Home/Compare/cc-switch vs pi-mcp-adapter

Comparison

cc-switch vs pi-mcp-adapter

Verdict

Pick cc-switch when cc-switch is primarily Rust; pi-mcp-adapter is TypeScript; pick pi-mcp-adapter when pi-mcp-adapter is primarily TypeScript; cc-switch is Rust.

Markdown twin · cc-switch alternatives · pi-mcp-adapter alternatives

GraphCanon updated today

cc-switch logo

cc-switch

farion1231/cc-switch

116kpushed Jul 11, 2026
vs
pi-mcp-adapter logo

pi-mcp-adapter

nicobailon/pi-mcp-adapter

982pushed Jul 3, 2026

Trust & integrity

Signalcc-switchpi-mcp-adapter
Maintenance
Very active (0d since push)
As of today · github_public_v1
Active (7d since push)
As of today · github_public_v1
Provenance
Not a fork · Personal account
As of today · github_public_v1
Not a fork · Personal account
As of today · github_public_v1
Security (OSV)
No MCP manifest
As of today · mcp_manifest
No MCP manifest
As of today · mcp_manifest

Tagline

cc-switch
A cross-platform desktop All-in-One assistant for Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, OpenClaw, Gemini CLI & Hermes Agent. Only official website: ccswitch.io
pi-mcp-adapter
Token-efficient MCP adapter for Pi coding agent

Stars

cc-switch
116k
pi-mcp-adapter
982

Forks

cc-switch
7.8k
pi-mcp-adapter
189

Open issues

cc-switch
1.9k
pi-mcp-adapter
63

Language

cc-switch
Rust
pi-mcp-adapter
TypeScript

Adopt for

cc-switch
-
pi-mcp-adapter
-

Persona

cc-switch
-
pi-mcp-adapter
-

Runtime

cc-switch
-
pi-mcp-adapter
-

License

cc-switch
MIT
pi-mcp-adapter
MIT

Last pushed

cc-switch
Jul 11, 2026
pi-mcp-adapter
Jul 3, 2026

Categories

cc-switch
AI Agents, Developer Tools
pi-mcp-adapter
AI Agents, Developer Tools, LLM Frameworks

Trust and health

Maintenance

cc-switch
Very active (96%)
pi-mcp-adapter
Active (82%)

Days since push

cc-switch
0d
pi-mcp-adapter
7d

Open issues (now)

cc-switch
1.9k
pi-mcp-adapter
63

Full report

cc-switch
Trust report
pi-mcp-adapter
Trust report

Choose cc-switch if…

  • cc-switch is primarily Rust; pi-mcp-adapter is TypeScript.
  • Tags unique to cc-switch: ai-tools, claude-code, codex, desktop-app.
  • More GitHub stars (116k vs 982) - visibility, not fit.

When NOT to use cc-switch

  • AI Agents: Don't use an agent loop when a deterministic workflow would do; agents add latency, cost, and non-determinism.
  • Developer Tools: A gateway is overkill when you're pinned to a single provider and model.

Choose pi-mcp-adapter if…

  • pi-mcp-adapter is primarily TypeScript; cc-switch is Rust.
  • Tags unique to pi-mcp-adapter: ai, claude, coding-agent, extension.
  • Also covers LLM Frameworks.

When NOT to use pi-mcp-adapter

  • AI Agents: Don't use an agent loop when a deterministic workflow would do; agents add latency, cost, and non-determinism.
  • Developer Tools: A gateway is overkill when you're pinned to a single provider and model.
  • LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves.

Explore

Sources

Every stat on this page traces to a dated GitHub sync, license file, enrichment field, or trust scan.

GitHub stars on cards: cc-switch 116k · pi-mcp-adapter 982 (synced Jul 11, 2026).

Common questions

What is the difference between cc-switch and pi-mcp-adapter?
cc-switch: A cross-platform desktop All-in-One assistant for Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, OpenClaw, Gemini CLI & Hermes Agent. Only official website: ccswitch.io. pi-mcp-adapter: Token-efficient MCP adapter for Pi coding agent. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.
When should I choose cc-switch over pi-mcp-adapter?
Choose cc-switch over pi-mcp-adapter when cc-switch is primarily Rust; pi-mcp-adapter is TypeScript; Tags unique to cc-switch: ai-tools, claude-code, codex, desktop-app; More GitHub stars (116k vs 982) - visibility, not fit.
When should I choose pi-mcp-adapter over cc-switch?
Choose pi-mcp-adapter over cc-switch when pi-mcp-adapter is primarily TypeScript; cc-switch is Rust; Tags unique to pi-mcp-adapter: ai, claude, coding-agent, extension; Also covers LLM Frameworks.
When should I avoid cc-switch?
AI Agents: Don't use an agent loop when a deterministic workflow would do; agents add latency, cost, and non-determinism. Developer Tools: A gateway is overkill when you're pinned to a single provider and model.
When should I avoid pi-mcp-adapter?
AI Agents: Don't use an agent loop when a deterministic workflow would do; agents add latency, cost, and non-determinism. Developer Tools: A gateway is overkill when you're pinned to a single provider and model. LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves.
Is cc-switch or pi-mcp-adapter more popular on GitHub?
cc-switch has more GitHub stars (115,863 vs 982). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.
Are cc-switch and pi-mcp-adapter open source?
Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (cc-switch: MIT, pi-mcp-adapter: MIT).
Where can I find alternatives to cc-switch or pi-mcp-adapter?
GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at cc-switch alternatives and pi-mcp-adapter alternatives (cc-switch markdown twin, pi-mcp-adapter markdown twin), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.
Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?
Yes. The markdown twin at this comparison mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.
Which is better maintained, cc-switch or pi-mcp-adapter?
cc-switch: Very active. pi-mcp-adapter: Active. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.
Where are the full trust reports for cc-switch and pi-mcp-adapter?
GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: cc-switch trust report; pi-mcp-adapter trust report.