Comparison
plano vs gateway
plano (AI-native proxy server and data plane for agentic apps) vs gateway (A blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails) - live GitHub stats and typed graph relationships, not marketing.
Markdown twin · plano alternatives · gateway alternatives
GraphCanon updated today
Tagline
- plano
- AI-native proxy server and data plane for agentic apps
- gateway
- A blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails
Stars
- plano
- 6.7k
- gateway
- 12k
Forks
- plano
- 443
- gateway
- 1.2k
Open issues
- plano
- 132
- gateway
- 217
Language
- plano
- Rust
- gateway
- TypeScript
Adopt for
- plano
- Plano is an AI-native proxy server and data plane designed to support agentic applications by handling orchestration, safety, observability, and smart LLM routing. It leverages Rust for efficiency and uses a modular, out
- gateway
- Portkey-AI/gateway is an open-source AI Gateway that provides fast, secure routing to over 1600 AI models with built-in guardrails for enhanced security and reliability.
Persona
- plano
- -
- gateway
- -
Runtime
- plano
- -
- gateway
- -
License
- plano
- Apache-2.0
- gateway
- MIT
Last pushed
- plano
- Jul 7, 2026
- gateway
- May 25, 2026
Categories
- plano
- AI Agents, Evaluation & Observability, Inference & Serving
- gateway
- LLM Frameworks, Developer Tools
Trust and health
Maintenance
- plano
- Very active (96%)
- gateway
- Steady (60%)
Days since push
- plano
- 0d
- gateway
- 43d
Open issues (now)
- plano
- 132
- gateway
- 217
Security scan
- plano
- No lockfile
- gateway
- No MCP manifest
Full report
- plano
- Trust report
- gateway
- Trust report
Typed relationship
plano alternative gatewayPlano and Portkey both act as AI gateways with smart LLM routing, orchestration capabilities, and safety features. They serve similar needs for managing AI agents but may differ in specific features or performance.
Choose plano if…
- plano is primarily Rust; gateway is TypeScript.
- License: plano is Apache-2.0, gateway is MIT.
- Plano and Portkey both act as AI gateways with smart LLM routing, orchestration capabilities, and safety features. They serve similar needs for managing AI agents but may differ in specific features or performance.
- Tags unique to plano: llm-routing, orchestration, proxy-server, observability.
- Also covers AI Agents, Evaluation & Observability, Inference & Serving.
- - When you need to decouple essential functionalities such as agent routing, orchestration, moderation policies, and model agility from your application code.
When NOT to use plano
- - If your project requires only basic functionalities without advanced orchestration or model management, Plano's comprehensive features may introduce unnecessary complexity.
- - When focusing on a specific language or framework that does not benefit significantly from the modular and multi-framework support offered by Plano.
- - For scenarios where the additional layer of an out-of-process data plane might increase latency beyond acceptable levels for your application.
Choose gateway if…
- gateway is primarily TypeScript; plano is Rust.
- License: gateway is MIT, plano is Apache-2.0.
- Plano and Portkey both act as AI gateways with smart LLM routing, orchestration capabilities, and safety features. They serve similar needs for managing AI agents but may differ in specific features or performance.
- Tags unique to gateway: gateway, llm, generative-ai, openai.
- Also covers LLM Frameworks, Developer Tools.
- When you need rapid integration of any language model in your application within a matter of minutes.
When NOT to use gateway
- Avoid if your requirements are better served by lightweight frameworks that do not require advanced guardrails or extensive integration with multiple language models.
- If you specifically seek a service without integrated security features, opting for a more minimalist framework may be preferable.
- When needing to deploy in environments where TypeScript is less preferred compared to other languages like Python due to maintenance or team familiarity reasons.
Explore
plano trust report →gateway trust report →AI Agents category →Evaluation & Observability category →Inference & Serving category →LLM Frameworks category →Developer Tools category →All comparisonsStack workflowsTrending tools
Related comparisons
Common questions
- What is the difference between plano and gateway?
- plano: AI-native proxy server and data plane for agentic apps. gateway: A blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.
- When should I choose plano over gateway?
- Choose plano over gateway when plano is primarily Rust; gateway is TypeScript; License: plano is Apache-2.0, gateway is MIT; Plano and Portkey both act as AI gateways with smart LLM routing, orchestration capabilities, and safety features. They serve similar needs for managing AI agents but may differ in specific features or performance; Tags unique to plano: llm-routing, orchestration, proxy-server, observability; Also covers AI Agents, Evaluation & Observability, Inference & Serving; - When you need to decouple essential functionalities such as agent routing, orchestration, moderation policies, and model agility from your application code.
- When should I choose gateway over plano?
- Choose gateway over plano when gateway is primarily TypeScript; plano is Rust; License: gateway is MIT, plano is Apache-2.0; Plano and Portkey both act as AI gateways with smart LLM routing, orchestration capabilities, and safety features. They serve similar needs for managing AI agents but may differ in specific features or performance; Tags unique to gateway: gateway, llm, generative-ai, openai; Also covers LLM Frameworks, Developer Tools; When you need rapid integration of any language model in your application within a matter of minutes.
- When should I avoid plano?
- - If your project requires only basic functionalities without advanced orchestration or model management, Plano's comprehensive features may introduce unnecessary complexity. - When focusing on a specific language or framework that does not benefit significantly from the modular and multi-framework support offered by Plano. - For scenarios where the additional layer of an out-of-process data plane might increase latency beyond acceptable levels for your application.
- When should I avoid gateway?
- Avoid if your requirements are better served by lightweight frameworks that do not require advanced guardrails or extensive integration with multiple language models. If you specifically seek a service without integrated security features, opting for a more minimalist framework may be preferable. When needing to deploy in environments where TypeScript is less preferred compared to other languages like Python due to maintenance or team familiarity reasons.
- Is plano or gateway more popular on GitHub?
- gateway has more GitHub stars (12,354 vs 6,688). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.
- Are plano and gateway open source?
- Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (plano: Apache-2.0, gateway: MIT).
- Where can I find alternatives to plano or gateway?
- GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at /tools/katanemo-plano/alternatives and /tools/portkey-ai-gateway/alternatives (/tools/katanemo-plano/alternatives.md, /tools/portkey-ai-gateway/alternatives.md), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.
- Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?
- Yes. The markdown twin at /compare/katanemo-plano-vs-portkey-ai-gateway.md mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.
- Which is better maintained, plano or gateway?
- plano: Very active. gateway: Steady. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.
- Where are the full trust reports for plano and gateway?
- GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: plano: /tools/katanemo-plano/trust; gateway: /tools/portkey-ai-gateway/trust.