Home/Compare/gpustack vs open-webui

Comparison

gpustack vs open-webui

Verdict

Pick gpustack when license: gpustack is Apache-2.0, open-webui is Other; pick open-webui when license: open-webui is Other, gpustack is Apache-2.0.

Markdown twin · gpustack alternatives · open-webui alternatives

GraphCanon updated today

gpustack logo

gpustack

gpustack/gpustack

5.3kpushed Jul 10, 2026
vs
open-webui logo

open-webui

open-webui/open-webui

145kpushed Jul 10, 2026

Trust & integrity

Signalgpustackopen-webui
Maintenance
Very active (1d since push)
As of today · github_public_v1
Very active (0d since push)
As of today · github_public_v1
Provenance
Not a fork · Organization account
As of today · github_public_v1
Not a fork · Organization account
As of today · github_public_v1
Security (OSV)
No lockfile
As of today · none
No MCP manifest
As of today · mcp_manifest

Tagline

gpustack
A GPU cluster manager for high-performance AI model serving (vLLM, SGLang) and on-demand SSH-accessible GPU instances.
open-webui
User-friendly AI Interface (Supports Ollama, OpenAI API, ...)

Stars

gpustack
5.3k
open-webui
145k

Forks

gpustack
566
open-webui
21k

Open issues

gpustack
609
open-webui
391

Language

gpustack
Python
open-webui
Python

Adopt for

gpustack
-
open-webui
Suitable for developers working with large language models who require a user-friendly interface and support for multiple APIs including Ollama and OpenAI.

Persona

gpustack
-
open-webui
-

Runtime

gpustack
-
open-webui
-

License

gpustack
Apache-2.0
open-webui
Other

Last pushed

gpustack
Jul 10, 2026
open-webui
Jul 10, 2026

Categories

gpustack
Inference & Serving, LLM Frameworks, Vector Databases
open-webui
Inference & Serving, LLM Frameworks

Trust and health

Days since push

gpustack
1d
open-webui
0d

Open issues (now)

gpustack
609
open-webui
391

Security scan

gpustack
No lockfile
open-webui
No MCP manifest

Full report

gpustack
Trust report
open-webui
Trust report

Choose gpustack if…

  • License: gpustack is Apache-2.0, open-webui is Other.
  • Tags unique to gpustack: ascend, cuda, deepseek, distributed-inference.
  • Also covers Vector Databases.

When NOT to use gpustack

  • Inference & Serving: Self-hosting rarely beats a hosted API on cost until you have steady, high-volume traffic.
  • LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves.
  • Vector Databases: Don't reach for a dedicated vector DB under ~100k vectors; pgvector on your existing Postgres is simpler to operate.

Choose open-webui if…

  • License: open-webui is Other, gpustack is Apache-2.0.
  • Tags unique to open-webui: ai, llm, openai, self-hosted.
  • When you need to integrate multiple AI services, such as Ollama and OpenAI, into a unified user interface.

When NOT to use open-webui

  • When looking for tooling that exclusively supports APIs other than Ollama and OpenAI, as these are specific areas of focus for open-webui.
  • If the requirement is a highly specialized interface tailored to specific tasks rather than a general AI interaction platform.

Explore

Sources

Every stat on this page traces to a dated GitHub sync, license file, enrichment field, or trust scan.

GitHub stars on cards: gpustack 5.3k · open-webui 145k (synced Jul 11, 2026).

Common questions

What is the difference between gpustack and open-webui?
gpustack: A GPU cluster manager for high-performance AI model serving (vLLM, SGLang) and on-demand SSH-accessible GPU instances.. open-webui: User-friendly AI Interface (Supports Ollama, OpenAI API, ...). See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.
When should I choose gpustack over open-webui?
Choose gpustack over open-webui when License: gpustack is Apache-2.0, open-webui is Other; Tags unique to gpustack: ascend, cuda, deepseek, distributed-inference; Also covers Vector Databases.
When should I choose open-webui over gpustack?
Choose open-webui over gpustack when License: open-webui is Other, gpustack is Apache-2.0; Tags unique to open-webui: ai, llm, openai, self-hosted; When you need to integrate multiple AI services, such as Ollama and OpenAI, into a unified user interface.
When should I avoid gpustack?
Inference & Serving: Self-hosting rarely beats a hosted API on cost until you have steady, high-volume traffic. LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves. Vector Databases: Don't reach for a dedicated vector DB under ~100k vectors; pgvector on your existing Postgres is simpler to operate.
When should I avoid open-webui?
When looking for tooling that exclusively supports APIs other than Ollama and OpenAI, as these are specific areas of focus for open-webui. If the requirement is a highly specialized interface tailored to specific tasks rather than a general AI interaction platform.
Is gpustack or open-webui more popular on GitHub?
open-webui has more GitHub stars (145,029 vs 5,301). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.
Are gpustack and open-webui open source?
Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (gpustack: Apache-2.0, open-webui: Other).
Where can I find alternatives to gpustack or open-webui?
GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at gpustack alternatives and open-webui alternatives (gpustack markdown twin, open-webui markdown twin), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.
Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?
Yes. The markdown twin at this comparison mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.
Which is better maintained, gpustack or open-webui?
gpustack: Very active. open-webui: Very active. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.
Where are the full trust reports for gpustack and open-webui?
GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: gpustack trust report; open-webui trust report.