Home/Compare/LlamaFactory vs awesome-AutoML

Comparison

LlamaFactory vs awesome-AutoML

Verdict

Pick LlamaFactory when license: LlamaFactory is Apache-2.0, awesome-AutoML is GPL-3.0; pick awesome-AutoML when license: awesome-AutoML is GPL-3.0, LlamaFactory is Apache-2.0.

Markdown twin · LlamaFactory alternatives · awesome-AutoML alternatives

GraphCanon updated today

LlamaFactory logo

LlamaFactory

hiyouga/LlamaFactory

73kpushed Jul 10, 2026
vs
awesome-AutoML logo

awesome-AutoML

windmaple/awesome-AutoML

940pushed Mar 24, 2026

Trust & integrity

SignalLlamaFactoryawesome-AutoML
Maintenance
Very active (0d since push)
As of today · github_public_v1
Slowing (109d since push)
As of today · github_public_v1
Provenance
Not a fork · Personal account
As of today · github_public_v1
Not a fork · Personal account
As of today · github_public_v1
Security (OSV)
No lockfile
As of today · none
No lockfile
As of today · none

Tagline

LlamaFactory
Unified Efficient Fine-Tuning of 100+ LLMs & VLMs
awesome-AutoML
Curating a list of AutoML-related research, tools, projects and other resources

Stars

LlamaFactory
73k
awesome-AutoML
940

Forks

LlamaFactory
8.9k
awesome-AutoML
155

Open issues

LlamaFactory
1.1k
awesome-AutoML
1

Language

LlamaFactory
Python
awesome-AutoML
-

Adopt for

LlamaFactory
LlamaFactory is a sophisticated tool for fine-tuning numerous large language models and visual language models efficiently using various methods such as LoRA, QLoRA, RLHF, and quantization.
awesome-AutoML
-

Persona

LlamaFactory
-
awesome-AutoML
-

Runtime

LlamaFactory
-
awesome-AutoML
-

License

LlamaFactory
Apache-2.0
awesome-AutoML
GPL-3.0

Last pushed

LlamaFactory
Jul 10, 2026
awesome-AutoML
Mar 24, 2026

Categories

LlamaFactory
Model Training, LLM Frameworks
awesome-AutoML
LLM Frameworks, AI Agents, Model Training

Trust and health

Maintenance

LlamaFactory
Very active (96%)
awesome-AutoML
Slowing (36%)

Days since push

LlamaFactory
0d
awesome-AutoML
109d

Open issues (now)

LlamaFactory
1.1k
awesome-AutoML
1

Full report

LlamaFactory
Trust report
awesome-AutoML
Trust report

Choose LlamaFactory if…

  • License: LlamaFactory is Apache-2.0, awesome-AutoML is GPL-3.0.
  • Tags unique to LlamaFactory: gemma, fine-tuning, deepseek, ai.
  • When you need to fine-tune over 100 different LLMs or VLMs with efficient methods like LoRA or QLoRA.

When NOT to use LlamaFactory

  • When you are looking to fine-tune less popular or niche models that are not supported within the 100+ models covered by LlamaFactory.
  • If your project specifically requires custom fine-tuning methods not available in this repository, such as certain versions of PEFT (Parameter Efficient Fine-Tuning) techniques excluding LoRA and QLoa

Choose awesome-AutoML if…

  • License: awesome-AutoML is GPL-3.0, LlamaFactory is Apache-2.0.
  • Also covers AI Agents.
  • Leaner open-issue backlog (1).

When NOT to use awesome-AutoML

  • Last GitHub push was 110 days ago (slowing maintenance, Mar 24, 2026). Validate activity before betting a new project on awesome-AutoML.
  • LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves.
  • AI Agents: Don't use an agent loop when a deterministic workflow would do; agents add latency, cost, and non-determinism.
  • Model Training: Try prompting and RAG first; fine-tuning is the answer to style/format, not missing knowledge.

Explore

Sources

Every stat on this page traces to a dated GitHub sync, license file, enrichment field, or trust scan.

GitHub stars on cards: LlamaFactory 73k · awesome-AutoML 940 (synced Jul 11, 2026).

Common questions

What is the difference between LlamaFactory and awesome-AutoML?
LlamaFactory: Unified Efficient Fine-Tuning of 100+ LLMs & VLMs. awesome-AutoML: Curating a list of AutoML-related research, tools, projects and other resources. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.
When should I choose LlamaFactory over awesome-AutoML?
Choose LlamaFactory over awesome-AutoML when License: LlamaFactory is Apache-2.0, awesome-AutoML is GPL-3.0; Tags unique to LlamaFactory: gemma, fine-tuning, deepseek, ai; When you need to fine-tune over 100 different LLMs or VLMs with efficient methods like LoRA or QLoRA.
When should I choose awesome-AutoML over LlamaFactory?
Choose awesome-AutoML over LlamaFactory when License: awesome-AutoML is GPL-3.0, LlamaFactory is Apache-2.0; Also covers AI Agents; Leaner open-issue backlog (1).
When should I avoid LlamaFactory?
When you are looking to fine-tune less popular or niche models that are not supported within the 100+ models covered by LlamaFactory. If your project specifically requires custom fine-tuning methods not available in this repository, such as certain versions of PEFT (Parameter Efficient Fine-Tuning) techniques excluding LoRA and QLoa
When should I avoid awesome-AutoML?
Last GitHub push was 110 days ago (slowing maintenance, Mar 24, 2026). Validate activity before betting a new project on awesome-AutoML. LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves. AI Agents: Don't use an agent loop when a deterministic workflow would do; agents add latency, cost, and non-determinism. Model Training: Try prompting and RAG first; fine-tuning is the answer to style/format, not missing knowledge.
Is LlamaFactory or awesome-AutoML more popular on GitHub?
LlamaFactory has more GitHub stars (73,157 vs 940). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.
Are LlamaFactory and awesome-AutoML open source?
Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (LlamaFactory: Apache-2.0, awesome-AutoML: GPL-3.0).
Where can I find alternatives to LlamaFactory or awesome-AutoML?
GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at LlamaFactory alternatives and awesome-AutoML alternatives (LlamaFactory markdown twin, awesome-AutoML markdown twin), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.
Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?
Yes. The markdown twin at this comparison mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.
Which is better maintained, LlamaFactory or awesome-AutoML?
LlamaFactory: Very active. awesome-AutoML: Slowing. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.
Where are the full trust reports for LlamaFactory and awesome-AutoML?
GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: LlamaFactory trust report; awesome-AutoML trust report.