Home/Compare/FastEdit vs DeepInception

Comparison

FastEdit vs DeepInception

Verdict

Pick FastEdit if fastEdit is a Python library for quick edits to large language models using PyTorch; pick DeepInception if deepInception is an exploration framework for modifying large language model responses to understand their behavior and influence their outputs.

Markdown twin · FastEdit alternatives · DeepInception alternatives

GraphCanon updated 2w

FastEdit logo

FastEdit

hiyouga/FastEdit

1.4kpushed Aug 13, 2023
vs
DeepInception logo

DeepInception

tmlr-group/DeepInception

177pushed Feb 20, 2024

Trust & integrity

SignalFastEditDeepInception
Maintenance
Dormant (1086d since push)
As of 3w · github_public_v1
Dormant (896d since push)
As of 2w · github_public_v1
Provenance
Not a fork · Personal account
As of 3w · github_public_v1
Not a fork · Organization account
As of 2w · github_public_v1
OSV dependency advisories
Published findings
As of 1mo · osv@v1
Published findings
As of 1mo · osv@v1
deps.dev advisories
Not queried
deps.dev@v1
Not queried
deps.dev@v1
OpenSSF Scorecard
Not queried
openssf-scorecard@v1
Not queried
openssf-scorecard@v1

Tagline

FastEdit
Editing large language models within 10 seconds
DeepInception
Develops techniques to influence large language model behavior

Stars

FastEdit
1.4k
DeepInception
177

Forks

FastEdit
103
DeepInception
19

Open issues

FastEdit
21
DeepInception
0

Language

FastEdit
Python
DeepInception
Python

Adopt for

FastEdit
FastEdit is a Python library for quick edits to large language models using PyTorch.
DeepInception
DeepInception is an exploration framework for modifying large language model responses to understand their behavior and influence their outputs.

Persona

FastEdit
-
DeepInception
-

Runtime

FastEdit
-
DeepInception
-

License

FastEdit
Apache-2.0
DeepInception
MIT

Last pushed

FastEdit
Aug 13, 2023
DeepInception
Feb 20, 2024

Categories

FastEdit
LLM Frameworks
DeepInception
LLM Frameworks

Trust and health

Days since push

FastEdit
1086d
DeepInception
896d

Open issues (now)

FastEdit
21
DeepInception
0

Owner type

FastEdit
User
DeepInception
Organization

Full report

FastEdit
Trust report
DeepInception
Trust report

Shared compatibility

  • Python · FastEdit: Python runtime · DeepInception: Python runtime

Choose FastEdit if…

  • License: FastEdit is Apache-2.0, DeepInception is MIT.
  • Requirements: Min -1 GB RAM; Requires Python 3.8+ and PyTorch 1.13.1+. Must also install 🤗Transformers, Datasets, Accelerate, sentencepiece, and fire.; Hardware requirements for a specific model can vary; refer to the provided table for minimum RAM sizes for different models..
  • Tags unique to FastEdit: bloom, chatbots, chatgpt, falcon.
  • When rapid iterations on language model edits are necessary, such as testing and tuning with tight feedback loops.

When NOT to use FastEdit

  • If your workflow requires integration with TensorFlow instead of PyTorch, since FastEdit is built on top of PyTorch.
  • For hardware configurations that cannot meet the fast editing mode's requirements; for instance, if you have less than 24GB RAM available.
  • If rapid edits within seconds are not a priority and longer processing times can be tolerated.

Choose DeepInception if…

  • License: DeepInception is MIT, FastEdit is Apache-2.0.
  • Pricing: The tool is free under the MIT license. However, using it may incur costs from third-party services like OpenAI API keys for accessing closed-source models.
  • Requirements: Requires PyTorch ≥1.10 with GPU support; Environment modification needed to include path configurations for Vicuna, Llama-2, and Falcon.
  • Tags unique to DeepInception: deep, inception, jailbreak, llm.
  • When you need to research the effects of specific modifications on the safety and trustworthiness of GPT-3, GPT-4, Vicuna, Llama-2, or Falcon models

When NOT to use DeepInception

  • For deployment in production environments where strict adherence to ethical and regulatory guidelines is mandatory, due to the experimental nature of DeepInception
  • When there's a need for direct application without exploring modification effects, as DeepInception requires setting up an environment that supports specific models and modifications

Explore

Sources

Every stat on this page traces to a dated GitHub sync, license file, enrichment field, or trust scan.

GitHub stars on cards: FastEdit 1.4k · DeepInception 177 (synced Aug 3, 2026).

Common questions

What is the difference between FastEdit and DeepInception?
FastEdit: Editing large language models within 10 seconds. DeepInception: Develops techniques to influence large language model behavior. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.
When should I choose FastEdit over DeepInception?
Choose FastEdit over DeepInception when License: FastEdit is Apache-2.0, DeepInception is MIT; Requirements: Min -1 GB RAM; Requires Python 3.8+ and PyTorch 1.13.1+. Must also install 🤗Transformers, Datasets, Accelerate, sentencepiece, and fire.; Hardware requirements for a specific model can vary; refer to the provided table for minimum RAM sizes for different models.; Tags unique to FastEdit: bloom, chatbots, chatgpt, falcon; When rapid iterations on language model edits are necessary, such as testing and tuning with tight feedback loops.
When should I choose DeepInception over FastEdit?
Choose DeepInception over FastEdit when License: DeepInception is MIT, FastEdit is Apache-2.0; Pricing: The tool is free under the MIT license. However, using it may incur costs from third-party services like OpenAI API keys for accessing closed-source models; Requirements: Requires PyTorch ≥1.10 with GPU support; Environment modification needed to include path configurations for Vicuna, Llama-2, and Falcon; Tags unique to DeepInception: deep, inception, jailbreak, llm; When you need to research the effects of specific modifications on the safety and trustworthiness of GPT-3, GPT-4, Vicuna, Llama-2, or Falcon models.
When should I avoid FastEdit?
If your workflow requires integration with TensorFlow instead of PyTorch, since FastEdit is built on top of PyTorch. For hardware configurations that cannot meet the fast editing mode's requirements; for instance, if you have less than 24GB RAM available. If rapid edits within seconds are not a priority and longer processing times can be tolerated.
When should I avoid DeepInception?
For deployment in production environments where strict adherence to ethical and regulatory guidelines is mandatory, due to the experimental nature of DeepInception When there's a need for direct application without exploring modification effects, as DeepInception requires setting up an environment that supports specific models and modifications
Is FastEdit or DeepInception more popular on GitHub?
FastEdit has more GitHub stars (1,370 vs 177). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.
Are FastEdit and DeepInception open source?
Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (FastEdit: Apache-2.0, DeepInception: MIT).
Where can I find alternatives to FastEdit or DeepInception?
GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at FastEdit alternatives and DeepInception alternatives (FastEdit markdown twin, DeepInception markdown twin), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.
Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?
Yes. The markdown twin at this comparison mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.
Which is better maintained, FastEdit or DeepInception?
FastEdit: Dormant. DeepInception: Dormant. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.
Where are the full trust reports for FastEdit and DeepInception?
GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: FastEdit trust report; DeepInception trust report.

Was this helpful?

Anonymous feedback helps us improve pages and translations.