Home/Compare/CosyVoice vs MeloTTS

Comparison

CosyVoice vs MeloTTS

Verdict

Pick CosyVoice when license: CosyVoice is Apache-2.0, MeloTTS is MIT; pick MeloTTS when license: MeloTTS is MIT, CosyVoice is Apache-2.0.

Markdown twin · CosyVoice alternatives · MeloTTS alternatives

GraphCanon updated today

CosyVoice logo

CosyVoice

FunAudioLLM/CosyVoice

22kpushed May 25, 2026
vs
MeloTTS logo

MeloTTS

myshell-ai/MeloTTS

7.5kpushed Dec 24, 2024

Trust & integrity

SignalCosyVoiceMeloTTS
Maintenance
Steady (46d since push)
As of today · github_public_v1
Dormant (563d since push)
As of today · github_public_v1
Provenance
Not a fork · Organization account
As of today · github_public_v1
Not a fork · Organization account
As of today · github_public_v1
Security (OSV)
No lockfile
As of today · none
46 low (46 low)
As of today · osv@v1

Tagline

CosyVoice
Multi-lingual large voice generation model with full-stack abilities for inference, training and deployment.
MeloTTS
High-quality multi-lingual text-to-speech library by MyShell.ai. Support English, Spanish, French, Chinese, Japanese and Korean.

Stars

CosyVoice
22k
MeloTTS
7.5k

Forks

CosyVoice
2.5k
MeloTTS
1.1k

Open issues

CosyVoice
767
MeloTTS
232

Language

CosyVoice
Python
MeloTTS
Python

Adopt for

CosyVoice
CosyVoice is a Python-based multi-lingual large voice generation model. It supports extensive capabilities including fine-tuning, TTS (Text-To-Speech), and natural language generation.
MeloTTS
-

Persona

CosyVoice
-
MeloTTS
-

Runtime

CosyVoice
-
MeloTTS
-

License

CosyVoice
Apache-2.0
MeloTTS
MIT

Last pushed

CosyVoice
May 25, 2026
MeloTTS
Dec 24, 2024

Categories

CosyVoice
Model Training, Speech & Audio, Inference & Serving
MeloTTS
Speech & Audio

Trust and health

Maintenance

CosyVoice
Steady (60%)
MeloTTS
Dormant (18%)

Days since push

CosyVoice
46d
MeloTTS
563d

Open issues (now)

CosyVoice
767
MeloTTS
232

Security scan

CosyVoice
No lockfile
MeloTTS
46 low (46 low)

Full report

CosyVoice
Trust report

Choose CosyVoice if…

  • License: CosyVoice is Apache-2.0, MeloTTS is MIT.
  • Tags unique to CosyVoice: cantonese, audio-generation, cross-lingual, cosyvoice.
  • Also covers Model Training, Inference & Serving.
  • When you need support for multiple languages like Cantonese, Chinese, English, Japanese, and Korean.

When NOT to use CosyVoice

  • If your project specifically requires fine-tuned performance in languages not supported by CosyVoice such as Arabic or Spanish.
  • When strict real-time speech synthesis requirements are essential, as CosyVoice may face delays depending on the environment's computational power and model complexity.

Choose MeloTTS if…

  • License: MeloTTS is MIT, CosyVoice is Apache-2.0.
  • Tags unique to MeloTTS: text-to-speech, multilingual, spanish, french.
  • MeloTTS ships Docker support for self-hosted deployment.

When NOT to use MeloTTS

  • Last GitHub push was 564 days ago (dormant maintenance, Dec 24, 2024). Validate activity before betting a new project on MeloTTS.

Explore

Sources

Every stat on this page traces to a dated GitHub sync, license file, enrichment field, or trust scan.

GitHub stars on cards: CosyVoice 22k · MeloTTS 7.5k (synced Jul 11, 2026).

Common questions

What is the difference between CosyVoice and MeloTTS?
CosyVoice: Multi-lingual large voice generation model with full-stack abilities for inference, training and deployment.. MeloTTS: High-quality multi-lingual text-to-speech library by MyShell.ai. Support English, Spanish, French, Chinese, Japanese and Korean.. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.
When should I choose CosyVoice over MeloTTS?
Choose CosyVoice over MeloTTS when License: CosyVoice is Apache-2.0, MeloTTS is MIT; Tags unique to CosyVoice: cantonese, audio-generation, cross-lingual, cosyvoice; Also covers Model Training, Inference & Serving; When you need support for multiple languages like Cantonese, Chinese, English, Japanese, and Korean.
When should I choose MeloTTS over CosyVoice?
Choose MeloTTS over CosyVoice when License: MeloTTS is MIT, CosyVoice is Apache-2.0; Tags unique to MeloTTS: text-to-speech, multilingual, spanish, french; MeloTTS ships Docker support for self-hosted deployment.
When should I avoid CosyVoice?
If your project specifically requires fine-tuned performance in languages not supported by CosyVoice such as Arabic or Spanish. When strict real-time speech synthesis requirements are essential, as CosyVoice may face delays depending on the environment's computational power and model complexity.
When should I avoid MeloTTS?
Last GitHub push was 564 days ago (dormant maintenance, Dec 24, 2024). Validate activity before betting a new project on MeloTTS.
Is CosyVoice or MeloTTS more popular on GitHub?
CosyVoice has more GitHub stars (22,089 vs 7,535). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.
Are CosyVoice and MeloTTS open source?
Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (CosyVoice: Apache-2.0, MeloTTS: MIT).
Where can I find alternatives to CosyVoice or MeloTTS?
GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at CosyVoice alternatives and MeloTTS alternatives (CosyVoice markdown twin, MeloTTS markdown twin), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.
Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?
Yes. The markdown twin at this comparison mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.
Which is better maintained, CosyVoice or MeloTTS?
CosyVoice: Steady. MeloTTS: Dormant. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.
Where are the full trust reports for CosyVoice and MeloTTS?
GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: CosyVoice trust report; MeloTTS trust report.