Home/Compare/future-agi vs gateway

Comparison

future-agi vs gateway

Verdict

Pick future-agi if future-AGI is an open-source platform for evaluating and observing LLM and AI agent applications, offering features like tracing, evaluations, simulations, and guardrails. It is self-hostable and supports deployment via,; pick gateway if a high-performance AI Gateway named 'gateway', supporting over 1,600 LLM connections and featuring various guardrail mechanisms for safer utilization.

Markdown twin · future-agi alternatives · gateway alternatives

GraphCanon updated Sep 20, 2026

7views this month

future-agi logo

future-agi

future-agi/future-agi

★ 2.0kpushed Sep 18, 2026
vs
gateway logo

gateway

Portkey-AI/gateway

★ 13kpushed May 25, 2026

Trust & integrity

Signalfuture-agigateway
Maintenance
Very active (0d since push)
As of Sep 18, 2026 · github_public_v1
Slowing (104d since push)
As of Sep 7, 2026 · github_public_v1
Provenance
Not a fork · Organization account
As of Sep 18, 2026 · github_public_v1
Not a fork · Organization account
As of Sep 7, 2026 · github_public_v1
OSV dependency advisories
No lockfile (source not queried)
As of Sep 18, 2026 · osv@v1
No lockfile (source not queried)
As of Jul 11, 2026 · osv@v1
deps.dev advisories
Not queried
deps.dev@v1
Not queried
deps.dev@v1
OpenSSF Scorecard
Not queried
openssf-scorecard@v1
Not queried
openssf-scorecard@v1

Tagline

future-agi
Open-source, end-to-end platform for evaluating, observing, and improving LLM and AI agent applications
gateway
A high-performance AI Gateway connecting to over 1,600 LLMs with guardrails.

Stars

future-agi
2.0k
gateway
13k

Forks

future-agi
627
gateway
1.3k

Open issues

future-agi
961
gateway
258

Language

future-agi
Python
gateway
TypeScript

Adopt for

future-agi
Future-AGI is an open-source platform for evaluating and observing LLM and AI agent applications, offering features like tracing, evaluations, simulations, and guardrails. It is self-hostable and supports deployment via,
gateway
A high-performance AI Gateway named 'gateway', supporting over 1,600 LLM connections and featuring various guardrail mechanisms for safer utilization.

Persona

future-agi
-
gateway
-

Runtime

future-agi
-
gateway
-

License

future-agi
Apache License 2.0, allowing for free use, modification, and distribution of the software, with the condition that any derivative works also be licensed under the same terms.
gateway
MIT

Last pushed

future-agi
Sep 18, 2026
gateway
May 25, 2026

Categories

future-agi
AI Agents, Evaluation & Observability, LLM Frameworks
gateway
Evaluation & Observability, LLM Frameworks

Trust and health

Maintenance

future-agi
Very active (96%)
gateway
Slowing (36%)

Days since push

future-agi
0d
gateway
104d

Open issues (now)

future-agi
961
gateway
258

Stars delta

future-agi
+473 (30d)
gateway
+252 (30d)

Open issues delta

future-agi
+365 (30d)
gateway
+16 (30d)

Full report

future-agi
Trust report

Choose future-agi if…

  • future-agi is primarily Python; gateway is TypeScript.
  • License: future-agi is Apache-2.0, gateway is MIT.
  • Pricing: The core platform is free and open-source under the Apache License 2.0. However, for managed services or additional support, contact sales for pricing..
  • Requirements: Min 4 GB RAM; Requires Docker; Future-AGI requires Docker for deployment, with support for Docker Compose and upcoming Kubernetes and Helm support.; For production environments, a setup script is provided to generate secrets and pin image tags, ensuring a secure and reproducible deployment..
  • Tags unique to future-agi: ai-agents, ai-evals, ai-optimization, ai-simulations.
  • Also covers AI Agents.
  • You need a self-hostable solution that does not phone home, ensuring full control over your data and evaluation logic.

When NOT to use future-agi

  • You require immediate Kubernetes or Helm support, as these are not yet available, though they are in development.
  • You are seeking a managed service or a solution available through AWS Marketplace, as these options are not yet available, though they are planned for the future.
  • Your project is in a highly dynamic environment where frequent updates and vendor support are critical, as Future-AGI is a community-driven project with a focus on self-hosting and open-source.

Choose gateway if…

  • gateway is primarily TypeScript; future-agi is Python.
  • License: gateway is MIT, future-agi is Apache-2.0.
  • Pricing: The service is open source and MIT licensed; specific pricing for related services (if any) not detailed in repository..
  • Requirements: Developed using TypeScript; no Docker requirement specified for operation or development..
  • Tags unique to gateway: gateway, generative-ai, langchain, llm.
  • Use gateway when you need a versatile platform capable of connecting to more than 1,600 LLM providers.

When NOT to use gateway

  • Avoid using gateway if your application only requires connection to a limited number of LLM providers, as its extensive provider support might introduce unnecessary complexity.
  • If you don't require sophisticated cost management features such as smart caching or usage analytics provided by the tool, consider simpler alternatives.

Explore

Sources

Every stat on this page traces to a dated GitHub sync, license file, enrichment field, or trust scan.

GitHub stars on cards: future-agi 2.0k · gateway 13k (synced Sep 20, 2026).

Common questions

What is the difference between future-agi and gateway?
future-agi: Open-source, end-to-end platform for evaluating, observing, and improving LLM and AI agent applications. gateway: A high-performance AI Gateway connecting to over 1,600 LLMs with guardrails.. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.
When should I choose future-agi over gateway?
Choose future-agi over gateway when future-agi is primarily Python; gateway is TypeScript; License: future-agi is Apache-2.0, gateway is MIT; Pricing: The core platform is free and open-source under the Apache License 2.0. However, for managed services or additional support, contact sales for pricing.; Requirements: Min 4 GB RAM; Requires Docker; Future-AGI requires Docker for deployment, with support for Docker Compose and upcoming Kubernetes and Helm support.; For production environments, a setup script is provided to generate secrets and pin image tags, ensuring a secure and reproducible deployment.; Tags unique to future-agi: ai-agents, ai-evals, ai-optimization, ai-simulations; Also covers AI Agents; You need a self-hostable solution that does not phone home, ensuring full control over your data and evaluation logic.
When should I choose gateway over future-agi?
Choose gateway over future-agi when gateway is primarily TypeScript; future-agi is Python; License: gateway is MIT, future-agi is Apache-2.0; Pricing: The service is open source and MIT licensed; specific pricing for related services (if any) not detailed in repository.; Requirements: Developed using TypeScript; no Docker requirement specified for operation or development.; Tags unique to gateway: gateway, generative-ai, langchain, llm; Use gateway when you need a versatile platform capable of connecting to more than 1,600 LLM providers.
When should I avoid future-agi?
You require immediate Kubernetes or Helm support, as these are not yet available, though they are in development. You are seeking a managed service or a solution available through AWS Marketplace, as these options are not yet available, though they are planned for the future. Your project is in a highly dynamic environment where frequent updates and vendor support are critical, as Future-AGI is a community-driven project with a focus on self-hosting and open-source.
When should I avoid gateway?
Avoid using gateway if your application only requires connection to a limited number of LLM providers, as its extensive provider support might introduce unnecessary complexity. If you don't require sophisticated cost management features such as smart caching or usage analytics provided by the tool, consider simpler alternatives.
Is future-agi or gateway more popular on GitHub?
gateway has more GitHub stars (12,920 vs 2,032). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.
Are future-agi and gateway open source?
Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (future-agi: Apache-2.0, gateway: MIT).
Where can I find alternatives to future-agi or gateway?
GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at future-agi alternatives and gateway alternatives (future-agi markdown twin, gateway markdown twin), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.
Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?
Yes. The markdown twin at this comparison mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.
Which is better maintained, future-agi or gateway?
future-agi: Very active. gateway: Slowing. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.
Where are the full trust reports for future-agi and gateway?
GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: future-agi trust report; gateway trust report.

Was this helpful?

Anonymous feedback helps us improve pages and translations.