Home/Compare/ArtiVC vs lakeFS

Comparison

ArtiVC vs lakeFS

Verdict

Pick ArtiVC if a CLI tool focused on data versioning across multiple cloud storage solutions; pick lakeFS if lakeFS provides Git-like functionality for managing versions of data in a data lake, compatible with storage solutions like S3 and Azure.

Markdown twin · ArtiVC alternatives · lakeFS alternatives

GraphCanon updated 3w

ArtiVC logo

ArtiVC

InfuseAI/ArtiVC

312pushed Jul 20, 2026
vs
lakeFS logo

lakeFS

treeverse/lakeFS

5.5kpushed Aug 3, 2026

Trust & integrity

SignalArtiVClakeFS
Maintenance
Active (14d since push)
As of 3w · github_public_v1
Very active (0d since push)
As of 3w · github_public_v1
Provenance
Not a fork · Organization account
As of 3w · github_public_v1
Not a fork · Organization account
As of 3w · github_public_v1
OSV dependency advisories
Published findings
As of 1mo · osv@v1
Published findings
As of 1mo · osv@v1
deps.dev advisories
Not queried
deps.dev@v1
Not queried
deps.dev@v1
OpenSSF Scorecard
Not queried
openssf-scorecard@v1
Not queried
openssf-scorecard@v1

Tagline

ArtiVC
A CLI tool for data versioning on cloud storage
lakeFS
Data version control for your data lake

Stars

ArtiVC
312
lakeFS
5.5k

Forks

ArtiVC
15
lakeFS
472

Open issues

ArtiVC
12
lakeFS
437

Language

ArtiVC
Go
lakeFS
Go

Adopt for

ArtiVC
A CLI tool focused on data versioning across multiple cloud storage solutions.
lakeFS
lakeFS provides Git-like functionality for managing versions of data in a data lake, compatible with storage solutions like S3 and Azure.

Persona

ArtiVC
-
lakeFS
-

Runtime

ArtiVC
-
lakeFS
-

License

ArtiVC
Apache-2.0
lakeFS
Apache-2.0

Last pushed

ArtiVC
Jul 20, 2026
lakeFS
Aug 3, 2026

Categories

ArtiVC
Data & Retrieval
lakeFS
Data & Retrieval

Trust and health

Maintenance

ArtiVC
Active (82%)
lakeFS
Very active (96%)

Days since push

ArtiVC
14d
lakeFS
0d

Open issues (now)

ArtiVC
12
lakeFS
437

Full report

Choose ArtiVC if…

  • Requirements: Min 1 GB RAM.
  • Tags unique to ArtiVC: cloud-storage, command-line, data-versioning, version control.
  • When you need to efficiently manage and version large datasets stored in AWS S3, Google Cloud Storage, Azure Blob Storage, or over SSH.

When NOT to use ArtiVC

  • ArtiVC might not be suitable if your primary concern is the versioning of code rather than large datasets, as it lacks features specific to software version control.
  • Avoid using ArtiVC if you require a GUI interface for data management since it is exclusively designed as a command-line tool.

Choose lakeFS if…

  • Tags unique to lakeFS: apache-spark, aws-s3, azure-blob-storage, data-engineering.
  • lakeFS ships Docker support for self-hosted deployment.
  • When you need version control for large-scale datasets stored in a data lake, similar to how codebases are managed with Git.

When NOT to use lakeFS

  • If your use case involves managing small files or datasets that do not benefit from a Git-like history for data changes due to overhead.
  • For situations where compliance requirements preclude open-source solutions or those under the Apache 2.0 license, as lakeFS may not meet these specific needs.

Explore

Sources

Every stat on this page traces to a dated GitHub sync, license file, enrichment field, or trust scan.

GitHub stars on cards: ArtiVC 312 · lakeFS 5.5k (synced Aug 3, 2026).

Common questions

What is the difference between ArtiVC and lakeFS?
ArtiVC: A CLI tool for data versioning on cloud storage. lakeFS: Data version control for your data lake. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.
When should I choose ArtiVC over lakeFS?
Choose ArtiVC over lakeFS when Requirements: Min 1 GB RAM; Tags unique to ArtiVC: cloud-storage, command-line, data-versioning, version control; When you need to efficiently manage and version large datasets stored in AWS S3, Google Cloud Storage, Azure Blob Storage, or over SSH.
When should I choose lakeFS over ArtiVC?
Choose lakeFS over ArtiVC when Tags unique to lakeFS: apache-spark, aws-s3, azure-blob-storage, data-engineering; lakeFS ships Docker support for self-hosted deployment; When you need version control for large-scale datasets stored in a data lake, similar to how codebases are managed with Git.
When should I avoid ArtiVC?
ArtiVC might not be suitable if your primary concern is the versioning of code rather than large datasets, as it lacks features specific to software version control. Avoid using ArtiVC if you require a GUI interface for data management since it is exclusively designed as a command-line tool.
When should I avoid lakeFS?
If your use case involves managing small files or datasets that do not benefit from a Git-like history for data changes due to overhead. For situations where compliance requirements preclude open-source solutions or those under the Apache 2.0 license, as lakeFS may not meet these specific needs.
Is ArtiVC or lakeFS more popular on GitHub?
lakeFS has more GitHub stars (5,480 vs 312). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.
Are ArtiVC and lakeFS open source?
Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (ArtiVC: Apache-2.0, lakeFS: Apache-2.0).
Where can I find alternatives to ArtiVC or lakeFS?
GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at ArtiVC alternatives and lakeFS alternatives (ArtiVC markdown twin, lakeFS markdown twin), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.
Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?
Yes. The markdown twin at this comparison mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.
Which is better maintained, ArtiVC or lakeFS?
ArtiVC: Active. lakeFS: Very active. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.
Where are the full trust reports for ArtiVC and lakeFS?
GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: ArtiVC trust report; lakeFS trust report.

Was this helpful?

Anonymous feedback helps us improve pages and translations.