Home/Compare/ai-gateway vs GPTRouter

Comparison

ai-gateway vs GPTRouter

Verdict

Pick ai-gateway if ai-gateway from Ferro Labs supports over 30 LLMs with integrated caching, guardrails, A/B testing, and cost controls, making it ideal for managing multiple language models in a production environment; pick GPTRouter if gPTRouter is notable for TypeScript and handles multiple LLMs and image models like OpenAI, Anthropic, Azure, Dall-E, SDXL with improved reliability and speed.

Markdown twin · ai-gateway alternatives · GPTRouter alternatives

GraphCanon updated 1w

ai-gateway logo

ai-gateway

ferro-labs/ai-gateway

219pushed Aug 7, 2026
vs
GPTRouter logo

GPTRouter

Writesonic/GPTRouter

455pushed Apr 10, 2024

Trust & integrity

Signalai-gatewayGPTRouter
Maintenance
Very active (2d since push)
As of 1w · github_public_v1
Dormant (832d since push)
As of 3w · github_public_v1
Provenance
Not a fork · Organization account
As of 1w · github_public_v1
Not a fork · Organization account
As of 3w · github_public_v1
OSV dependency advisories
Published findings
As of 1mo · osv@v1
No lockfile (source not queried)
As of 1mo · osv@v1
deps.dev advisories
Not queried
deps.dev@v1
Not queried
deps.dev@v1
OpenSSF Scorecard
Not queried
openssf-scorecard@v1
Not queried
openssf-scorecard@v1

Tagline

ai-gateway
Unified AI Gateway for multiple LLMs with caching, guardrails, A/B testing, and cost controls
GPTRouter
Manage multiple LLMs and image models for reliable and fast responses

Stars

ai-gateway
219
GPTRouter
455

Forks

ai-gateway
33
GPTRouter
38

Open issues

ai-gateway
63
GPTRouter
10

Language

ai-gateway
Go
GPTRouter
TypeScript

Adopt for

ai-gateway
ai-gateway from Ferro Labs supports over 30 LLMs with integrated caching, guardrails, A/B testing, and cost controls, making it ideal for managing multiple language models in a production environment.
GPTRouter
GPTRouter is notable for TypeScript and handles multiple LLMs and image models like OpenAI, Anthropic, Azure, Dall-E, SDXL with improved reliability and speed.

Persona

ai-gateway
-
GPTRouter
-

Runtime

ai-gateway
-
GPTRouter
-

License

ai-gateway
Apache-2.0 - a permissive free software license
GPTRouter
The MIT license applies to GPTRouter, offering permissive use with conditions only requiring preservation of copyright and license notices.

Last pushed

ai-gateway
Aug 7, 2026
GPTRouter
Apr 10, 2024

Categories

ai-gateway
Inference & Serving, Model Training
GPTRouter
Inference & Serving, LLM Frameworks, Model Training

Trust and health

Maintenance

ai-gateway
Very active (96%)
GPTRouter
Dormant (18%)

Days since push

ai-gateway
2d
GPTRouter
832d

Open issues (now)

ai-gateway
63
GPTRouter
10

OSV dependency advisories

ai-gateway
Published findings
GPTRouter
No lockfile (source not queried)

Full report

ai-gateway
Trust report
GPTRouter
Trust report

Choose ai-gateway if…

  • ai-gateway is primarily Go; GPTRouter is TypeScript.
  • License: ai-gateway is Apache-2.0, GPTRouter is MIT.
  • Tags unique to ai-gateway: ai-gateway, litellm, llm-cost, llm-proxy.
  • When you need to integrate more than 30 different LLM services including OpenAI and Anthropic

When NOT to use ai-gateway

  • If your project only involves one or two LLMs which does not necessitate the gateway's broad compatibility features
  • For small-scale projects that do not require comprehensive cost analysis tools
  • When custom integration for specific guardrails is required, as ai-gateway offers generalized settings

Choose GPTRouter if…

  • GPTRouter is primarily TypeScript; ai-gateway is Go.
  • License: GPTRouter is MIT, ai-gateway is Apache-2.0.
  • Pricing: GPTRouter is open-source under the MIT License. However, costs might arise from using associated models like OpenAI or Anthropic..
  • Requirements: Min 2 GB RAM.
  • Tags unique to GPTRouter: anthropic, azure-openai, cohere, google-gemini.
  • Also covers LLM Frameworks.
  • GPTRouter ships Docker support for self-hosted deployment.
  • When your project requires seamless integration of different language models such as OpenAI, Anthropic, and Azure and demands reliability and fast response times.

When NOT to use GPTRouter

  • Avoid using GPTRouter if your project strictly uses Python without the flexibility to adopt TypeScript, as it may hinder seamless integration.
  • If your application exclusively focuses on a single LLM or image model provider lacking the need for managing multiple providers, consider alternatives more focused in scope and potentially lighter.

Explore

Sources

Every stat on this page traces to a dated GitHub sync, license file, enrichment field, or trust scan.

GitHub stars on cards: ai-gateway 219 · GPTRouter 455 (synced Aug 9, 2026).

Common questions

What is the difference between ai-gateway and GPTRouter?
ai-gateway: Unified AI Gateway for multiple LLMs with caching, guardrails, A/B testing, and cost controls. GPTRouter: Manage multiple LLMs and image models for reliable and fast responses. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.
When should I choose ai-gateway over GPTRouter?
Choose ai-gateway over GPTRouter when ai-gateway is primarily Go; GPTRouter is TypeScript; License: ai-gateway is Apache-2.0, GPTRouter is MIT; Tags unique to ai-gateway: ai-gateway, litellm, llm-cost, llm-proxy; When you need to integrate more than 30 different LLM services including OpenAI and Anthropic.
When should I choose GPTRouter over ai-gateway?
Choose GPTRouter over ai-gateway when GPTRouter is primarily TypeScript; ai-gateway is Go; License: GPTRouter is MIT, ai-gateway is Apache-2.0; Pricing: GPTRouter is open-source under the MIT License. However, costs might arise from using associated models like OpenAI or Anthropic.; Requirements: Min 2 GB RAM; Tags unique to GPTRouter: anthropic, azure-openai, cohere, google-gemini; Also covers LLM Frameworks; GPTRouter ships Docker support for self-hosted deployment; When your project requires seamless integration of different language models such as OpenAI, Anthropic, and Azure and demands reliability and fast response times.
When should I avoid ai-gateway?
If your project only involves one or two LLMs which does not necessitate the gateway's broad compatibility features For small-scale projects that do not require comprehensive cost analysis tools When custom integration for specific guardrails is required, as ai-gateway offers generalized settings
When should I avoid GPTRouter?
Avoid using GPTRouter if your project strictly uses Python without the flexibility to adopt TypeScript, as it may hinder seamless integration. If your application exclusively focuses on a single LLM or image model provider lacking the need for managing multiple providers, consider alternatives more focused in scope and potentially lighter.
Is ai-gateway or GPTRouter more popular on GitHub?
GPTRouter has more GitHub stars (455 vs 219). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.
Are ai-gateway and GPTRouter open source?
Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (ai-gateway: Apache-2.0, GPTRouter: MIT).
Where can I find alternatives to ai-gateway or GPTRouter?
GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at ai-gateway alternatives and GPTRouter alternatives (ai-gateway markdown twin, GPTRouter markdown twin), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.
Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?
Yes. The markdown twin at this comparison mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.
Which is better maintained, ai-gateway or GPTRouter?
ai-gateway: Very active. GPTRouter: Dormant. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.
Where are the full trust reports for ai-gateway and GPTRouter?
GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: ai-gateway trust report; GPTRouter trust report.

Was this helpful?

Anonymous feedback helps us improve pages and translations.