Comparison
firecrawl-mcp-server vs moby
Verdict
Pick firecrawl-mcp-server when firecrawl-mcp-server is primarily JavaScript; moby is Go; pick moby when moby is primarily Go; firecrawl-mcp-server is JavaScript.
Markdown twin · firecrawl-mcp-server alternatives · moby alternatives
GraphCanon updated today
vs
Trust & integrity
| Signal | firecrawl-mcp-server | moby |
|---|---|---|
| Maintenance | Very active (0d since push) As of today · github_public_v1 | Very active (1d since push) As of today · github_public_v1 |
| Provenance | Not a fork · Organization account As of today · github_public_v1 | Not a fork · Organization account As of today · github_public_v1 |
| Security (OSV) | No MCP manifest As of today · mcp_manifest | No criticals As of today · osv@v1 |
Tagline
- firecrawl-mcp-server
- 🔥 Official Firecrawl MCP Server - Adds powerful web scraping and search to Cursor, Claude and any other LLM clients.
- moby
- The Moby Project - a collaborative project for the container ecosystem to assemble container-based systems
Stars
- firecrawl-mcp-server
- 6.9k
- moby
- 72k
Forks
- firecrawl-mcp-server
- 801
- moby
- 19k
Open issues
- firecrawl-mcp-server
- 129
- moby
- 3.8k
Language
- firecrawl-mcp-server
- JavaScript
- moby
- Go
Adopt for
- firecrawl-mcp-server
- -
- moby
- -
Persona
- firecrawl-mcp-server
- -
- moby
- -
Runtime
- firecrawl-mcp-server
- -
- moby
- -
License
- firecrawl-mcp-server
- MIT
- moby
- Apache-2.0
Last pushed
- firecrawl-mcp-server
- Jul 10, 2026
- moby
- Jul 10, 2026
Categories
- firecrawl-mcp-server
- LLM Frameworks, Data & Retrieval, Developer Tools
- moby
- LLM Frameworks, Developer Tools, Inference & Serving
Trust and health
Days since push
- firecrawl-mcp-server
- 0d
- moby
- 1d
Open issues (now)
- firecrawl-mcp-server
- 129
- moby
- 3.8k
Security scan
- firecrawl-mcp-server
- No MCP manifest
- moby
- No criticals
Full report
- firecrawl-mcp-server
- Trust report
- moby
- Trust report
Choose firecrawl-mcp-server if…
- firecrawl-mcp-server is primarily JavaScript; moby is Go.
- License: firecrawl-mcp-server is MIT, moby is Apache-2.0.
- Tags unique to firecrawl-mcp-server: content-extraction, data-collection, batch-processing, firecrawl.
- Also covers Data & Retrieval.
When NOT to use firecrawl-mcp-server
- LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves.
- Data & Retrieval: Skip a heavy ingestion framework when your corpus is small and static; a script plus the embedding API is enough.
- Developer Tools: A gateway is overkill when you're pinned to a single provider and model.
Choose moby if…
- moby is primarily Go; firecrawl-mcp-server is JavaScript.
- License: moby is Apache-2.0, firecrawl-mcp-server is MIT.
- Tags unique to moby: go, docker, golang, containers.
- Also covers Inference & Serving.
- moby ships Docker support for self-hosted deployment.
When NOT to use moby
- LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves.
- Developer Tools: A gateway is overkill when you're pinned to a single provider and model.
- Inference & Serving: Self-hosting rarely beats a hosted API on cost until you have steady, high-volume traffic.
Explore
Sources
Every stat on this page traces to a dated GitHub sync, license file, enrichment field, or trust scan.
- GitHub stars (firecrawl/firecrawl-mcp-server) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- GitHub forks (firecrawl/firecrawl-mcp-server) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- Last push (firecrawl/firecrawl-mcp-server) · observed Jul 10, 2026
- License file (MIT) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- Trust scan (lockfile / OSV) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- GitHub stars (moby/moby) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- GitHub forks (moby/moby) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- Last push (moby/moby) · observed Jul 10, 2026
- License file (Apache-2.0) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- Trust scan (lockfile / OSV) · observed Jul 11, 2026
GitHub stars on cards: firecrawl-mcp-server 6.9k · moby 72k (synced Jul 11, 2026).
Common questions
- What is the difference between firecrawl-mcp-server and moby?
- firecrawl-mcp-server: 🔥 Official Firecrawl MCP Server - Adds powerful web scraping and search to Cursor, Claude and any other LLM clients.. moby: The Moby Project - a collaborative project for the container ecosystem to assemble container-based systems. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.
- When should I choose firecrawl-mcp-server over moby?
- Choose firecrawl-mcp-server over moby when firecrawl-mcp-server is primarily JavaScript; moby is Go; License: firecrawl-mcp-server is MIT, moby is Apache-2.0; Tags unique to firecrawl-mcp-server: content-extraction, data-collection, batch-processing, firecrawl; Also covers Data & Retrieval.
- When should I choose moby over firecrawl-mcp-server?
- Choose moby over firecrawl-mcp-server when moby is primarily Go; firecrawl-mcp-server is JavaScript; License: moby is Apache-2.0, firecrawl-mcp-server is MIT; Tags unique to moby: go, docker, golang, containers; Also covers Inference & Serving; moby ships Docker support for self-hosted deployment.
- When should I avoid firecrawl-mcp-server?
- LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves. Data & Retrieval: Skip a heavy ingestion framework when your corpus is small and static; a script plus the embedding API is enough. Developer Tools: A gateway is overkill when you're pinned to a single provider and model.
- When should I avoid moby?
- LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves. Developer Tools: A gateway is overkill when you're pinned to a single provider and model. Inference & Serving: Self-hosting rarely beats a hosted API on cost until you have steady, high-volume traffic.
- Is firecrawl-mcp-server or moby more popular on GitHub?
- moby has more GitHub stars (71,899 vs 6,908). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.
- Are firecrawl-mcp-server and moby open source?
- Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (firecrawl-mcp-server: MIT, moby: Apache-2.0).
- Where can I find alternatives to firecrawl-mcp-server or moby?
- GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at firecrawl-mcp-server alternatives and moby alternatives (firecrawl-mcp-server markdown twin, moby markdown twin), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.
- Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?
- Yes. The markdown twin at this comparison mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.
- Which is better maintained, firecrawl-mcp-server or moby?
- firecrawl-mcp-server: Very active. moby: Very active. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.
- Where are the full trust reports for firecrawl-mcp-server and moby?
- GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: firecrawl-mcp-server trust report; moby trust report.