GraphCanon
Home/Compare/cc-switch vs lean-ctx

Comparison

cc-switch vs lean-ctx

Verdict

Pick cc-switch when license: cc-switch is MIT, lean-ctx is Apache-2.0; pick lean-ctx when license: lean-ctx is Apache-2.0, cc-switch is MIT.

Markdown twin · cc-switch alternatives · lean-ctx alternatives

GraphCanon updated today

cc-switch logo

cc-switch

farion1231/cc-switch

★ 116kpushed Jul 11, 2026
vs
lean-ctx logo

lean-ctx

yvgude/lean-ctx

★ 3.2kpushed Jul 11, 2026

Trust & integrity

Signalcc-switchlean-ctx
Maintenance
Very active (0d since push)
As of today · github_public_v1
Very active (0d since push)
As of today · github_public_v1
Provenance
Not a fork · Personal account
As of today · github_public_v1
Not a fork · Personal account
As of today · github_public_v1
Security (OSV)
No MCP manifest
As of today · mcp_manifest
No MCP manifest
As of today · mcp_manifest
cc-switch trust reportlean-ctx trust reportTrust methodology

Tagline

cc-switch
A cross-platform desktop All-in-One assistant for Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, OpenClaw, Gemini CLI & Hermes Agent. Only official website: ccswitch.io
lean-ctx
Control what your AI can see. LeanCTX (Lean Context) is the context intelligence layer for AI agents — one local Rust binary that decides what they read, remembers what they learn, guards what they to

Stars

cc-switch
116k
lean-ctx
3.2k

Forks

cc-switch
7.8k
lean-ctx
295

Open issues

cc-switch
1.9k
lean-ctx
4

Language

cc-switch
Rust
lean-ctx
Rust

Adopt for

cc-switch
-
lean-ctx
-

Persona

cc-switch
-
lean-ctx
-

Runtime

cc-switch
-
lean-ctx
-

License

cc-switch
MIT
lean-ctx
Apache-2.0

Last pushed

cc-switch
Jul 11, 2026
lean-ctx
Jul 11, 2026

Categories

cc-switch
AI Agents, Developer Tools
lean-ctx
LLM Frameworks, AI Agents, Developer Tools

Trust and health

Open issues (now)

cc-switch
1.9k
lean-ctx
4

Full report

cc-switch
Trust report
lean-ctx
Trust report

Choose cc-switch if…

  • License: cc-switch is MIT, lean-ctx is Apache-2.0.
  • Tags unique to cc-switch: hermes-agent, hermes, codex, desktop-app.
  • More GitHub stars (116k vs 3.2k) - visibility, not fit.

When NOT to use cc-switch

  • AI Agents: Don't use an agent loop when a deterministic workflow would do; agents add latency, cost, and non-determinism.
  • Developer Tools: A gateway is overkill when you're pinned to a single provider and model.
GitHubDetails

Choose lean-ctx if…

  • License: lean-ctx is Apache-2.0, cc-switch is MIT.
  • Tags unique to lean-ctx: context-layer, ai-coding, ai, context-intelligence.
  • Also covers LLM Frameworks.

When NOT to use lean-ctx

  • LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves.
  • AI Agents: Don't use an agent loop when a deterministic workflow would do; agents add latency, cost, and non-determinism.
  • Developer Tools: A gateway is overkill when you're pinned to a single provider and model.
GitHubDetails

Explore

cc-switch trust report →lean-ctx trust report →AI Agents category →Developer Tools category →LLM Frameworks category →All comparisonsStack workflowsTrending tools

Sources

Every stat on this page traces to a dated GitHub sync, license file, enrichment field, or trust scan.

GitHub stars on cards: cc-switch 116k · lean-ctx 3.2k (synced Jul 11, 2026).

Common questions

What is the difference between cc-switch and lean-ctx?
cc-switch: A cross-platform desktop All-in-One assistant for Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, OpenClaw, Gemini CLI & Hermes Agent. Only official website: ccswitch.io. lean-ctx: Control what your AI can see. LeanCTX (Lean Context) is the context intelligence layer for AI agents — one local Rust binary that decides what they read, remembers what they learn, guards what they to. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.
When should I choose cc-switch over lean-ctx?
Choose cc-switch over lean-ctx when License: cc-switch is MIT, lean-ctx is Apache-2.0; Tags unique to cc-switch: hermes-agent, hermes, codex, desktop-app; More GitHub stars (116k vs 3.2k) - visibility, not fit.
When should I choose lean-ctx over cc-switch?
Choose lean-ctx over cc-switch when License: lean-ctx is Apache-2.0, cc-switch is MIT; Tags unique to lean-ctx: context-layer, ai-coding, ai, context-intelligence; Also covers LLM Frameworks.
When should I avoid cc-switch?
AI Agents: Don't use an agent loop when a deterministic workflow would do; agents add latency, cost, and non-determinism. Developer Tools: A gateway is overkill when you're pinned to a single provider and model.
When should I avoid lean-ctx?
LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves. AI Agents: Don't use an agent loop when a deterministic workflow would do; agents add latency, cost, and non-determinism. Developer Tools: A gateway is overkill when you're pinned to a single provider and model.
Is cc-switch or lean-ctx more popular on GitHub?
cc-switch has more GitHub stars (115,863 vs 3,221). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.
Are cc-switch and lean-ctx open source?
Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (cc-switch: MIT, lean-ctx: Apache-2.0).
Where can I find alternatives to cc-switch or lean-ctx?
GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at cc-switch alternatives and lean-ctx alternatives (cc-switch markdown twin, lean-ctx markdown twin), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.
Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?
Yes. The markdown twin at this comparison mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.
Which is better maintained, cc-switch or lean-ctx?
cc-switch: Very active. lean-ctx: Very active. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.
Where are the full trust reports for cc-switch and lean-ctx?
GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: cc-switch trust report; lean-ctx trust report.