Home/Compare/paperless-gpt vs moby

Comparison

paperless-gpt vs moby

Verdict

Pick paperless-gpt when license: paperless-gpt is MIT, moby is Apache-2.0; pick moby when license: moby is Apache-2.0, paperless-gpt is MIT.

Markdown twin · paperless-gpt alternatives · moby alternatives

GraphCanon updated today

paperless-gpt logo

paperless-gpt

icereed/paperless-gpt

2.5kpushed Jul 13, 2026
vs
moby logo

moby

moby/moby

72kpushed Jul 10, 2026

Trust & integrity

Signalpaperless-gptmoby
Maintenance
Very active (2d since push)
As of today · github_public_v1
Very active (1d since push)
As of 3d · github_public_v1
Provenance
Not a fork · Personal account
As of today · github_public_v1
Not a fork · Organization account
As of 3d · github_public_v1
OSV dependency advisories
Published findings
As of today · osv@v1
No published findings from this source as of 2026-07-11
As of 3d · osv@v1
deps.dev advisories
Not queried
deps.dev@v1
Not queried
deps.dev@v1
OpenSSF Scorecard
Not queried
openssf-scorecard@v1
Not queried
openssf-scorecard@v1

Tagline

paperless-gpt
Use LLMs and LLM Vision (OCR) to handle paperless-ngx - Document Digitalization powered by AI
moby
The Moby Project - a collaborative project for the container ecosystem to assemble container-based systems

Stars

paperless-gpt
2.5k
moby
72k

Forks

paperless-gpt
185
moby
19k

Open issues

paperless-gpt
154
moby
3.8k

Language

paperless-gpt
Go
moby
Go

Adopt for

paperless-gpt
-
moby
-

Persona

paperless-gpt
-
moby
-

Runtime

paperless-gpt
-
moby
-

License

paperless-gpt
MIT
moby
Apache-2.0

Last pushed

paperless-gpt
Jul 13, 2026
moby
Jul 10, 2026

Categories

paperless-gpt
Computer Vision, Inference & Serving, LLM Frameworks
moby
Developer Tools, Inference & Serving, LLM Frameworks

Trust and health

Days since push

paperless-gpt
2d
moby
1d

Open issues (now)

paperless-gpt
154
moby
3.8k

Owner type

paperless-gpt
User
moby
Organization

OSV dependency advisories

paperless-gpt
Published findings
moby
No published findings from this source as of 2026-07-11

Full report

paperless-gpt
Trust report

Choose paperless-gpt if…

  • License: paperless-gpt is MIT, moby is Apache-2.0.
  • Tags unique to paperless-gpt: ai, chatgpt, llm, mistral.
  • Also covers Computer Vision.

When NOT to use paperless-gpt

  • Inference & Serving: Self-hosting rarely beats a hosted API on cost until you have steady, high-volume traffic.
  • LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves.

Choose moby if…

  • License: moby is Apache-2.0, paperless-gpt is MIT.
  • Tags unique to moby: containers, docker, go, golang.
  • Also covers Developer Tools.

When NOT to use moby

  • Developer Tools: A gateway is overkill when you're pinned to a single provider and model.
  • Inference & Serving: Self-hosting rarely beats a hosted API on cost until you have steady, high-volume traffic.
  • LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves.

Explore

Sources

Every stat on this page traces to a dated GitHub sync, license file, enrichment field, or trust scan.

GitHub stars on cards: paperless-gpt 2.5k · moby 72k (synced Jul 15, 2026).

Common questions

What is the difference between paperless-gpt and moby?
paperless-gpt: Use LLMs and LLM Vision (OCR) to handle paperless-ngx - Document Digitalization powered by AI. moby: The Moby Project - a collaborative project for the container ecosystem to assemble container-based systems. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.
When should I choose paperless-gpt over moby?
Choose paperless-gpt over moby when License: paperless-gpt is MIT, moby is Apache-2.0; Tags unique to paperless-gpt: ai, chatgpt, llm, mistral; Also covers Computer Vision.
When should I choose moby over paperless-gpt?
Choose moby over paperless-gpt when License: moby is Apache-2.0, paperless-gpt is MIT; Tags unique to moby: containers, docker, go, golang; Also covers Developer Tools.
When should I avoid paperless-gpt?
Inference & Serving: Self-hosting rarely beats a hosted API on cost until you have steady, high-volume traffic. LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves.
When should I avoid moby?
Developer Tools: A gateway is overkill when you're pinned to a single provider and model. Inference & Serving: Self-hosting rarely beats a hosted API on cost until you have steady, high-volume traffic. LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves.
Is paperless-gpt or moby more popular on GitHub?
moby has more GitHub stars (71,899 vs 2,533). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.
Are paperless-gpt and moby open source?
Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (paperless-gpt: MIT, moby: Apache-2.0).
Where can I find alternatives to paperless-gpt or moby?
GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at paperless-gpt alternatives and moby alternatives (paperless-gpt markdown twin, moby markdown twin), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.
Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?
Yes. The markdown twin at this comparison mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.
Which is better maintained, paperless-gpt or moby?
paperless-gpt: Very active. moby: Very active. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.
Where are the full trust reports for paperless-gpt and moby?
GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: paperless-gpt trust report; moby trust report.

Was this helpful?

Anonymous feedback helps us improve pages and translations.