Home/Compare/willow vs moby

Comparison

willow vs moby

Verdict

Pick willow when willow is primarily C; moby is Go; pick moby when moby is primarily Go; willow is C.

Markdown twin · willow alternatives · moby alternatives

GraphCanon updated today

willow logo

willow

HeyWillow/willow

3.1kpushed Feb 13, 2026
vs
moby logo

moby

moby/moby

72kpushed Jul 10, 2026

Trust & integrity

Signalwillowmoby
Maintenance
Slowing (147d since push)
As of today · github_public_v1
Very active (1d since push)
As of today · github_public_v1
Provenance
Not a fork · Organization account
As of today · github_public_v1
Not a fork · Organization account
As of today · github_public_v1
Security (OSV)
No lockfile
As of today · none
No criticals
As of today · osv@v1

Tagline

willow
Open source, local, and self-hosted Amazon Echo/Google Home competitive Voice Assistant alternative
moby
The Moby Project - a collaborative project for the container ecosystem to assemble container-based systems

Stars

willow
3.1k
moby
72k

Forks

willow
120
moby
19k

Open issues

willow
27
moby
3.8k

Language

willow
C
moby
Go

Adopt for

willow
-
moby
-

Persona

willow
-
moby
-

Runtime

willow
-
moby
-

License

willow
Apache-2.0
moby
Apache-2.0

Last pushed

willow
Feb 13, 2026
moby
Jul 10, 2026

Categories

willow
LLM Frameworks, Speech & Audio, Inference & Serving
moby
LLM Frameworks, Developer Tools, Inference & Serving

Trust and health

Maintenance

willow
Slowing (36%)
moby
Very active (96%)

Days since push

willow
147d
moby
1d

Open issues (now)

willow
27
moby
3.8k

Security scan

willow
No lockfile
moby
No criticals

Full report

Choose willow if…

  • willow is primarily C; moby is Go.
  • Tags unique to willow: esp-adf, deep-learning, google-home, esp-idf.
  • Also covers Speech & Audio.

When NOT to use willow

  • Last GitHub push was 148 days ago (slowing maintenance, Feb 13, 2026). Validate activity before betting a new project on willow.
  • LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves.
  • Inference & Serving: Self-hosting rarely beats a hosted API on cost until you have steady, high-volume traffic.

Choose moby if…

  • moby is primarily Go; willow is C.
  • Tags unique to moby: go, docker, golang, containers.
  • Also covers Developer Tools.

When NOT to use moby

  • LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves.
  • Developer Tools: A gateway is overkill when you're pinned to a single provider and model.
  • Inference & Serving: Self-hosting rarely beats a hosted API on cost until you have steady, high-volume traffic.

Explore

Sources

Every stat on this page traces to a dated GitHub sync, license file, enrichment field, or trust scan.

GitHub stars on cards: willow 3.1k · moby 72k (synced Jul 11, 2026).

Common questions

What is the difference between willow and moby?
willow: Open source, local, and self-hosted Amazon Echo/Google Home competitive Voice Assistant alternative. moby: The Moby Project - a collaborative project for the container ecosystem to assemble container-based systems. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.
When should I choose willow over moby?
Choose willow over moby when willow is primarily C; moby is Go; Tags unique to willow: esp-adf, deep-learning, google-home, esp-idf; Also covers Speech & Audio.
When should I choose moby over willow?
Choose moby over willow when moby is primarily Go; willow is C; Tags unique to moby: go, docker, golang, containers; Also covers Developer Tools.
When should I avoid willow?
Last GitHub push was 148 days ago (slowing maintenance, Feb 13, 2026). Validate activity before betting a new project on willow. LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves. Inference & Serving: Self-hosting rarely beats a hosted API on cost until you have steady, high-volume traffic.
When should I avoid moby?
LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves. Developer Tools: A gateway is overkill when you're pinned to a single provider and model. Inference & Serving: Self-hosting rarely beats a hosted API on cost until you have steady, high-volume traffic.
Is willow or moby more popular on GitHub?
moby has more GitHub stars (71,899 vs 3,066). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.
Are willow and moby open source?
Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (willow: Apache-2.0, moby: Apache-2.0).
Where can I find alternatives to willow or moby?
GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at willow alternatives and moby alternatives (willow markdown twin, moby markdown twin), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.
Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?
Yes. The markdown twin at this comparison mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.
Which is better maintained, willow or moby?
willow: Slowing. moby: Very active. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.
Where are the full trust reports for willow and moby?
GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: willow trust report; moby trust report.