Comparison
khoj vs llm-wiki-agent
Verdict
Pick khoj if khoj is a self-hosted AI assistant that supports integration with multiple LLMs, enabling users to build custom agents and conduct deep research using both web and local documents; pick llm-wiki-agent if llm-wiki-agent serves as a self-maintained personal knowledge base using AI agents like Claude, Codex, OpenCode, and Gemini CLI.
Markdown twin · khoj alternatives · llm-wiki-agent alternatives
GraphCanon updated Sep 20, 2026
6views this month
vs
Trust & integrity
| Signal | khoj | llm-wiki-agent |
|---|---|---|
| Maintenance | Steady (47d since push) As of Sep 18, 2026 · github_public_v1 | Very active (0d since push) As of Sep 8, 2026 · github_public_v1 |
| Provenance | Not a fork · Organization account As of Sep 18, 2026 · github_public_v1 | Not a fork · Organization account As of Sep 8, 2026 · github_public_v1 |
| OSV dependency advisories | No lockfile (source not queried) As of Sep 18, 2026 · osv@v1 | No published findings from this source as of 2026-07-11 As of Jul 11, 2026 · osv@v1 |
| deps.dev advisories | Not queried deps.dev@v1 | Not queried deps.dev@v1 |
| OpenSSF Scorecard | Not queried openssf-scorecard@v1 | Not queried openssf-scorecard@v1 |
Tagline
- khoj
- Self-hostable AI second brain for personalized research and automation
- llm-wiki-agent
- A personal knowledge base that builds and maintains itself using various AI agents.
Stars
- khoj
- 37k
- llm-wiki-agent
- 3.5k
Forks
- khoj
- 2.5k
- llm-wiki-agent
- 397
Open issues
- khoj
- 150
- llm-wiki-agent
- 5
Language
- khoj
- Python
- llm-wiki-agent
- Python
Adopt for
- khoj
- Khoj is a self-hosted AI assistant that supports integration with multiple LLMs, enabling users to build custom agents and conduct deep research using both web and local documents.
- llm-wiki-agent
- llm-wiki-agent serves as a self-maintained personal knowledge base using AI agents like Claude, Codex, OpenCode, and Gemini CLI.
Persona
- khoj
- -
- llm-wiki-agent
- -
Runtime
- khoj
- -
- llm-wiki-agent
- -
License
- khoj
- Khoj is licensed under AGPL-3.0, which means it is free to use, modify, and distribute, but any derivative works must also be released under the same license.
- llm-wiki-agent
- MIT
Last pushed
- khoj
- Aug 2, 2026
- llm-wiki-agent
- Sep 7, 2026
Categories
- khoj
- AI Agents, Data & Retrieval, Developer Tools, Inference & Serving, Model Training
- llm-wiki-agent
- AI Agents, Data & Retrieval
Trust and health
Maintenance
- khoj
- Steady (60%)
- llm-wiki-agent
- Very active (96%)
Days since push
- khoj
- 47d
- llm-wiki-agent
- 0d
Open issues (now)
- khoj
- 150
- llm-wiki-agent
- 5
Stars delta
- khoj
- +887 (30d)
- llm-wiki-agent
- +163 (30d)
Open issues delta
- khoj
- +17 (30d)
- llm-wiki-agent
- +2 (30d)
OSV dependency advisories
- khoj
- No lockfile (source not queried)
- llm-wiki-agent
- No published findings from this source as of 2026-07-11
Full report
- khoj
- Trust report
- llm-wiki-agent
- Trust report
Choose khoj if…
- License: khoj is AGPL-3.0, llm-wiki-agent is MIT.
- Pricing: Khoj is free to use, but users may incur costs related to hosting and the LLMs they choose to integrate..
- Requirements: Min 4 GB RAM; Requires Docker; Khoj requires Docker for setup and operation.; Users must have a Python environment and the necessary dependencies installed..
- Tags unique to khoj: agent, ai, assistant, chat.
- Also covers Developer Tools, Inference & Serving, Model Training.
- khoj ships Docker support for self-hosted deployment.
- When you need a self-hosted solution for personalized research and automation that can integrate with a variety of LLMs, including GPT, Claude, Gemini, LLaMA, Qwen, and Mistral.
When NOT to use khoj
- If you are looking for a cloud-based service without the need for self-hosting, Khoj may not be the best fit.
- Khoj might not be ideal if you are seeking a tool that does not support a wide range of LLMs and requires a more specialized integration.
- If your research and automation needs are simple and do not require deep integration with local documents or web sources, a more straightforward tool might be more appropriate.
Choose llm-wiki-agent if…
- License: llm-wiki-agent is MIT, khoj is AGPL-3.0.
- Tags unique to llm-wiki-agent: ai-agent, automation, knowledge-base, llm.
- When you need to create an interlinked wiki without setting up API keys or configuring Python environments.
When NOT to use llm-wiki-agent
- If the process requires strict privacy controls and no third-party AI agents can be used.
- When your project needs real-time interaction with APIs for dynamic content integration, as llm-wiki-agent does not support API-driven operations.
Explore
Sources
Every stat on this page traces to a dated GitHub sync, license file, enrichment field, or trust scan.
- GitHub stars (khoj-ai/khoj) · observed Sep 20, 2026
- GitHub forks (khoj-ai/khoj) · observed Sep 20, 2026
- Last push (khoj-ai/khoj) · observed Aug 2, 2026
- License file (AGPL-3.0) · observed Sep 20, 2026
- Decision facts (enrichment) · observed Sep 18, 2026
- Trust scan (lockfile / OSV) · observed Sep 18, 2026
- GitHub stars (SamurAIGPT/llm-wiki-agent) · observed Sep 20, 2026
- GitHub forks (SamurAIGPT/llm-wiki-agent) · observed Sep 20, 2026
- Last push (SamurAIGPT/llm-wiki-agent) · observed Sep 7, 2026
- License file (MIT) · observed Sep 20, 2026
- Decision facts (enrichment) · observed Jul 14, 2026
- Trust scan (lockfile / OSV) · observed Jul 11, 2026
GitHub stars on cards: khoj 37k · llm-wiki-agent 3.5k (synced Sep 20, 2026).
Common questions
- What is the difference between khoj and llm-wiki-agent?
- khoj: Self-hostable AI second brain for personalized research and automation. llm-wiki-agent: A personal knowledge base that builds and maintains itself using various AI agents.. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.
- When should I choose khoj over llm-wiki-agent?
- Choose khoj over llm-wiki-agent when License: khoj is AGPL-3.0, llm-wiki-agent is MIT; Pricing: Khoj is free to use, but users may incur costs related to hosting and the LLMs they choose to integrate.; Requirements: Min 4 GB RAM; Requires Docker; Khoj requires Docker for setup and operation.; Users must have a Python environment and the necessary dependencies installed.; Tags unique to khoj: agent, ai, assistant, chat; Also covers Developer Tools, Inference & Serving, Model Training; khoj ships Docker support for self-hosted deployment; When you need a self-hosted solution for personalized research and automation that can integrate with a variety of LLMs, including GPT, Claude, Gemini, LLaMA, Qwen, and Mistral.
- When should I choose llm-wiki-agent over khoj?
- Choose llm-wiki-agent over khoj when License: llm-wiki-agent is MIT, khoj is AGPL-3.0; Tags unique to llm-wiki-agent: ai-agent, automation, knowledge-base, llm; When you need to create an interlinked wiki without setting up API keys or configuring Python environments.
- When should I avoid khoj?
- If you are looking for a cloud-based service without the need for self-hosting, Khoj may not be the best fit. Khoj might not be ideal if you are seeking a tool that does not support a wide range of LLMs and requires a more specialized integration. If your research and automation needs are simple and do not require deep integration with local documents or web sources, a more straightforward tool might be more appropriate.
- When should I avoid llm-wiki-agent?
- If the process requires strict privacy controls and no third-party AI agents can be used. When your project needs real-time interaction with APIs for dynamic content integration, as llm-wiki-agent does not support API-driven operations.
- Is khoj or llm-wiki-agent more popular on GitHub?
- khoj has more GitHub stars (37,399 vs 3,497). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.
- Are khoj and llm-wiki-agent open source?
- Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (khoj: AGPL-3.0, llm-wiki-agent: MIT).
- Where can I find alternatives to khoj or llm-wiki-agent?
- GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at khoj alternatives and llm-wiki-agent alternatives (khoj markdown twin, llm-wiki-agent markdown twin), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.
- Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?
- Yes. The markdown twin at this comparison mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.
- Which is better maintained, khoj or llm-wiki-agent?
- khoj: Steady. llm-wiki-agent: Very active. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.
- Where are the full trust reports for khoj and llm-wiki-agent?
- GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: khoj trust report; llm-wiki-agent trust report.