Home/Compare/Made-With-ML vs Open-LLM-Leaderboard

Comparison

Made-With-ML vs Open-LLM-Leaderboard

Verdict

Pick Made-With-ML when made-With-ML is primarily Jupyter Notebook; Open-LLM-Leaderboard is Python; pick Open-LLM-Leaderboard when open-LLM-Leaderboard is primarily Python; Made-With-ML is Jupyter Notebook.

Markdown twin · Made-With-ML alternatives · Open-LLM-Leaderboard alternatives

GraphCanon updated today

Made-With-ML logo

Made-With-ML

GokuMohandas/Made-With-ML

49kpushed Mar 4, 2026
vs
Open-LLM-Leaderboard logo

Open-LLM-Leaderboard

VILA-Lab/Open-LLM-Leaderboard

53pushed Jun 27, 2024

Trust & integrity

SignalMade-With-MLOpen-LLM-Leaderboard
Maintenance
Slowing (132d since push)
As of today · github_public_v1
Dormant (747d since push)
As of today · github_public_v1
Provenance
Not a fork · Personal account
As of today · github_public_v1
Not a fork · Organization account
As of today · github_public_v1
OSV dependency advisories
Published findings
As of today · osv@v1
No lockfile (source not queried)
As of today · osv@v1
deps.dev advisories
Not queried
deps.dev@v1
Not queried
deps.dev@v1
OpenSSF Scorecard
Not queried
openssf-scorecard@v1
Not queried
openssf-scorecard@v1

Tagline

Made-With-ML
Learn how to develop, deploy and iterate on production-grade ML applications.
Open-LLM-Leaderboard
Open-LLM-Leaderboard: Open-Style Question Evaluation. Paper at https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.07545

Stars

Made-With-ML
49k
Open-LLM-Leaderboard
53

Forks

Made-With-ML
7.7k
Open-LLM-Leaderboard
7

Open issues

Made-With-ML
27
Open-LLM-Leaderboard
1

Language

Made-With-ML
Jupyter Notebook
Open-LLM-Leaderboard
Python

Adopt for

Made-With-ML
-
Open-LLM-Leaderboard
-

Persona

Made-With-ML
-
Open-LLM-Leaderboard
-

Runtime

Made-With-ML
-
Open-LLM-Leaderboard
-

License

Made-With-ML
MIT
Open-LLM-Leaderboard
CC-BY-4.0

Last pushed

Made-With-ML
Mar 4, 2026
Open-LLM-Leaderboard
Jun 27, 2024

Categories

Made-With-ML
AI Agents, LLM Frameworks, Model Training
Open-LLM-Leaderboard
Evaluation & Observability, LLM Frameworks, Model Training

Trust and health

Maintenance

Made-With-ML
Slowing (36%)
Open-LLM-Leaderboard
Dormant (18%)

Days since push

Made-With-ML
132d
Open-LLM-Leaderboard
747d

Open issues (now)

Made-With-ML
27
Open-LLM-Leaderboard
1

Owner type

Made-With-ML
User
Open-LLM-Leaderboard
Organization

OSV dependency advisories

Made-With-ML
Published findings
Open-LLM-Leaderboard
No lockfile (source not queried)

Full report

Made-With-ML
Trust report
Open-LLM-Leaderboard
Trust report

Shared compatibility

  • Python · Made-With-ML: Python runtime · Open-LLM-Leaderboard: Python runtime

Choose Made-With-ML if…

  • Made-With-ML is primarily Jupyter Notebook; Open-LLM-Leaderboard is Python.
  • License: Made-With-ML is MIT, Open-LLM-Leaderboard is CC-BY-4.0.
  • Tags unique to Made-With-ML: data-engineering, data-quality, data-science, deep-learning.
  • Also covers AI Agents.

When NOT to use Made-With-ML

  • Last GitHub push was 132 days ago (slowing maintenance, Mar 4, 2026). Validate activity before betting a new project on Made-With-ML.
  • AI Agents: Don't use an agent loop when a deterministic workflow would do; agents add latency, cost, and non-determinism.
  • LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves.
  • Model Training: Try prompting and RAG first; fine-tuning is the answer to style/format, not missing knowledge.

Choose Open-LLM-Leaderboard if…

  • Open-LLM-Leaderboard is primarily Python; Made-With-ML is Jupyter Notebook.
  • License: Open-LLM-Leaderboard is CC-BY-4.0, Made-With-ML is MIT.
  • Tags unique to Open-LLM-Leaderboard: leaderboard, llm-evaluation, llm-leaderboard, open-ended-evaluation.
  • Also covers Evaluation & Observability.

When NOT to use Open-LLM-Leaderboard

  • Last GitHub push was 748 days ago (dormant maintenance, Jun 27, 2024). Validate activity before betting a new project on Open-LLM-Leaderboard.
  • Evaluation & Observability: Defer heavyweight eval infra only until you have real traffic - never skip it once users depend on answers.
  • LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves.
  • Model Training: Try prompting and RAG first; fine-tuning is the answer to style/format, not missing knowledge.

Explore

Sources

Every stat on this page traces to a dated GitHub sync, license file, enrichment field, or trust scan.

GitHub stars on cards: Made-With-ML 49k · Open-LLM-Leaderboard 53 (synced Jul 15, 2026).

Common questions

What is the difference between Made-With-ML and Open-LLM-Leaderboard?
Made-With-ML: Learn how to develop, deploy and iterate on production-grade ML applications.. Open-LLM-Leaderboard: Open-LLM-Leaderboard: Open-Style Question Evaluation. Paper at https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.07545. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.
When should I choose Made-With-ML over Open-LLM-Leaderboard?
Choose Made-With-ML over Open-LLM-Leaderboard when Made-With-ML is primarily Jupyter Notebook; Open-LLM-Leaderboard is Python; License: Made-With-ML is MIT, Open-LLM-Leaderboard is CC-BY-4.0; Tags unique to Made-With-ML: data-engineering, data-quality, data-science, deep-learning; Also covers AI Agents.
When should I choose Open-LLM-Leaderboard over Made-With-ML?
Choose Open-LLM-Leaderboard over Made-With-ML when Open-LLM-Leaderboard is primarily Python; Made-With-ML is Jupyter Notebook; License: Open-LLM-Leaderboard is CC-BY-4.0, Made-With-ML is MIT; Tags unique to Open-LLM-Leaderboard: leaderboard, llm-evaluation, llm-leaderboard, open-ended-evaluation; Also covers Evaluation & Observability.
When should I avoid Made-With-ML?
Last GitHub push was 132 days ago (slowing maintenance, Mar 4, 2026). Validate activity before betting a new project on Made-With-ML. AI Agents: Don't use an agent loop when a deterministic workflow would do; agents add latency, cost, and non-determinism. LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves. Model Training: Try prompting and RAG first; fine-tuning is the answer to style/format, not missing knowledge.
When should I avoid Open-LLM-Leaderboard?
Last GitHub push was 748 days ago (dormant maintenance, Jun 27, 2024). Validate activity before betting a new project on Open-LLM-Leaderboard. Evaluation & Observability: Defer heavyweight eval infra only until you have real traffic - never skip it once users depend on answers. LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves. Model Training: Try prompting and RAG first; fine-tuning is the answer to style/format, not missing knowledge.
Is Made-With-ML or Open-LLM-Leaderboard more popular on GitHub?
Made-With-ML has more GitHub stars (48,703 vs 53). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.
Are Made-With-ML and Open-LLM-Leaderboard open source?
Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (Made-With-ML: MIT, Open-LLM-Leaderboard: CC-BY-4.0).
Where can I find alternatives to Made-With-ML or Open-LLM-Leaderboard?
GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at Made-With-ML alternatives and Open-LLM-Leaderboard alternatives (Made-With-ML markdown twin, Open-LLM-Leaderboard markdown twin), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.
Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?
Yes. The markdown twin at this comparison mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.
Which is better maintained, Made-With-ML or Open-LLM-Leaderboard?
Made-With-ML: Slowing. Open-LLM-Leaderboard: Dormant. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.
Where are the full trust reports for Made-With-ML and Open-LLM-Leaderboard?
GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: Made-With-ML trust report; Open-LLM-Leaderboard trust report.

Was this helpful?

Anonymous feedback helps us improve pages and translations.