Home/Compare/firecrawl vs stealth-browser-mcp

Comparison

firecrawl vs stealth-browser-mcp

Verdict

Pick firecrawl when firecrawl is primarily TypeScript; stealth-browser-mcp is Python; pick stealth-browser-mcp when stealth-browser-mcp is primarily Python; firecrawl is TypeScript.

Markdown twin · firecrawl alternatives · stealth-browser-mcp alternatives

GraphCanon updated today

firecrawl logo

firecrawl

firecrawl/firecrawl

149kpushed Jul 11, 2026
vs
stealth-browser-mcp logo

stealth-browser-mcp

vibheksoni/stealth-browser-mcp

1.5kpushed May 24, 2026

Trust & integrity

Signalfirecrawlstealth-browser-mcp
Maintenance
Very active (0d since push)
As of today · github_public_v1
Steady (47d since push)
As of today · github_public_v1
Provenance
Not a fork · Organization account
As of today · github_public_v1
Not a fork · Personal account
As of today · github_public_v1
Security (OSV)
No lockfile
As of today · none
No MCP manifest
As of today · mcp_manifest

Tagline

firecrawl
The API to search, scrape, and interact with the web at scale. 🔥
stealth-browser-mcp
The only browser automation that bypasses anti-bot systems. AI writes network hooks, clones UIs pixel-perfect via simple chat.

Stars

firecrawl
149k
stealth-browser-mcp
1.5k

Forks

firecrawl
8.5k
stealth-browser-mcp
227

Open issues

firecrawl
395
stealth-browser-mcp
1

Language

firecrawl
TypeScript
stealth-browser-mcp
Python

Adopt for

firecrawl
FireCrawl is an API-driven toolkit built for conducting scalable searches, scraping tasks, and interactive operations with the web using AI agents.
stealth-browser-mcp
-

Persona

firecrawl
-
stealth-browser-mcp
-

Runtime

firecrawl
-
stealth-browser-mcp
-

License

firecrawl
AGPL-3.0 license requires that any changes to FireCrawl's source code also be made available as free software when the adapted version is used.
stealth-browser-mcp
MIT

Last pushed

firecrawl
Jul 11, 2026
stealth-browser-mcp
May 24, 2026

Categories

firecrawl
AI Agents, Data & Retrieval
stealth-browser-mcp
AI Agents, Data & Retrieval, Developer Tools

Trust and health

Maintenance

firecrawl
Very active (96%)
stealth-browser-mcp
Steady (60%)

Days since push

firecrawl
0d
stealth-browser-mcp
47d

Open issues (now)

firecrawl
395
stealth-browser-mcp
1

Owner type

firecrawl
Organization
stealth-browser-mcp
User

Security scan

firecrawl
No lockfile
stealth-browser-mcp
No MCP manifest

Full report

firecrawl
Trust report
stealth-browser-mcp
Trust report

Choose firecrawl if…

  • firecrawl is primarily TypeScript; stealth-browser-mcp is Python.
  • License: firecrawl is AGPL-3.0, stealth-browser-mcp is MIT.
  • FireCrawl can be deployed on your infrastructure, giving you complete control over where and how the API interacts with web data.
  • Requirements: Min 4 GB RAM; Requires Docker.
  • Tags unique to firecrawl: webscraping, scraping, search, crawler.
  • When you need to automate complex web interactions that require understanding context or content from multiple sources, leveraging its AI agent capabilities.

When NOT to use firecrawl

  • For lightweight scraping tasks where minimal data extraction is sufficient and speed is of utmost importance without the need for advanced AI analysis.
  • If you require open-source components under a license other than AGPL-3.0, as this license may impose certain restrictions on derivative works.

Choose stealth-browser-mcp if…

  • stealth-browser-mcp is primarily Python; firecrawl is TypeScript.
  • License: stealth-browser-mcp is MIT, firecrawl is AGPL-3.0.
  • Tags unique to stealth-browser-mcp: claude-mcp, ai-agent-tools, anti-bot-bypass, browser-automation.
  • Also covers Developer Tools.

When NOT to use stealth-browser-mcp

  • AI Agents: Don't use an agent loop when a deterministic workflow would do; agents add latency, cost, and non-determinism.
  • Data & Retrieval: Skip a heavy ingestion framework when your corpus is small and static; a script plus the embedding API is enough.
  • Developer Tools: A gateway is overkill when you're pinned to a single provider and model.

Explore

Sources

Every stat on this page traces to a dated GitHub sync, license file, enrichment field, or trust scan.

GitHub stars on cards: firecrawl 149k · stealth-browser-mcp 1.5k (synced Jul 11, 2026).

Common questions

What is the difference between firecrawl and stealth-browser-mcp?
firecrawl: The API to search, scrape, and interact with the web at scale. 🔥. stealth-browser-mcp: The only browser automation that bypasses anti-bot systems. AI writes network hooks, clones UIs pixel-perfect via simple chat.. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.
When should I choose firecrawl over stealth-browser-mcp?
Choose firecrawl over stealth-browser-mcp when firecrawl is primarily TypeScript; stealth-browser-mcp is Python; License: firecrawl is AGPL-3.0, stealth-browser-mcp is MIT; FireCrawl can be deployed on your infrastructure, giving you complete control over where and how the API interacts with web data; Requirements: Min 4 GB RAM; Requires Docker; Tags unique to firecrawl: webscraping, scraping, search, crawler; When you need to automate complex web interactions that require understanding context or content from multiple sources, leveraging its AI agent capabilities.
When should I choose stealth-browser-mcp over firecrawl?
Choose stealth-browser-mcp over firecrawl when stealth-browser-mcp is primarily Python; firecrawl is TypeScript; License: stealth-browser-mcp is MIT, firecrawl is AGPL-3.0; Tags unique to stealth-browser-mcp: claude-mcp, ai-agent-tools, anti-bot-bypass, browser-automation; Also covers Developer Tools.
When should I avoid firecrawl?
For lightweight scraping tasks where minimal data extraction is sufficient and speed is of utmost importance without the need for advanced AI analysis. If you require open-source components under a license other than AGPL-3.0, as this license may impose certain restrictions on derivative works.
When should I avoid stealth-browser-mcp?
AI Agents: Don't use an agent loop when a deterministic workflow would do; agents add latency, cost, and non-determinism. Data & Retrieval: Skip a heavy ingestion framework when your corpus is small and static; a script plus the embedding API is enough. Developer Tools: A gateway is overkill when you're pinned to a single provider and model.
Is firecrawl or stealth-browser-mcp more popular on GitHub?
firecrawl has more GitHub stars (149,109 vs 1,501). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.
Are firecrawl and stealth-browser-mcp open source?
Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (firecrawl: AGPL-3.0, stealth-browser-mcp: MIT).
Where can I find alternatives to firecrawl or stealth-browser-mcp?
GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at firecrawl alternatives and stealth-browser-mcp alternatives (firecrawl markdown twin, stealth-browser-mcp markdown twin), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.
Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?
Yes. The markdown twin at this comparison mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.
Which is better maintained, firecrawl or stealth-browser-mcp?
firecrawl: Very active. stealth-browser-mcp: Steady. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.
Where are the full trust reports for firecrawl and stealth-browser-mcp?
GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: firecrawl trust report; stealth-browser-mcp trust report.