Comparison
Made-With-ML vs LLMs-from-scratch
Verdict
Pick Made-With-ML when license: Made-With-ML is MIT, LLMs-from-scratch is Other; pick LLMs-from-scratch when license: LLMs-from-scratch is Other, Made-With-ML is MIT.
Markdown twin · Made-With-ML alternatives · LLMs-from-scratch alternatives
GraphCanon updated today
vs
Trust & integrity
| Signal | Made-With-ML | LLMs-from-scratch |
|---|---|---|
| Maintenance | Slowing (132d since push) As of today · github_public_v1 | Steady (38d since push) As of 4d · github_public_v1 |
| Provenance | Not a fork · Personal account As of today · github_public_v1 | Not a fork · Personal account As of 4d · github_public_v1 |
| OSV dependency advisories | Published findings As of today · osv@v1 | No lockfile (source not queried) As of 4d · osv@v1 |
| deps.dev advisories | Not queried deps.dev@v1 | Not queried deps.dev@v1 |
| OpenSSF Scorecard | Not queried openssf-scorecard@v1 | Not queried openssf-scorecard@v1 |
Tagline
- Made-With-ML
- Learn how to develop, deploy and iterate on production-grade ML applications.
- LLMs-from-scratch
- Implement a ChatGPT-like LLM in PyTorch from scratch, step by step
Stars
- Made-With-ML
- 49k
- LLMs-from-scratch
- 99k
Forks
- Made-With-ML
- 7.7k
- LLMs-from-scratch
- 15k
Open issues
- Made-With-ML
- 27
- LLMs-from-scratch
- 4
Language
- Made-With-ML
- Jupyter Notebook
- LLMs-from-scratch
- Jupyter Notebook
Adopt for
- Made-With-ML
- -
- LLMs-from-scratch
- LLMs-from-scratch is a project-oriented repository aimed at building PyTorch-based language models from the ground up, with detailed step-by-step instructions.
Persona
- Made-With-ML
- -
- LLMs-from-scratch
- -
Runtime
- Made-With-ML
- -
- LLMs-from-scratch
- -
License
- Made-With-ML
- MIT
- LLMs-from-scratch
- Other
Last pushed
- Made-With-ML
- Mar 4, 2026
- LLMs-from-scratch
- Jun 2, 2026
Categories
- Made-With-ML
- AI Agents, LLM Frameworks, Model Training
- LLMs-from-scratch
- LLM Frameworks, Model Training
Trust and health
Maintenance
- Made-With-ML
- Slowing (36%)
- LLMs-from-scratch
- Steady (60%)
Days since push
- Made-With-ML
- 132d
- LLMs-from-scratch
- 38d
Open issues (now)
- Made-With-ML
- 27
- LLMs-from-scratch
- 4
OSV dependency advisories
- Made-With-ML
- Published findings
- LLMs-from-scratch
- No lockfile (source not queried)
Full report
- Made-With-ML
- Trust report
- LLMs-from-scratch
- Trust report
Choose Made-With-ML if…
- License: Made-With-ML is MIT, LLMs-from-scratch is Other.
- Tags unique to Made-With-ML: data-engineering, data-quality, data-science, distributed-ml.
- Also covers AI Agents.
When NOT to use Made-With-ML
- Last GitHub push was 132 days ago (slowing maintenance, Mar 4, 2026). Validate activity before betting a new project on Made-With-ML.
- AI Agents: Don't use an agent loop when a deterministic workflow would do; agents add latency, cost, and non-determinism.
- LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves.
- Model Training: Try prompting and RAG first; fine-tuning is the answer to style/format, not missing knowledge.
Choose LLMs-from-scratch if…
- License: LLMs-from-scratch is Other, Made-With-ML is MIT.
- Tags unique to LLMs-from-scratch: ai, artificial-intelligence, attention-mechanism, finetuning.
- - You are an advanced practitioner aiming to fully understand the underpinnings of LLMs using PyTorch as your primary framework.
When NOT to use LLMs-from-scratch
- - If you are looking for a rapid deployment of an LLM without understanding its intricate structure - this tool requires extensive manual and conceptual work.
- - You prefer frameworks with automatic model generation or other high-level abstractions that simplify the process. This repository emphasizes manual creation, which is more time-consuming but offers
- a deeper learning experience.
Explore
Sources
Every stat on this page traces to a dated GitHub sync, license file, enrichment field, or trust scan.
- GitHub stars (GokuMohandas/Made-With-ML) · observed Jul 15, 2026
- GitHub forks (GokuMohandas/Made-With-ML) · observed Jul 15, 2026
- Last push (GokuMohandas/Made-With-ML) · observed Mar 4, 2026
- License file (MIT) · observed Jul 15, 2026
- Trust scan (lockfile / OSV) · observed Jul 15, 2026
- GitHub stars (rasbt/LLMs-from-scratch) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- GitHub forks (rasbt/LLMs-from-scratch) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- Last push (rasbt/LLMs-from-scratch) · observed Jun 2, 2026
- License file (Other) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- Decision facts (enrichment) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- Trust scan (lockfile / OSV) · observed Jul 11, 2026
GitHub stars on cards: Made-With-ML 49k · LLMs-from-scratch 99k (synced Jul 15, 2026).
Common questions
- What is the difference between Made-With-ML and LLMs-from-scratch?
- Made-With-ML: Learn how to develop, deploy and iterate on production-grade ML applications.. LLMs-from-scratch: Implement a ChatGPT-like LLM in PyTorch from scratch, step by step. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.
- When should I choose Made-With-ML over LLMs-from-scratch?
- Choose Made-With-ML over LLMs-from-scratch when License: Made-With-ML is MIT, LLMs-from-scratch is Other; Tags unique to Made-With-ML: data-engineering, data-quality, data-science, distributed-ml; Also covers AI Agents.
- When should I choose LLMs-from-scratch over Made-With-ML?
- Choose LLMs-from-scratch over Made-With-ML when License: LLMs-from-scratch is Other, Made-With-ML is MIT; Tags unique to LLMs-from-scratch: ai, artificial-intelligence, attention-mechanism, finetuning; - You are an advanced practitioner aiming to fully understand the underpinnings of LLMs using PyTorch as your primary framework.
- When should I avoid Made-With-ML?
- Last GitHub push was 132 days ago (slowing maintenance, Mar 4, 2026). Validate activity before betting a new project on Made-With-ML. AI Agents: Don't use an agent loop when a deterministic workflow would do; agents add latency, cost, and non-determinism. LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves. Model Training: Try prompting and RAG first; fine-tuning is the answer to style/format, not missing knowledge.
- When should I avoid LLMs-from-scratch?
- - If you are looking for a rapid deployment of an LLM without understanding its intricate structure - this tool requires extensive manual and conceptual work. - You prefer frameworks with automatic model generation or other high-level abstractions that simplify the process. This repository emphasizes manual creation, which is more time-consuming but offers a deeper learning experience.
- Is Made-With-ML or LLMs-from-scratch more popular on GitHub?
- LLMs-from-scratch has more GitHub stars (98,899 vs 48,703). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.
- Are Made-With-ML and LLMs-from-scratch open source?
- Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (Made-With-ML: MIT, LLMs-from-scratch: Other).
- Where can I find alternatives to Made-With-ML or LLMs-from-scratch?
- GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at Made-With-ML alternatives and LLMs-from-scratch alternatives (Made-With-ML markdown twin, LLMs-from-scratch markdown twin), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.
- Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?
- Yes. The markdown twin at this comparison mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.
- Which is better maintained, Made-With-ML or LLMs-from-scratch?
- Made-With-ML: Slowing. LLMs-from-scratch: Steady. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.
- Where are the full trust reports for Made-With-ML and LLMs-from-scratch?
- GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: Made-With-ML trust report; LLMs-from-scratch trust report.