would do; agents add latency, cost, and non-determinism. LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves. Developer Tools: A gateway is overkill when you're pinned to a single provider and model.
When should I avoid cc-switch?
AI Agents: Don't use an agent loop when a deterministic workflow would do; agents add latency, cost, and non-determinism. Developer Tools: A gateway is overkill when you're pinned to a single provider and model.
Is dust or cc-switch more popular on GitHub?
cc-switch has more GitHub stars (115,863 vs 1,413). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.
Are dust and cc-switch open source?
Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (dust: MIT, cc-switch: MIT).
Where can I find alternatives to dust or cc-switch?
GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at dust alternatives and cc-switch alternatives (dust markdown twin, cc-switch markdown twin), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.
Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?
Yes. The markdown twin at this comparison mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.
Which is better maintained, dust or cc-switch?
dust: Very active. cc-switch: Very active. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.
Where are the full trust reports for dust and cc-switch?
GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: dust trust report; cc-switch trust report.