Comparison
apps vs auto-evaluator
Verdict
Pick apps when apps is primarily Python; auto-evaluator is TypeScript; pick auto-evaluator when auto-evaluator is primarily TypeScript; apps is Python.
Markdown twin · apps alternatives · auto-evaluator alternatives
GraphCanon updated 2w
vs
Trust & integrity
| Signal | apps | auto-evaluator |
|---|---|---|
| Maintenance | Dormant (777d since push) As of 2w · github_public_v1 | Archived (408d since push) As of 2w · github_public_v1 |
| Provenance | Not a fork · Personal account As of 2w · github_public_v1 | Not a fork · Organization account As of 2w · github_public_v1 |
| OSV dependency advisories | Published findings As of 1mo · osv@v1 | No lockfile (source not queried) As of 1mo · osv@v1 |
| deps.dev advisories | Not queried deps.dev@v1 | Not queried deps.dev@v1 |
| OpenSSF Scorecard | Not queried openssf-scorecard@v1 | Not queried openssf-scorecard@v1 |
Tagline
- apps
- APPS: Automated Programming Progress Standard
- auto-evaluator
- auto-evaluator
Stars
- apps
- 534
- auto-evaluator
- 783
Forks
- apps
- 70
- auto-evaluator
- 102
Open issues
- apps
- 4
- auto-evaluator
- 21
Language
- apps
- Python
- auto-evaluator
- TypeScript
Adopt for
- apps
- APPS offers a benchmark to evaluate the competence of large language models on coding challenges using its datasets.
- auto-evaluator
- -
Persona
- apps
- -
- auto-evaluator
- -
Runtime
- apps
- -
- auto-evaluator
- -
License
- apps
- MIT
- auto-evaluator
- Other
Last pushed
- apps
- Jun 19, 2024
- auto-evaluator
- Jun 26, 2025
Categories
- apps
- Data & Retrieval, Evaluation & Observability
- auto-evaluator
- Evaluation & Observability
Trust and health
Maintenance
- apps
- Dormant (18%)
- auto-evaluator
- Archived (8%)
Days since push
- apps
- 777d
- auto-evaluator
- 408d
Archived on GitHub
- apps
- No
- auto-evaluator
- Yes
Open issues (now)
- apps
- 4
- auto-evaluator
- 21
Owner type
- apps
- User
- auto-evaluator
- Organization
OSV dependency advisories
- apps
- Published findings
- auto-evaluator
- No lockfile (source not queried)
Full report
- apps
- Trust report
- auto-evaluator
- Trust report
Choose apps if…
- apps is primarily Python; auto-evaluator is TypeScript.
- License: apps is MIT, auto-evaluator is Other.
- Tags unique to apps: code generation, program-synthesis.
- Also covers Data & Retrieval.
- When you need benchmarking datasets specifically tailored for assessing the performance of your AI in solving programming tasks
When NOT to use apps
- If you solely require general datasets without a focus on coding challenges
- When your use case does not involve using Python-based tools for developing machine learning applications that include program synthesis and code generation
Choose auto-evaluator if…
- auto-evaluator is primarily TypeScript; apps is Python.
- License: auto-evaluator is Other, apps is MIT.
- Tags unique to auto-evaluator: auto-evaluation, railway, typescript, vercel.
- Use auto-evaluator when you are working with TypeScript and need an integrated solution for evaluating AI models
When NOT to use auto-evaluator
- Avoid using auto-evaluator if you require a multi-language support environment, as it focuses solely on TypeScript
- Do not use this tool if your project's hosting requirements do not align with using Vercel or Railway
Explore
Sources
Every stat on this page traces to a dated GitHub sync, license file, enrichment field, or trust scan.
- GitHub stars (hendrycks/apps) · observed Aug 5, 2026
- GitHub forks (hendrycks/apps) · observed Aug 5, 2026
- Last push (hendrycks/apps) · observed Jun 19, 2024
- License file (MIT) · observed Aug 5, 2026
- Decision facts (enrichment) · observed Jul 17, 2026
- Trust scan (lockfile / OSV) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- GitHub stars (langchain-ai/auto-evaluator) · observed Aug 8, 2026
- GitHub forks (langchain-ai/auto-evaluator) · observed Aug 8, 2026
- Last push (langchain-ai/auto-evaluator) · observed Jun 26, 2025
- License file (Other) · observed Aug 8, 2026
- Decision facts (enrichment) · observed Jul 15, 2026
- Trust scan (lockfile / OSV) · observed Jul 11, 2026
GitHub stars on cards: apps 534 · auto-evaluator 783 (synced Aug 5, 2026).
Common questions
- What is the difference between apps and auto-evaluator?
- apps: APPS: Automated Programming Progress Standard. auto-evaluator: auto-evaluator. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.
- When should I choose apps over auto-evaluator?
- Choose apps over auto-evaluator when apps is primarily Python; auto-evaluator is TypeScript; License: apps is MIT, auto-evaluator is Other; Tags unique to apps: code generation, program-synthesis; Also covers Data & Retrieval; When you need benchmarking datasets specifically tailored for assessing the performance of your AI in solving programming tasks.
- When should I choose auto-evaluator over apps?
- Choose auto-evaluator over apps when auto-evaluator is primarily TypeScript; apps is Python; License: auto-evaluator is Other, apps is MIT; Tags unique to auto-evaluator: auto-evaluation, railway, typescript, vercel; Use auto-evaluator when you are working with TypeScript and need an integrated solution for evaluating AI models.
- When should I avoid apps?
- If you solely require general datasets without a focus on coding challenges When your use case does not involve using Python-based tools for developing machine learning applications that include program synthesis and code generation
- When should I avoid auto-evaluator?
- Avoid using auto-evaluator if you require a multi-language support environment, as it focuses solely on TypeScript Do not use this tool if your project's hosting requirements do not align with using Vercel or Railway
- Is apps or auto-evaluator more popular on GitHub?
- auto-evaluator has more GitHub stars (783 vs 534). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.
- Are apps and auto-evaluator open source?
- Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (apps: MIT, auto-evaluator: Other).
- Where can I find alternatives to apps or auto-evaluator?
- GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at apps alternatives and auto-evaluator alternatives (apps markdown twin, auto-evaluator markdown twin), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.
- Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?
- Yes. The markdown twin at this comparison mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.
- Which is better maintained, apps or auto-evaluator?
- apps: Dormant. auto-evaluator: Archived. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.
- Where are the full trust reports for apps and auto-evaluator?
- GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: apps trust report; auto-evaluator trust report.