Home/Compare/cc-switch vs flock

Comparison

cc-switch vs flock

Verdict

Pick cc-switch when license: cc-switch is MIT, flock is Apache-2.0; pick flock when license: flock is Apache-2.0, cc-switch is MIT.

Markdown twin · cc-switch alternatives · flock alternatives

GraphCanon updated today

cc-switch logo

cc-switch

farion1231/cc-switch

116kpushed Jul 11, 2026
vs
flock logo

flock

Onelevenvy/flock

1.1kpushed Jul 7, 2026

Trust & integrity

Signalcc-switchflock
Maintenance
Very active (0d since push)
As of today · github_public_v1
Very active (4d since push)
As of today · github_public_v1
Provenance
Not a fork · Personal account
As of today · github_public_v1
Not a fork · Personal account
As of today · github_public_v1
Security (OSV)
No MCP manifest
As of today · mcp_manifest
No MCP manifest
As of today · mcp_manifest

Tagline

cc-switch
A cross-platform desktop All-in-One assistant for Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, OpenClaw, Gemini CLI & Hermes Agent. Only official website: ccswitch.io
flock
A desktop multi-agent harness built with Rust, Tauri, and React, powered by langgraph-rust.

Stars

cc-switch
116k
flock
1.1k

Forks

cc-switch
7.8k
flock
140

Open issues

cc-switch
1.9k
flock
1

Language

cc-switch
Rust
flock
Rust

Adopt for

cc-switch
-
flock
-

Persona

cc-switch
-
flock
-

Runtime

cc-switch
-
flock
-

License

cc-switch
MIT
flock
Apache-2.0

Last pushed

cc-switch
Jul 11, 2026
flock
Jul 7, 2026

Categories

cc-switch
AI Agents, Developer Tools
flock
AI Agents, LLM Frameworks, Developer Tools

Trust and health

Days since push

cc-switch
0d
flock
4d

Open issues (now)

cc-switch
1.9k
flock
1

Full report

cc-switch
Trust report

Choose cc-switch if…

  • License: cc-switch is MIT, flock is Apache-2.0.
  • Tags unique to cc-switch: hermes-agent, hermes, codex, desktop-app.
  • More GitHub stars (116k vs 1.1k) - visibility, not fit.

When NOT to use cc-switch

  • AI Agents: Don't use an agent loop when a deterministic workflow would do; agents add latency, cost, and non-determinism.
  • Developer Tools: A gateway is overkill when you're pinned to a single provider and model.

Choose flock if…

  • License: flock is Apache-2.0, cc-switch is MIT.
  • Tags unique to flock: deekseek, ai, langgraph-rust, harness.
  • Also covers LLM Frameworks.

When NOT to use flock

  • AI Agents: Don't use an agent loop when a deterministic workflow would do; agents add latency, cost, and non-determinism.
  • LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves.
  • Developer Tools: A gateway is overkill when you're pinned to a single provider and model.

Explore

Sources

Every stat on this page traces to a dated GitHub sync, license file, enrichment field, or trust scan.

GitHub stars on cards: cc-switch 116k · flock 1.1k (synced Jul 11, 2026).

Common questions

What is the difference between cc-switch and flock?
cc-switch: A cross-platform desktop All-in-One assistant for Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, OpenClaw, Gemini CLI & Hermes Agent. Only official website: ccswitch.io. flock: A desktop multi-agent harness built with Rust, Tauri, and React, powered by langgraph-rust.. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.
When should I choose cc-switch over flock?
Choose cc-switch over flock when License: cc-switch is MIT, flock is Apache-2.0; Tags unique to cc-switch: hermes-agent, hermes, codex, desktop-app; More GitHub stars (116k vs 1.1k) - visibility, not fit.
When should I choose flock over cc-switch?
Choose flock over cc-switch when License: flock is Apache-2.0, cc-switch is MIT; Tags unique to flock: deekseek, ai, langgraph-rust, harness; Also covers LLM Frameworks.
When should I avoid cc-switch?
AI Agents: Don't use an agent loop when a deterministic workflow would do; agents add latency, cost, and non-determinism. Developer Tools: A gateway is overkill when you're pinned to a single provider and model.
When should I avoid flock?
AI Agents: Don't use an agent loop when a deterministic workflow would do; agents add latency, cost, and non-determinism. LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves. Developer Tools: A gateway is overkill when you're pinned to a single provider and model.
Is cc-switch or flock more popular on GitHub?
cc-switch has more GitHub stars (115,863 vs 1,091). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.
Are cc-switch and flock open source?
Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (cc-switch: MIT, flock: Apache-2.0).
Where can I find alternatives to cc-switch or flock?
GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at cc-switch alternatives and flock alternatives (cc-switch markdown twin, flock markdown twin), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.
Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?
Yes. The markdown twin at this comparison mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.
Which is better maintained, cc-switch or flock?
cc-switch: Very active. flock: Very active. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.
Where are the full trust reports for cc-switch and flock?
GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: cc-switch trust report; flock trust report.