Comparison
future-agi vs ClawBench
Verdict
Pick future-agi if future-AGI is an open-source platform for evaluating and observing LLM and AI agent applications, offering features like tracing, evaluations, simulations, and guardrails. It is self-hostable and supports deployment via,; pick ClawBench if clawBench offers an open-source benchmark framework for evaluating browser-based AI agents on real-world online tasks.
Markdown twin · future-agi alternatives · ClawBench alternatives
GraphCanon updated Sep 20, 2026
5views this month
vs
Trust & integrity
| Signal | future-agi | ClawBench |
|---|---|---|
| Maintenance | Very active (0d since push) As of Sep 18, 2026 · github_public_v1 | Very active (0d since push) As of Sep 20, 2026 · github_public_v1 |
| Provenance | Not a fork · Organization account As of Sep 18, 2026 · github_public_v1 | Not a fork · Organization account As of Sep 20, 2026 · github_public_v1 |
| OSV dependency advisories | No lockfile (source not queried) As of Sep 18, 2026 · osv@v1 | No lockfile (source not queried) As of Jul 11, 2026 · osv@v1 |
| deps.dev advisories | Not queried deps.dev@v1 | Not queried deps.dev@v1 |
| OpenSSF Scorecard | Not queried openssf-scorecard@v1 | Not queried openssf-scorecard@v1 |
Tagline
- future-agi
- Open-source, end-to-end platform for evaluating, observing, and improving LLM and AI agent applications
- ClawBench
- Open-source benchmark for browser AI agents on daily tasks
Stars
- future-agi
- 2.0k
- ClawBench
- 796
Forks
- future-agi
- 627
- ClawBench
- 58
Open issues
- future-agi
- 961
- ClawBench
- 46
Language
- future-agi
- Python
- ClawBench
- Python
Adopt for
- future-agi
- Future-AGI is an open-source platform for evaluating and observing LLM and AI agent applications, offering features like tracing, evaluations, simulations, and guardrails. It is self-hostable and supports deployment via,
- ClawBench
- ClawBench offers an open-source benchmark framework for evaluating browser-based AI agents on real-world online tasks.
Persona
- future-agi
- -
- ClawBench
- -
Runtime
- future-agi
- -
- ClawBench
- -
License
- future-agi
- Apache License 2.0, allowing for free use, modification, and distribution of the software, with the condition that any derivative works also be licensed under the same terms.
- ClawBench
- ClawBench operates under the Apache-2.0 license, offering a permissive free software license that encourages software reuse and interoperability.
Last pushed
- future-agi
- Sep 18, 2026
- ClawBench
- Sep 20, 2026
Categories
- future-agi
- AI Agents, Evaluation & Observability, LLM Frameworks
- ClawBench
- AI Agents, Evaluation & Observability
Trust and health
Open issues (now)
- future-agi
- 961
- ClawBench
- 46
Stars delta
- future-agi
- +473 (30d)
- ClawBench
- +264 (30d)
Open issues delta
- future-agi
- +365 (30d)
- ClawBench
- -1 (30d)
Full report
- future-agi
- Trust report
- ClawBench
- Trust report
Choose future-agi if…
- Pricing: The core platform is free and open-source under the Apache License 2.0. However, for managed services or additional support, contact sales for pricing..
- Requirements: Min 4 GB RAM; Requires Docker; Future-AGI requires Docker for deployment, with support for Docker Compose and upcoming Kubernetes and Helm support.; For production environments, a setup script is provided to generate secrets and pin image tags, ensuring a secure and reproducible deployment..
- Tags unique to future-agi: ai-agents, ai-evals, ai-gateway, ai-optimization.
- Also covers LLM Frameworks.
- future-agi ships Docker support for self-hosted deployment.
- You need a self-hostable solution that does not phone home, ensuring full control over your data and evaluation logic.
When NOT to use future-agi
- You require immediate Kubernetes or Helm support, as these are not yet available, though they are in development.
- You are seeking a managed service or a solution available through AWS Marketplace, as these options are not yet available, though they are planned for the future.
- Your project is in a highly dynamic environment where frequent updates and vendor support are critical, as Future-AGI is a community-driven project with a focus on self-hosting and open-source.
Choose ClawBench if…
- Requirements: Requires setup for browser automation tasks within the Chrome environment..
- Tags unique to ClawBench: agent-evaluation, agentic-ai, browser-agent, llm-evaluation.
- You are developing a browser AI agent and wish to measure its performance against everyday online activities, as ClawBench specifically simulates these scenarios.
When NOT to use ClawBench
- If your focus is solely on backend server-based AI evaluations without a browser interface involvement, ClawBench will not be the appropriate choice.
- For those developing standalone applications or mobile agents, ClawBench’s browser-centric tasks will not reflect their operational capabilities accurately.
Explore
Sources
Every stat on this page traces to a dated GitHub sync, license file, enrichment field, or trust scan.
- GitHub stars (future-agi/future-agi) · observed Sep 20, 2026
- GitHub forks (future-agi/future-agi) · observed Sep 20, 2026
- Last push (future-agi/future-agi) · observed Sep 18, 2026
- License file (Apache-2.0) · observed Sep 20, 2026
- Decision facts (enrichment) · observed Sep 18, 2026
- Trust scan (lockfile / OSV) · observed Sep 18, 2026
- GitHub stars (TIGER-AI-Lab/ClawBench) · observed Sep 20, 2026
- GitHub forks (TIGER-AI-Lab/ClawBench) · observed Sep 20, 2026
- Last push (TIGER-AI-Lab/ClawBench) · observed Sep 20, 2026
- License file (Apache-2.0) · observed Sep 20, 2026
- Decision facts (enrichment) · observed Jul 16, 2026
- Trust scan (lockfile / OSV) · observed Jul 11, 2026
GitHub stars on cards: future-agi 2.0k · ClawBench 796 (synced Sep 20, 2026).
Common questions
- What is the difference between future-agi and ClawBench?
- future-agi: Open-source, end-to-end platform for evaluating, observing, and improving LLM and AI agent applications. ClawBench: Open-source benchmark for browser AI agents on daily tasks. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.
- When should I choose future-agi over ClawBench?
- Choose future-agi over ClawBench when Pricing: The core platform is free and open-source under the Apache License 2.0. However, for managed services or additional support, contact sales for pricing.; Requirements: Min 4 GB RAM; Requires Docker; Future-AGI requires Docker for deployment, with support for Docker Compose and upcoming Kubernetes and Helm support.; For production environments, a setup script is provided to generate secrets and pin image tags, ensuring a secure and reproducible deployment.; Tags unique to future-agi: ai-agents, ai-evals, ai-gateway, ai-optimization; Also covers LLM Frameworks; future-agi ships Docker support for self-hosted deployment; You need a self-hostable solution that does not phone home, ensuring full control over your data and evaluation logic.
- When should I choose ClawBench over future-agi?
- Choose ClawBench over future-agi when Requirements: Requires setup for browser automation tasks within the Chrome environment.; Tags unique to ClawBench: agent-evaluation, agentic-ai, browser-agent, llm-evaluation; You are developing a browser AI agent and wish to measure its performance against everyday online activities, as ClawBench specifically simulates these scenarios.
- When should I avoid future-agi?
- You require immediate Kubernetes or Helm support, as these are not yet available, though they are in development. You are seeking a managed service or a solution available through AWS Marketplace, as these options are not yet available, though they are planned for the future. Your project is in a highly dynamic environment where frequent updates and vendor support are critical, as Future-AGI is a community-driven project with a focus on self-hosting and open-source.
- When should I avoid ClawBench?
- If your focus is solely on backend server-based AI evaluations without a browser interface involvement, ClawBench will not be the appropriate choice. For those developing standalone applications or mobile agents, ClawBench’s browser-centric tasks will not reflect their operational capabilities accurately.
- Is future-agi or ClawBench more popular on GitHub?
- future-agi has more GitHub stars (2,032 vs 796). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.
- Are future-agi and ClawBench open source?
- Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (future-agi: Apache-2.0, ClawBench: Apache-2.0).
- Where can I find alternatives to future-agi or ClawBench?
- GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at future-agi alternatives and ClawBench alternatives (future-agi markdown twin, ClawBench markdown twin), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.
- Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?
- Yes. The markdown twin at this comparison mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.
- Which is better maintained, future-agi or ClawBench?
- future-agi: Very active. ClawBench: Very active. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.
- Where are the full trust reports for future-agi and ClawBench?
- GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: future-agi trust report; ClawBench trust report.