GraphCanon
Home/Compare/kong vs context7

Comparison

kong vs context7

Verdict

Pick kong when kong is primarily Lua; context7 is TypeScript; pick context7 when context7 is primarily TypeScript; kong is Lua.

Markdown twin · kong alternatives · context7 alternatives

GraphCanon updated today

kong logo

kong

Kong/kong

★ 44kpushed Jul 1, 2026
vs
context7 logo

context7

upstash/context7

★ 59kpushed Jul 10, 2026

Trust & integrity

Signalkongcontext7
Maintenance
Active (10d since push)
As of today · github_public_v1
Very active (0d since push)
As of today · github_public_v1
Provenance
Not a fork · Organization account
As of today · github_public_v1
Not a fork · Organization account
As of today · github_public_v1
Security (OSV)
No MCP manifest
As of today · mcp_manifest
No MCP manifest
As of today · mcp_manifest
kong trust reportcontext7 trust reportTrust methodology

Tagline

kong
🦍 The API and AI Gateway
context7
Up-to-date code documentation for LLMs and AI code editors

Stars

kong
44k
context7
59k

Forks

kong
5.2k
context7
2.8k

Open issues

kong
155
context7
28

Language

kong
Lua
context7
TypeScript

Adopt for

kong
-
context7
Context7 is a platform devoted to providing updated code documentation specifically tailored for LLMs (Large Language Models) and AI-based code editing tools. It uses TypeScript and operates under the MIT license.

Persona

kong
-
context7
-

Runtime

kong
-
context7
-

License

kong
Apache-2.0
context7
MIT

Last pushed

kong
Jul 1, 2026
context7
Jul 10, 2026

Categories

kong
LLM Frameworks, Developer Tools
context7
LLM Frameworks, Developer Tools

Trust and health

Maintenance

kong
Active (82%)
context7
Very active (96%)

Days since push

kong
10d
context7
0d

Open issues (now)

kong
155
context7
28

Full report

kong
Trust report
context7
Trust report

Choose kong if…

  • kong is primarily Lua; context7 is TypeScript.
  • License: kong is Apache-2.0, context7 is MIT.
  • Tags unique to kong: api-management, cloud-native, ai, artificial-intelligence.

When NOT to use kong

  • LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves.
  • Developer Tools: A gateway is overkill when you're pinned to a single provider and model.
GitHubDetails

Choose context7 if…

  • context7 is primarily TypeScript; kong is Lua.
  • License: context7 is MIT, kong is Apache-2.0.
  • Tags unique to context7: mcp-server, llm, vibe-coding, mcp.
  • When your project heavily relies on Large Language Models or AI-based code editors for enhancing development efficiency.

When NOT to use context7

  • Avoid Context7 if your current project doesn't involve integration with Large Language Models or any AI-driven code editing utilities, as it will not offer significant advantages.
  • If your team strictly adheres to a development workflow that does not benefit from having real-time documentation tailored for LLMs and AI code editors, opting for more general developer tools may be更
GitHubDetails

Explore

kong trust report →context7 trust report →LLM Frameworks category →Developer Tools category →All comparisonsStack workflowsTrending tools

Sources

Every stat on this page traces to a dated GitHub sync, license file, enrichment field, or trust scan.

GitHub stars on cards: kong 44k · context7 59k (synced Jul 11, 2026).

Common questions

What is the difference between kong and context7?
kong: 🦍 The API and AI Gateway. context7: Up-to-date code documentation for LLMs and AI code editors. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.
When should I choose kong over context7?
Choose kong over context7 when kong is primarily Lua; context7 is TypeScript; License: kong is Apache-2.0, context7 is MIT; Tags unique to kong: api-management, cloud-native, ai, artificial-intelligence.
When should I choose context7 over kong?
Choose context7 over kong when context7 is primarily TypeScript; kong is Lua; License: context7 is MIT, kong is Apache-2.0; Tags unique to context7: mcp-server, llm, vibe-coding, mcp; When your project heavily relies on Large Language Models or AI-based code editors for enhancing development efficiency.
When should I avoid kong?
LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves. Developer Tools: A gateway is overkill when you're pinned to a single provider and model.
When should I avoid context7?
Avoid Context7 if your current project doesn't involve integration with Large Language Models or any AI-driven code editing utilities, as it will not offer significant advantages. If your team strictly adheres to a development workflow that does not benefit from having real-time documentation tailored for LLMs and AI code editors, opting for more general developer tools may be更
Is kong or context7 more popular on GitHub?
context7 has more GitHub stars (58,913 vs 43,768). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.
Are kong and context7 open source?
Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (kong: Apache-2.0, context7: MIT).
Where can I find alternatives to kong or context7?
GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at kong alternatives and context7 alternatives (kong markdown twin, context7 markdown twin), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.
Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?
Yes. The markdown twin at this comparison mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.
Which is better maintained, kong or context7?
kong: Active. context7: Very active. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.
Where are the full trust reports for kong and context7?
GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: kong trust report; context7 trust report.