Home/Compare/future-agi vs moby

Comparison

future-agi vs moby

Verdict

Pick future-agi when future-agi is primarily Python; moby is Go; pick moby when moby is primarily Go; future-agi is Python.

Markdown twin · future-agi alternatives · moby alternatives

GraphCanon updated today

future-agi logo

future-agi

future-agi/future-agi

1.4kpushed Jul 11, 2026
vs
moby logo

moby

moby/moby

72kpushed Jul 10, 2026

Trust & integrity

Signalfuture-agimoby
Maintenance
Very active (0d since push)
As of today · github_public_v1
Very active (1d since push)
As of today · github_public_v1
Provenance
Not a fork · Organization account
As of today · github_public_v1
Not a fork · Organization account
As of today · github_public_v1
Security (OSV)
No lockfile
As of today · none
No criticals
As of today · osv@v1

Tagline

future-agi
Open-source, end-to-end platform for evaluating, observing, and improving LLM and AI agent applications. Tracing · Evals · Simulations · Datasets · Gateway · Guardrails. Self-hostable. Apache 2.0.
moby
The Moby Project - a collaborative project for the container ecosystem to assemble container-based systems

Stars

future-agi
1.4k
moby
72k

Forks

future-agi
368
moby
19k

Open issues

future-agi
437
moby
3.8k

Language

future-agi
Python
moby
Go

Adopt for

future-agi
-
moby
-

Persona

future-agi
-
moby
-

Runtime

future-agi
-
moby
-

License

future-agi
Apache-2.0
moby
Apache-2.0

Last pushed

future-agi
Jul 11, 2026
moby
Jul 10, 2026

Categories

future-agi
LLM Frameworks, AI Agents, Inference & Serving
moby
LLM Frameworks, Developer Tools, Inference & Serving

Trust and health

Days since push

future-agi
0d
moby
1d

Open issues (now)

future-agi
437
moby
3.8k

Security scan

future-agi
No lockfile
moby
No criticals

Full report

future-agi
Trust report

Choose future-agi if…

  • future-agi is primarily Python; moby is Go.
  • Tags unique to future-agi: llm, ai, python, evals.
  • Also covers AI Agents.

When NOT to use future-agi

  • LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves.
  • AI Agents: Don't use an agent loop when a deterministic workflow would do; agents add latency, cost, and non-determinism.
  • Inference & Serving: Self-hosting rarely beats a hosted API on cost until you have steady, high-volume traffic.

Choose moby if…

  • moby is primarily Go; future-agi is Python.
  • Tags unique to moby: go, docker, golang, containers.
  • Also covers Developer Tools.

When NOT to use moby

  • LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves.
  • Developer Tools: A gateway is overkill when you're pinned to a single provider and model.
  • Inference & Serving: Self-hosting rarely beats a hosted API on cost until you have steady, high-volume traffic.

Explore

Sources

Every stat on this page traces to a dated GitHub sync, license file, enrichment field, or trust scan.

GitHub stars on cards: future-agi 1.4k · moby 72k (synced Jul 11, 2026).

Common questions

What is the difference between future-agi and moby?
future-agi: Open-source, end-to-end platform for evaluating, observing, and improving LLM and AI agent applications. Tracing · Evals · Simulations · Datasets · Gateway · Guardrails. Self-hostable. Apache 2.0.. moby: The Moby Project - a collaborative project for the container ecosystem to assemble container-based systems. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.
When should I choose future-agi over moby?
Choose future-agi over moby when future-agi is primarily Python; moby is Go; Tags unique to future-agi: llm, ai, python, evals; Also covers AI Agents.
When should I choose moby over future-agi?
Choose moby over future-agi when moby is primarily Go; future-agi is Python; Tags unique to moby: go, docker, golang, containers; Also covers Developer Tools.
When should I avoid future-agi?
LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves. AI Agents: Don't use an agent loop when a deterministic workflow would do; agents add latency, cost, and non-determinism. Inference & Serving: Self-hosting rarely beats a hosted API on cost until you have steady, high-volume traffic.
When should I avoid moby?
LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves. Developer Tools: A gateway is overkill when you're pinned to a single provider and model. Inference & Serving: Self-hosting rarely beats a hosted API on cost until you have steady, high-volume traffic.
Is future-agi or moby more popular on GitHub?
moby has more GitHub stars (71,899 vs 1,373). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.
Are future-agi and moby open source?
Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (future-agi: Apache-2.0, moby: Apache-2.0).
Where can I find alternatives to future-agi or moby?
GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at future-agi alternatives and moby alternatives (future-agi markdown twin, moby markdown twin), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.
Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?
Yes. The markdown twin at this comparison mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.
Which is better maintained, future-agi or moby?
future-agi: Very active. moby: Very active. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.
Where are the full trust reports for future-agi and moby?
GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: future-agi trust report; moby trust report.