Home/Compare/eko vs moby

Comparison

eko vs moby

Verdict

Pick eko when eko is primarily TypeScript; moby is Go; pick moby when moby is primarily Go; eko is TypeScript.

Markdown twin · eko alternatives · moby alternatives

GraphCanon updated today

eko logo

eko

FellouAI/eko

4.9kpushed Mar 3, 2026
vs
moby logo

moby

moby/moby

72kpushed Jul 10, 2026

Trust & integrity

Signalekomoby
Maintenance
Slowing (130d since push)
As of today · github_public_v1
Very active (1d since push)
As of today · github_public_v1
Provenance
Not a fork · Organization account
As of today · github_public_v1
Not a fork · Organization account
As of today · github_public_v1
Security (OSV)
No lockfile
As of today · none
No criticals
As of today · osv@v1

Tagline

eko
Eko (Eko Keeps Operating) - Build Production-ready Agentic Workflow with Natural Language - eko.fellou.ai
moby
The Moby Project - a collaborative project for the container ecosystem to assemble container-based systems

Stars

eko
4.9k
moby
72k

Forks

eko
440
moby
19k

Open issues

eko
11
moby
3.8k

Language

eko
TypeScript
moby
Go

Adopt for

eko
-
moby
-

Persona

eko
-
moby
-

Runtime

eko
-
moby
-

License

eko
MIT
moby
Apache-2.0

Last pushed

eko
Mar 3, 2026
moby
Jul 10, 2026

Categories

eko
AI Agents, LLM Frameworks, Inference & Serving
moby
LLM Frameworks, Developer Tools, Inference & Serving

Trust and health

Maintenance

eko
Slowing (36%)
moby
Very active (96%)

Days since push

eko
130d
moby
1d

Open issues (now)

eko
11
moby
3.8k

Security scan

eko
No lockfile
moby
No criticals

Full report

Choose eko if…

  • eko is primarily TypeScript; moby is Go.
  • License: eko is MIT, moby is Apache-2.0.
  • Tags unique to eko: agents, agentic-framework, agentic-workflow, browser-automation.
  • Also covers AI Agents.

When NOT to use eko

  • Last GitHub push was 130 days ago (slowing maintenance, Mar 3, 2026). Validate activity before betting a new project on eko.
  • AI Agents: Don't use an agent loop when a deterministic workflow would do; agents add latency, cost, and non-determinism.
  • LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves.
  • Inference & Serving: Self-hosting rarely beats a hosted API on cost until you have steady, high-volume traffic.

Choose moby if…

  • moby is primarily Go; eko is TypeScript.
  • License: moby is Apache-2.0, eko is MIT.
  • Tags unique to moby: go, docker, golang, containers.
  • Also covers Developer Tools.
  • moby ships Docker support for self-hosted deployment.

When NOT to use moby

  • LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves.
  • Developer Tools: A gateway is overkill when you're pinned to a single provider and model.
  • Inference & Serving: Self-hosting rarely beats a hosted API on cost until you have steady, high-volume traffic.

Explore

Sources

Every stat on this page traces to a dated GitHub sync, license file, enrichment field, or trust scan.

GitHub stars on cards: eko 4.9k · moby 72k (synced Jul 11, 2026).

Common questions

What is the difference between eko and moby?
eko: Eko (Eko Keeps Operating) - Build Production-ready Agentic Workflow with Natural Language - eko.fellou.ai. moby: The Moby Project - a collaborative project for the container ecosystem to assemble container-based systems. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.
When should I choose eko over moby?
Choose eko over moby when eko is primarily TypeScript; moby is Go; License: eko is MIT, moby is Apache-2.0; Tags unique to eko: agents, agentic-framework, agentic-workflow, browser-automation; Also covers AI Agents.
When should I choose moby over eko?
Choose moby over eko when moby is primarily Go; eko is TypeScript; License: moby is Apache-2.0, eko is MIT; Tags unique to moby: go, docker, golang, containers; Also covers Developer Tools; moby ships Docker support for self-hosted deployment.
When should I avoid eko?
Last GitHub push was 130 days ago (slowing maintenance, Mar 3, 2026). Validate activity before betting a new project on eko. AI Agents: Don't use an agent loop when a deterministic workflow would do; agents add latency, cost, and non-determinism. LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves. Inference & Serving: Self-hosting rarely beats a hosted API on cost until you have steady, high-volume traffic.
When should I avoid moby?
LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves. Developer Tools: A gateway is overkill when you're pinned to a single provider and model. Inference & Serving: Self-hosting rarely beats a hosted API on cost until you have steady, high-volume traffic.
Is eko or moby more popular on GitHub?
moby has more GitHub stars (71,899 vs 4,937). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.
Are eko and moby open source?
Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (eko: MIT, moby: Apache-2.0).
Where can I find alternatives to eko or moby?
GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at eko alternatives and moby alternatives (eko markdown twin, moby markdown twin), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.
Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?
Yes. The markdown twin at this comparison mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.
Which is better maintained, eko or moby?
eko: Slowing. moby: Very active. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.
Where are the full trust reports for eko and moby?
GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: eko trust report; moby trust report.